Medical Ethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Medical Ethics

Description:

WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. 1964. COUNCIL FOR INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. 1982 ... Shoddy science is never ethical ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: heid6
Category:
Tags: ethics | medical

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Medical Ethics


1
Medical Ethics
  • Kazem Heidari

2
  • From the time immediately after World War II
    until the early 1990s,there was a gradually
    developing consensus about the key ethical
    principles that should underlie the research
    endeavor.

3
  • Nuremberg code
  • 1947

4
  • Tuskegee syphilis study

5
  • Helsinki declaration
  • WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
  • 1964

6
  • COUNCIL FOR INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF
    MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • 1982

7
  • The health of my patient will be my first
    consideration.

8
  • Medical progress is based on research which
    ultimately must rest in part on experimentation
    involving human subjects.
  • Most prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic
    procedures involve risks and burdens.

9
  • Research Investigators should be aware of the
    ethical, legal and regulatory requirements for
    research on human subjects in their own countries
    as well as applicable international requirements.

10
  • It is the duty of the physician in medical
    research to protect the life, health, privacy,
    and dignity of the human subject.
  • Medical research should be based on a thorough
    knowledge of the scientific literature, other
    relevant sources of information, and on adequate
    laboratory and, where appropriate, animal
    experimentation.

11
  • The independent ethics committee should be in
    conformity with the laws and regulations of the
    country in which the research experiment is
    performed

12
Principles
  • voluntary participation
  • people not be coerced into participating in
    research

13
  • Captive audiences prisons, universities, and
    places like that
  • The right of research subjects to safeguard their
    integrity must always be respected.

14
  • Informed consent
  • Each potential subject must be adequately
    informed
  • Aims
  • methods
  • sources of funding
  • any possible conflicts of interest
  • institutional affiliations of the researcher
  • the anticipated benefits
  • potential risks of the study and the discomfort
    it may entail.

15
Informed consent
  • Prospective research participants must be fully
    informed about the procedures and risks involved
    in research and must give their consent to
    participate.
  • Ethical standards also require that researchers
    not put participants in a situation where they
    might be at risk of harm as a result of their
    participation.

16
(No Transcript)
17
Informed consent
  • The physician should be particularly cautious if
    the subject is in a dependent relationship with
    the physician or may consent under duress.

18
Informed consent
  • Research on individuals from whom it is not
    possible to obtain consent, should be done only
    if the physical/mental condition that prevents
    obtaining informed consent is a necessary
    characteristic of the research population.
  • approval of the review committee
  • obtained as soon as possible from the individual
    or a legally authorized surrogate

19
  • Confidentiality
  • They are assured that identifying information
    will not be made available to anyone who is not
    directly involved in the study.
  • Anonymity the participant will remain anonymous
    throughout the study

20
  • Right to service
  • When a new treatment or program may have
    beneficial effects, persons assigned to the
    no-treatment control may feel their rights to
    equal access to services are being curtailed.

21
Ethics in other subjects
  • A study must employ a scientifically valid design
    to answer the research question. Shoddy science
    is never ethical

22
  • A study must address a question of sufficient
    value to justify the risk posed to participants.
    Exposing subjects even to low risk to answer a
    trivial question is unacceptable

23
  • Study findings must be reported accurately and
    promptly. Methods, results and conclusions must
    be reported completely and without exaggeration
    to allow practising clinicians to draw reasonable
    conclusions.
  • Negative as well as positive results should be
    published or otherwise publicly available.

24
  • Authorship criteria should be considered

25
(No Transcript)
26
Any question?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com