Title: Natalie Perlin, Eric Skyllingstad, Roger Samelson, Philip Barbour
1Coastal Upwelling Studies Using a Coupled
Ocean-Atmosphere Model
Natalie Perlin, Eric Skyllingstad, Roger
Samelson, Philip Barbour nperlin_at_coas.oregonstate
.edu skylling_at_coas.oregonstate.edu rsamelson_at_coas
oregonstate.edu barboup_at_engr.orst.edu
College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences,
Oregon State University, USA
2Outline
- Why do we need the ocean-atmosphere coupled
modeling system? - System main components and model coupling
strategy - Numerical study of upwelling and simulations
description - Ocean response to the coupled system
- Atmospheric response to the coupled system
- Summary and future plans
3The need for the ocean-atmosphere coupled system
- Atmospheric models
- - narrow coastal upwelling zone of 10-50 km
offshore is still a sub-grid scale for most
operational numerical weather prediction systems - Trouble the effect of cooler sea surface
temperatures (SST) near the coast is not resolved
directly in the atmospheric models! - Ocean models -
- - usually have neither adequate surface wind
and wind stress data, nor the surface heat fluxes
- Trouble ocean models do not include the
effects of spatially and temporary inhomogeneous
atmospheric forcing that potentially affect ocean
surface boundary layer development - Satellite and in-situ observations
- - show the internal boundary layer
development over the cold water - - indicate that cooler SST-s tend to reduce
the surface wind stress - - turbulence collapse over the cold water
restricts downward momentum transfer to the ocean
surface
4Regional Ocean-Atmosphere Modeling (ROAM) system
main components
- Ocean component ROMS (Regional Ocean
Modeling System), hydrostatic free-surface
primitive-equation model
- Atmospheric component COAMPS (Coupled Ocean-
Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System Hodur,
1997), based on non-hydrostatic fully
compressible dynamics
- Flux coupler MCT (Model Coupling Tookit
Larson et al., 2004), a software tool consisting
of Fortran 90 modules for data exchange between
parallel earth system models to create a parallel
coupled model
Fig.1. ROAM chart, a single-executable modeling
system with its components running in concurrent
mode
5Simulation domain for the numerical study of
upwelling
- Study summertime wind-forced upwelling off
Oregon coast using a fully coupled
ocean-atmosphere model - Horizontal domain is 50 x 20 km, 1-km grid
boxes - Linear shelf slope from 10 m to 300 m at 50 km
offshore - Ocean vertical grid has 40 layers, surface to
bottom - Atm. vertical grid has 42 layers, surface to
over 9 km - Atm. model time step is 3 s, ocean time step is
300 s - Ocean initialization from the profiles of T and
S that are typical for that time and location
ocean starts at rest - Atmospheric initialization horiz.-homogeneous,
from chosen temperature and moisture profiles - Atm. pressure gradient is maintained constant
during the simulation, and is computed from 15
m/s northerly winds - Periodic N-S boundary conditions in both atm.
and ocean models the domain becomes a periodic
channel - Open W-E boundary conditions eastern wall in
ROMS - LMD mixing in ROMS, with surface and bottom KPP
Fig. 2. Atmospheric potential temp., water vapor
mixing ratio, ocean temp. and salinity profiles
that are used for models initialization
Fig. 3. Ocean bathymetry W-E
6Effects of incomplete data exchange between ocean
and atmosphere models
- Fully coupled model system provides the following
data exchange between its components every 300 s
(every ocean model time step) - wind stress from the atmospheric model to the
ocean model - ocean SST update from the ocean to the
atmospheric model - latent, sensible heat fluxes, longwave and
shortwave/solar radiation from the atmospheric to
the ocean model
simulation simulation atm. wind stress passed ocean SST passed to the atm. heat flxs. exchange, solar radiation passed to the
name to the ocean atmosphere except solar rad. ocean
1 W-ths yes no no no
2 WT-hs yes yes no no
3 WTH-s yes yes yes no
4 WTHS yes yes yes yes
Table 1. Summary of the differences of four
simulation to study the effects of incomplete
data exchange between the models
7Ocean model results Sea Surface Temperature
response
- Fully coupled case (red) has its lowest SST
extending to the inshore points - Non-coupled case (black) has greatest
difference between its lowest SST and that at the
inshore point - When solar radiation is included (red), gradual
heating of the surface is well noticed at
offshore point - Upwelling effect starts sooner at the coastal
point when heat flux exchange is included - In non-coupled case (black) upwelling at the
coast starts later, with rapid drop of SST
8Ocean model results temperature and velocity
cross-sections
W-ths
WT-hs
WTH-s
WTHS
Fig. 6. Ocean temperature (left), v-velocity
(center), and u-velocity (right) cross-sections
in the end of the simulation, 72-h forecast.
- Upslope propagation of the upwelling front
extends further inshore in fully coupled case
(bottom panel) - Stronger temperature and momentum vertical
gradients yield in the fully coupled case in the
shallow regions (5 km offshore) - Southward surface jet in non-coupled case
extends deeper, but more horizontally limited - Southward sfc. jet in fully coupled case is more
shallow, broadening horizontally - Ekman layer is thinner in the fully coupled
case, with higher offshore velocities
9Atmospheric model results wind stress, wind
stress curl, and Ekman transport
Fig. 7. Atm. model wind stress, wind stress
curl, and computed cumulative offshore Ekman
transport
Ekman pumping at the offshore location
Coastal Ekman transport at the ocean boundary
Cumulative Ekman transport at the offshore
location
- Two-fold decrease of the meridional wind stress
near the coast as compared to its offshore values
lead to strong wind stress curl in the nearshore
in the coupled cases - Offshore Ekman transport computed from the
atmospheric wind stress differs nearly two-fold
at the coast as a result of this wind stress
decrease - Wind stress curl has such an effect that
cumulative offshore Ekman transport at the
western boundary of the domain becomes of the
similar value for all the simulations
10Atmospheric model internal boundary layer
development
Figure 9. Cross-section of the potential temp.
(contours) and v-wind (color) in the end of 72- h
run, fully coupled case
Figure 8. Vertical profiles of potential temp. at
three offshore locations, 72-h forecast for four
simulations. Open circles show the surface
temperatures in the atmospheric model
- Well mixed marine boundary layer forms in all
cases, with the capping inversion at the
reasonable height (close to the observed) - Internal boundary layer forms only in the
coupled cases, and is defined best in the fully
coupled case - Region of stronger winds forms below the
inversion and over the cooler coastal waters
Figure 10. Similar variables as above, observed
off Oregon coast during the COAST experiment on
July 24-25, 2001. Courtesy of John Bane, UNC.
11Summary
- Coupled ocean-atmosphere simulations demonstrated
qualitative improvement of the model results in a
study of coastal upwelling - Cooler upwelled water penetrates further inshore
in the fully coupled simulations lower SST are
then found in the nearshore shallow regions - Fully coupled case produces oceanic southward
surface jet that is more shallow but horizontally
broader, more shallow Ekman layer - Internal boundary layer develops in the
atmospheric marine boundary layer over the colder
waters during the coupled simulation, in response
to ocean upwelling - Increase of southward flow below the marine layer
inversion and above the cold water supports the
conception of turbulent collapse that restricts
downward momentum transfer
Future plans
- Westward extension of the ocean domain, include
shelf break - Include coastal land and coastal topography
- Include alongshore variations in coastline,
topography, and bathymetry - Use different model resolutions for the ocean
and atmospheric models - Include realistic topography and bathymetry of
the US West coast - Include fresh water sources, as Columbia river
plume