CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN TREASURY COMPANIES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN TREASURY COMPANIES

Description:

PKO BP 37667 9,05 15,9. PGNiG 26351 9,36 4,7. Katowicki Coal 24633 2,7 2,6. Holding ... PKO BP 9,05 37667 15,9. Weglokoks 3,95 24932 0,9. RUCH 3,82 7254 0,5 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: bku5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN TREASURY COMPANIES


1
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN TREASURY COMPANIES
Paris, 26th June 2003
2
Starting point - 12 years of Polish privatisation
  • Year 1990
  • approx. 8,500 state enterprises
  • 31 of GDP generated by the private sector
  • 40 employed in the private sector
  • Foreign Direct Investment - USD 105 m
  • Year 2002
  • 1,800 Treasury companies and state enterprises
  • 72 of GDP generated by the private sector
  • 70 employed in the private sector
  • Foreign Direct Investment - USD 56, 834 million
    USD

3
Mission
  • Completion, by 2006, of the Polish economys
    core transformation processes, resulting in the
    ownership structure similar to that of EU Member
    States, where the share of state assets remains
    at the level of between 10 and 20.

4
State owned assets in numbers
  • 606 State owned enterprises (SMEs)
  • (in 113 privatisation advanced)
  • 1704 State Treasury corporations
  • 0-25 715
  • 25-50 438
  • 50-75 61
  • 75-99 38
  • 100 452

5
Largest state-owned companies
  • Company Employment Proceeds
    Profitability (in mln PLN)
  • PKO BP 37667 9,05 15,9
  • PGNiG 26351 9,36 4,7
  • Katowicki Coal 24633 2,7 2,6
  • Holding
  • Jastrzebska Coal 20487 2,3 0,1
  • Company
  • KWB Belchatów 9758 1,3 4,8

6
Largest state-owned companies
  • Company Proceeds Employment
    Profitability (in mln PLN)
  • PSE 15,12 517 0,3
  • PGNiG 9,36 26351 4,7
  • PKO BP 9,05 37667 15,9
  • Weglokoks 3,95 24932 0,9
  • RUCH 3,82 7254 0,5

7
State owned enterprises and companies covered by
privatisation process by financial performance in
2002
8
Economic indicators of state owned enterprises
and companies covered by privatisation process in
2002
9
State in the economy
  • The volume of state assets and their
    significance for the national economy define the
    weight of responsibility imposed on persons who
    are entrusted with management of those assets,
    as well as responsibility of the government
    administration representatives who appoint those
    persons.

10
Corporate Governance Model
  • The issues discussed in this presentation
    constitute contributing elements of the target
    corporate governance model for companies in which
    the Treasury holds shares.
  • The presented solutions
  • have already been implemented
  • their implementation is at the preliminary stage
  • will be implemented in the near future.

11
Corporate governance objectives
  • Increase of operational effectiveness, management
    efficiency and the value of Treasury companies
  • Rational application of state assets in order to
    ensure proper functioning of the national
    economy
  • Effective use of Treasury ownership rights to
    pursue economic policies of the state
  • Conducting effective privatization in order to
    facilitate fast and efficient transition to the
    desirable ownership structure
  • Achievement of transparency by Treasury companies
    comparable with that of listed companies (strict
    disclosure standards

12
Corporate governance objectives continued
  • Implementation of the above-mentioned objectives
    should be assisted by
  • strengthening of the supervisory boards position
    through more comprehensive application of its
    rights, in accordance with the Polish commercial
    companies code
  • ensuring professionalism of supervisory boards
    members
  • adoption of new financial monitoring standards by
    companies
  • intensification of co-operation with the auditor
    by companies bodies (General Assembly/General
    Meeting, Supervisory Board, Management Board)
  • strengthening of the Ministry of the Treasury
    position and control effectiveness over companies.

13
Supervisory Board as an ownership control body
  • Appoints members of the Management Board in the
    company and defines their remuneration
    proportionally to their performance
  • Analyzes and issues opinions concerning company
    development plans
  • Monitors and controls MB decisions important for
    the company, evaluates the economic and financial
    situation of the company along with MB
    performance
  • Enforces timely implementation of disclosure
    obligations towards the Ministry of the Treasury
  • Promptly reacts to any discovered irregularities
  • Grants the Management Board permission to make
    decisions of key importance for the company
  • Co-operates with the auditor and monitors the
    auditing process

14
Financial monitoring of companies
  • The monitoring system for companies in which the
    Treasury holds shares must allow not only
    assessment of its statutory bodies performance
    but also the ability to react promptly to any
    negative developments, as well as the ability to
    launch recovery activities
  • The monitoring system is to be based on
    questionnaires submitted by companies. The scope
    of disclosure will depend on the companys status
    (sole shareholder companies of the Treasury,
    companies with strategic investors, companies
    with Treasury majority stakes, companies in which
    the Treasury holds residual interest)
  • The Ministry will elaborate detailed guidelines
    for each of those groups indicating main
    supervisory tasks

15
Financial monitoring of companies continued
  • The monitoring system is to enable fast
    elaboration of synthetic analyses and
    establishment of an early warning system
    protecting against potential irregularities
  • Collective information concerning performance of
    public sector entities will be made available to
    the general public
  • Uniform economic financial situation monitoring
    standards and mechanisms elaborated by the
    Ministry of the Treasury will be model solutions
    for all public sector entities, irrespectively of
    which state authority supervises a given entity.

16
The auditors role in the supervision system of
Treasury companies
  • The auditor should be independent and impartial.
    Audit and advisory services must be kept apart
  • The whole auditor selection procedure will be
    conducted by the Supervisory Board
  • The Supervisory Board submits its comments
    concerning issues important for the functioning
    of the company to the auditor and actively
    co-operates with him at all stages of the audit

17
The auditors role in the supervision system of
Treasury companies - continued
  • The Supervisory Board abides by the principle of
    compulsory auditor rotation
  • The chartered accountant who audits the financial
    accounts of the company should be obliged to
    attend the General Assembly / General Meeting,
    providing the remaining attendees with relevant
    explanations and information
  • Under the framework of the early warning
    system, the Supervisory Board should have the
    ability to take advantage of advisory services
    provided by an independent chartered accountant
    in the course of the accounting year.

18
The role of the Ministry of the Treasury in the
supervisory system
  • The key role is played by corporate supervision
    departments. They perform a number of
    organisation, administrative and, above all,
    supervisory tasks as regards Supervisory Boards
    in companies.
  • The main task of the Ministry of the Treasury is
    thorough control and comprehensive evaluation of
    Supervisory Boards performance.
  • An important issue is ensuring an optimum
    composition of Supervisory Boards. Selection of
    appropriate persons, knowledgeable and
    experienced, guarantees proper fulfilment of
    tasks by the boards.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com