Implementing the GOLD Ontology in FIELD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Implementing the GOLD Ontology in FIELD

Description:

User B: committed to the tool, in a hurry. use the term, don't contact the ontology team. User C: not committed to the tool, not in a hurry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: laurab174
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implementing the GOLD Ontology in FIELD


1
Implementing the GOLD Ontology in FIELD
  • A user perspective

Laura Buszard-Welcher EMELD / WSU lbwelch_at_wayne.e
du
2
Building an Ontology
  • Top down approach
  • Add everything we can think of
  • Bottom up approach
  • Search through grammars to find things we might
    not have thought of
  • Have field linguists test the ontology to see if
    it can accommodate the languages they study

3
Expected Change in Number of Added Concepts
During Test Phase
4
Ontological concepts added to accommodate aspects
of Potawatomi inflection
  • Animacy
  • Person obviative
  • Case non-grammatical diminutive, pejorative,
    locative
  • Polarity positive and negative
  • Clause type main and subordinate

5
Anticipating Gaps
  • Tools like FIELD and ELAN can be very useful for
    expanding an ontology bottom up
  • However, GOLD is not currently extensible by the
    user within FIELD
  • These tools should have a built-in means of
    facilitating communication between the user and
    the ontology design team

6
Square Peg, Round Hole Issues
7
The concept is there, but isnt a best fit
  • User A committed to the tool, not in a hurry
  • contact the ontology team to work out the issue
  • User B committed to the tool, in a hurry
  • use the term, dont contact the ontology team
  • User C not committed to the tool, not in a
    hurry
  • dont use the tool, maybe send a message to the
    ontology team
  • User D not committed to the tool, in a hurry
  • See ya!
  • Retain users and make the relationship most
    productive by allowing comments to be added to
    every mapping in the language setup

8
Mystery Morphemes
9
Other Idiosyncracies of Inflection
10
Collapsed Paradigms in FIELD
11
User-Defined Subcategories
  • Allow users to define language-specific
    subcategories within defined ontological mappings
  • Comment fields would allow the user to specify
    the reason for the subcategory
  • This allows for limited user extensibility
  • Problem how do you constrain this?
  • Communication interface and monitoring would
    allow ontology team to examine and study these
    subcategories to determine whether they should be
    incorporated into the ontology.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com