RF Exposure Evaluation for Amateur Radio Operators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

RF Exposure Evaluation for Amateur Radio Operators

Description:

tribander at 50 ft, located 45 feet from the shack, 55 feet from property line ... This antenna is 67 ft from the shack and 74 ft from the property line, so ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: mtar
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RF Exposure Evaluation for Amateur Radio Operators


1
RF Exposure Evaluation for Amateur Radio Operators
  • Marc C. Tarplee, Ph.D.
  • Technical Coordinator, SC Section

2
Overview
  • This presentation is meant to be a brief
    introduction to RF exposure (RFE) rules
    promulgated by the FCC in1998 and RFE evaluation
    as it applies to amateur stations.
  • For a comprehensive treatment of the FCC rules
    and evaluation techniques, see RF Exposure and
    You, by Ed Hare, W1RFI. The book is available
    from ARRL for 15.

3
A Brief Review of the FCC RF Exposure Rules
4
The FCCs RF Exposure Rules
  • On 1 January 1998, new FCC rules regarding RF
    Exposure (RFE) went into effect.
  • RFE rules were not new the first FCC rules for
    RFE date back to 1985.
  • The new rules no longer exempted amateurs from
    MPE limits.
  • The rules set new limits on the maximum
    permissible exposure (MPE) allowed from radio
    transmitters.

5
Major Points of the New Rules
  • Set RF exposure limits that are consistent with
    the manner in which the human body absorbs RF.
  • Require stations regulated by the FCC to meet the
    guidelines or file an environmental assessment.
  • Permit amateurs to perform their own evaluation
    of their station.
  • Provide categorical exemptions from RFE
    evaluation for stations whose power, frequency,
    duty cycle, etc. are such that compliance may be
    assumed.

6
RF Environments
  • The FCC rules define two classes of RF
    environments
  • Controlled an environment in which people are
    aware of their RF exposure and are able to take
    action to reduce their exposure if necessary.
    Exposure in this environment is averaged over a 6
    minute period.
  • Uncontrolled an environment accessible by the
    general public, who may not be aware of their RF
    exposure. Exposure in this environment is
    averaged over a 30 minute period.

7
RF Environments
  • Typically, the controlled environment is an
    amateurs residence and yard.
  • The uncontrolled environment is everything else

8
RF Exposure Limits
Freq Range (MHz) Controlled Environment (6 minute average) Controlled Environment (6 minute average) Controlled Environment (6 minute average) Uncontrolled Environment (30 minute average) Uncontrolled Environment (30 minute average) Uncontrolled Environment (30 minute average)
Freq Range (MHz) E Field strength (V/m) H Field strength (A/m) Power Density (mW/cm2) E Field strength (V/m) H Field strength (A/m) Power Density (mW/cm2)
0.3- 3 614 1.63 100 ------ ------ ------
3 - 30 1842/f 4.89/f 900/f 2 ------ ------ ------
0.3-1.34 ------ ------ ------ 614 1.63 100
1.34-30 ------ ------ ------ 824/f 2.19/f 180/f 2
30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 27.5 0.073 0.2
300-1500 ------ ------ f/300 ------ ------ f/1500
gt1500 ------ ------ 5 ------ ------ 1.0
  • Note that the limits are field strength limits,
    not power limits!!

9
MPE Chart
10
Field Strength vs. Power
  • Although the limits are given in terms of field
    strength, it is possible to relate them to
    transmitted power and the distance from the
    measurement point to the antenna, quantities
    which most amateurs are able to measure.
  • The FCCs OET Bulletin 65 contains numerous
    tables for this purpose, so it is not necessary
    to directly measure the field strength.

11
Time-Weighted Averages
  • The limits are time-weighted averages.
  • The exposure is averaged over the specified time
    period to get the average value.
  • Here is an example
  • A person is exposed for 4 minutes to an electric
    field of 700 V/m. What is the time-weighted
    exposure in a controlled environment?
  • Solution
  • Avg RFE (Field strengthtime)/weighting period
  • (7004)/6 2800/6 467 V/m

12
Time-Weighted Averages
  • The example can be reworked for the uncontrolled
    environment, for which the weighting period is 30
    minutes
  • Solution
  • Avg RFE (Field strengthtime)/weighting period
  • (7004)/30 2800/30 93 V/m

13
Exemptions from Evaluation
  • There are 4 categorical exemptions for amateur
    stations
  • Amateur stations whose PEP antenna input power is
    less than that shown in the table on the next
    page.
  • Amateur repeaters whose ERP is 500 W or less.
  • Amateur repeaters with antennas not mounted on
    buildings, if the antenna is located more than 10
    m (32 ft 9 5/8 in) above ground.
  • Amateur mobile and portable hand-held stations
    using push-to-talk of equivalent operation.

14
Power Limits for Amateur RFE Evaluation Exemption
Bands Upper Power Limit (PEP)
160m 40m 500 W
30m 425 W
20m 225 W
17m 125 W
15m 100 W
12m 75 W
10m 1.25 m 50 W
70cm 70 W
33cm 150 W
23 cm 200 W
13 cm and above 250 W
  • Input power to the antenna

15
Amateur Station RFE Evaluation
16
The Evaluation Process
  • Determine whether the station meets the standard
    for a categorical exemption on any of the bands
    of operation, and exclude these bands.
  • Determine which evaluation technique will be
    used
  • Tables developed from far-field power density
    formulas
  • Tables developed from antenna modeling
  • Modeling of the actual antenna farm
  • Graphs made from power-density formulas
  • Field strength software
  • Calibrated field strength methods
  • Select a method for determining RF power
  • PEP
  • Time weighted average

17
RFE Evaluation Example
  • We will make an evaluation of station N4UFP using
    tables developed from the far-field power density
    formulas.
  • Evaluation will be done using PEP power and
    average power.
  • The PEP power/far-field table approach is very
    conservative and is the easiest to do, thus it
    should be done first.

18
Station N4UFP
  • 160m/80m/75m/40m
  • vertical loops 40 feet from shack, 40 feet from
    property line
  • Max power 1000 W SSB/500 CW
  • 20,15,10m
  • tribander at 50 ft, located 45 feet from the
    shack, 55 feet from property line
  • Max power 1000 W SSB/500 CW
  • 6m
  • 5 element yagi up 54 feet, located 45 feet from
    shack , 55 feet from property line
  • Max power 300 W
  • 2m
  • 13 element yagi up 57 feet, located 45 feet from
    shack , 55 feet from property line
  • Max power 100 W
  • 70cm
  • 25 element yagi up 60 feet, located 45 feet from
    shack , 55 feet from property line
  • Max power 55 W

19
Step 1 Check for Exemptions
  • Referring to the table on slide 14 of this
    presentation, we see that only N4UFPs 70cm
    operation is exempt from evaluation.

20
PEP/Far Field Evaluation Method
  • The Far-field tables (Table 4a ,Table 4b-VHF, and
    Table 4b-UHF of supplement B to OET Bulletin 65)
    show the minimum compliance distance as a
    function of antenna gain, frequency and antenna
    input power and the type of environment.
  • The minimum compliance distance is the minimum
    distance at which the E and H fields fall below
    the RFE limits shown in slide 7.

21
Measuring Distances
Minimum distance from house to antenna
  • The diagram to the right shows a typical wire
    antenna installation
  • For RFE compliance purposes, the distance to the
    antenna is the shortest distance from the point
    of exposure to the any part of the antenna.

22
Measuring Distances
  • The diagram to the right shows a typical tower
    mounted antenna
  • For RFE compliance purposes, the distance to the
    antenna is the shortest distance from the point
    of exposure to the any part of the antenna.
  • The Pythagorean theorem can be used to compute
    the distance D

23
160m Evaluation
  • Antenna Gain 3 dBi (single quad loop)
  • Max input power 1000 W PEP.
  • Operating frequency 2 MHz
  • From Table 4a , the compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 0.6m 2.0 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 1.06m 3.5 feet
  • Since this antenna is 40 feet from the shack and
    40 feet from the property line, N4UFPs 160m
    operation is in compliance

24
80/75m Evaluation
  • Antenna Gain 3 dBi (single quad loop)
  • Max input power 1000 W PEP.
  • Operating frequency 4 MHz
  • From Table 4a , the compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 0.9m 3.0 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 1.9m 6.2 feet
  • Since this antenna is 40 feet from the shack and
    40 feet from the property line, N4UFPs 80/75m
    operation is in compliance

25
40m Evaluation
  • Antenna Gain 3 dBi (single quad loop)
  • Max input power 1000 W PEP.
  • Operating frequency 7.3 MHz
  • From Table 4a , the compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 1.6m 5.2 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 3.5m 11.5 feet
  • Since this antenna is 40 feet from the shack and
    40 feet from the property line, N4UFPs 40m
    operation is in compliance

26
20m Evaluation
  • Antenna Gain 9 dBi (3-el Yagi)
  • Max input power 1000 W PEP.
  • Operating frequency 14.35 MHz
  • From Table 4a , the compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 6.1m 20 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 13.6m 44.6 feet
  • This antenna is 50 ft above ground and the tower
    is 45 ft from the shack, so the distance to the
    shack is sqrt(502452) sqrt(25002025)
    sqrt(4525) 67 ft.
  • By similar reasoning, the distance to the
    property line is 74 ft
  • N4UFPs 20 m operation is in compliance.

27
15m Evaluation
  • Antenna Gain 9 dBi (3-el Yagi)
  • Max input power 1000 W PEP.
  • Operating frequency 21.45 MHz
  • From Table 4a , the compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 9.1m 29.8 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 20.3m 66.6 feet
  • This antenna is 67 ft from the shack and 74 ft
    from the property line
  • N4UFPs 15 m operation is in compliance.

28
10m Evaluation
  • Antenna Gain 9 dBi (3-el Yagi)
  • Max input power 1000 W PEP.
  • Operating frequency 29.7 MHz
  • From Table 4a , the compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 12.6m 41.3 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 28.2m 92.5 feet
  • This antenna is 67 ft from the shack and 74 ft
    from the property line.
  • N4UFPs 10 m operation may not be in compliance.

29
6m Evaluation
  • Antenna Gain 12 dBi (5-el Yagi)
  • Max input power 300 W PEP (use 500W entries).
  • Operating frequency 50 MHz
  • From Table 4b , the compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 12.7m 41.7 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 28.4m 93.2 feet
  • This antenna is 70 ft from the shack and 77 ft
    from the property line.
  • N4UFPs 10 m operation may not be in compliance.

30
2m Evaluation
  • Antenna Gain 15 dBi (13-el Yagi)
  • Max input power 100 W PEP.
  • Operating frequency 144 MHz
  • From Table 4b , the compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 8m 26.2 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 18m 59.0 feet
  • This antenna is 73 ft from the shack and 79 ft
    from the property line.
  • N4UFPs 2 m operation is in compliance.

31
Average Power/Far Field Evaluation Method
  • N4UFP may not be compliant on the following
    bands 10m and 6m.
  • The FCC rules are based on time weighted
    averages, rather than PEP, so a more detailed
    analysis using average power will be made for
    these bands.
  • Note that the simple evaluation using PEP is very
    conservative a station compliant using PEP will
    always be compliant using the average power.

32
Determining Average Power
  • Average power is given by
  • Pavg (PEP)(Duty Factor)(time)/(weighting
    period)
  • To be conservative, we will assume
  • That CW is the dominant mode of operation. Then
    the duty cycle 0.4
  • That transmissions are approximately 3 minutes in
    length with 3 minute listening periods in
    between.

33
10 m Avg. Power Evaluation
  • The maximum PEP on 10m 1000 W with gain 9 dbi
  • The average power for controlled environments is
  • Pavg,c (1000)(0.4)(3)/6 200 W
  • The average power for uncontrolled environments
    is
  • Pavg,uc (1000)(0.4)(15)/30 200 W
  • There is no 200 W column on Table 4a , so we must
    interpolate between the 100 and 500W columns. The
    compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 5.7m 18.6 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 12.6m 41.3 feet
  • This antenna is 67 ft from the shack and 74 ft
    from the property line, so N4UFPs 10 m operation
    is in compliance.

34
6 m Avg. Power Evaluation
  • The maximum PEP on 6m 300 W with gain 12 dBi
  • The average power for controlled environments is
  • Pavg,c (300)(0.4)(3)/6 60 W
  • The average power for uncontrolled environments
    is
  • Pavg,uc (1000)(0.4)(15)/30 60 W
  • There is no 60 W column on Table 4b , so we must
    interpolate between the 50 and 100W columns. The
    compliance distances are
  • Controlled environment 4.4m 14.4 feet
  • Uncontrolled environment 9.9m 32.3 feet
  • This antenna is 67 ft from the shack and 74 ft
    from the property line, so N4UFPs 6 m operation
    is in compliance.

35
What if I am not compliant?
  • If an amateur station is not compliant on a
    particular band/mode combination, the following
    actions can be taken
  • Reduce transmitter power.
  • Relocate the antenna to place inhabited areas
    beyond the minimum compliance distance.
  • Cease operation on that band/mode

36
Recordkeeping
  • The FCC does not require amateurs to keep a
    written record of their RFE evaluation
  • However, an amateur must be able to demonstrate
    that his/her station is compliant with RFE rules,
    should the FCC request it.

37
Summary
  • You should now be able to make a simple
    evaluation of your amateur station for RFE using
    either PEP or average power techniques.
  • More detailed information can be obtained from
    FCC OET Bulletin 65, or RF Exposure and You
    available from ARRL.
  • I will be happy to assist in your RFE evaluation.

38
RFE Tables from OET Bulletin 65
39
TABLE 4a. (MF/HF Bands)
  • (Developed by Fred Maia, W5YI Group, working in
    cooperation with the ARRL.)
  • Estimated distances in meters from transmitting
    antennas necessary to meet FCC power density
    limits for
  • Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) for either
    occupational/ controlled exposures (Con) or
    general
  • population/uncontrolled exposures (Unc) using
    typical antenna gains for the amateur service and
  • assuming 100 duty cycle and maximum surface
    reflection. Chart represents worst case scenario.
  • Freq. Antenna
  • (MF/HF) Gain Peak Envelope Power (watts)
  • (MHz/Band) (dBi) 100 watts 500 watts 1000
    watts 1500 watts
  • Con. Unc. Con. Unc Con. Unc. Con. Unc.
  • 2.0 (160m) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.7
    0.6 0.8
  • 2.0 (160m) 3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.6
    1.06 0.8 1.2
  • 4.0 (75/80m) 0 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.6
    1.3 0.7 1.6
  • 4.0 (75/80m) 3 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.3 0.9
    1.9 1.0 2.3
  • 7.3 (40m) 0 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.7 1.1
    2.5 1.3 3.0
  • 7.3 (40m) 3 0.5 1.1 1.1 2.5 1.6
    3.5 1.9 4.2
  • 7.3 (40m) 6 0.7 1.5 1.5 3.5 2.2
    4.9 2.7 6.0
  • 10.15 (30m) 0 0.5 1.1 1.1 2.4 1.5
    3.4 1.9 4.2
  • 10.15 (30m) 3 0.7 1.5 1.5 3.4 2.2
    4.8 2.6 5.9
  • 10.15 (30m) 6 1.0 2.2 2.2 4.8 3.0
    6.8 3.7 8.3

40
Table 4b. (VHF Bands)
  • (Developed by Fred Maia, W5YI Group, working in
    cooperation with the ARRL.)
  • Estimated distances in meters from transmitting
    antennas necessary to meet FCC power density
    limits for
  • Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) for either
    occupational/ controlled exposures (Con) or
    general
  • population/uncontrolled exposures (Unc) using
    typical antenna gains for the amateur service and
  • assuming 100 duty cycle and maximum surface
    reflection. Chart represents worst case scenario.
  • Freq Antenna
  • (VHF/UHF) Gain Peak Envelope Power (watts)
  • (MHz/Band) (dBi) 50 watts 100 watts 500 watts
    1000 watts
  • Con. Unc. Con. Unc Con. Unc. Con. Unc.
  • 50 (6m) 0 1.0 2.3 1.4 3.2 3.2
    7.1 4.5 10.1
  • 50 (6m) 3 1.4 3.2 2.0 4.5 4.5
    10.1 6.4 14.3
  • 50 (6m) 6 2.0 4.5 2.8 6.4 6.4
    14.2 9.0 20.1
  • 50 (6m) 9 2.8 6.4 4.0 9.0 9.0
    20.1 12.7 28.4
  • 50 (6m) 12 4.0 9.0 5.7 12.7 12.7
    28.4 18.0 40.2
  • 50 (6m) 15 5.7 12.7 8.0 18.0 18.0 40.2
    25.4 56.8
  • 144 (2m) 0 1.0 2.3 1.4 3.2 3.2
    7.1 4.5 10.1
  • 144 (2m) 3 1.4 3.2 2.0 4.5 4.5
    10.1 6.4 14.3
  • 144 (2m) 6 2.0 4.5 2.8 6.4 6.4
    14.2 9.0 20.1
  • 144 (2m) 9 2.8 6.4 4.0 9.0 9.0
    20.1 12.7 28.4

41
Table 4b. (UHF Bands)
  • (Developed by Fred Maia, W5YI Group, working in
    cooperation with the ARRL.)
  • Estimated distances in meters from transmitting
    antennas necessary to meet FCC power density
    limits for
  • Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) for either
    occupational/ controlled exposures (Con) or
    general
  • population/uncontrolled exposures (Unc) using
    typical antenna gains for the amateur service and
  • assuming 100 duty cycle and maximum surface
    reflection. Chart represents worst case scenario.
  • Freq Antenna
  • (VHF/UHF) Gain Peak Envelope Power (watts)
  • (MHz/Band) (dBi) 50 watts 100 watts 500 watts
    1000 watts
  • Con. Unc. Con. Unc Con. Unc. Con. Unc.
  • 450 (70cm) 3 1.2 2.6 1.6 3.7 3.7
    8.2 5.2 11.6
  • 450 (70cm) 6 1.6 3.7 2.3 5.2 5.2 11.6
    7.4 16.4
  • 450 (70cm) 9 2.3 5.2 3.3 7.3 7.3 16.4
    10.4 23.2
  • 450 (70cm) 12 3.3 7.3 4.6 10.4 10.4 23.2
    14.7 32.8
  • 902 (33cm) 0 0.6 1.3 0.8 1.8 1.8
    4.1 2.6 5.8
  • 902 (33cm) 3 0.8 1.8 1.2 2.6 2.6
    5.8 3.7 8.2
  • 902 (33cm) 6 1.2 2.6 1.6 3.7 3.7
    8.2 5.2 11.6
  • 902 (33cm) 9 1.6 3.7 2.3 5.2 5.2
    11.6 7.3 16.4
  • 902 (33cm) 12 2.3 5.2 3.3 7.3 7.3
    16.4 10.4 23.2
  • 1240 (23cm) 0 0.5 1.1 0.7 1.6 1.6
    3.5 2.2 5.0

42
TABLE 4a.
  • (Developed by Fred Maia, W5YI Group, working in
    cooperation with the ARRL.)
  • Estimated distances in meters from transmitting
    antennas necessary to meet FCC power density
    limits for
  • Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) for either
    occupational/ controlled exposures (Con) or
    general
  • population/uncontrolled exposures (Unc) using
    typical antenna gains for the amateur service and
  • assuming 100 duty cycle and maximum surface
    reflection. Chart represents worst case scenario.
  • Freq. Antenna
  • (MF/HF) Gain Peak Envelope Power (watts)
  • (MHz/Band) (dBi) 100 watts 500 watts 1000
    watts 1500 watts
  • Con. Unc. Con. Unc Con. Unc. Con. Unc.
  • 2.0 (160m) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.7
    0.6 0.8
  • 2.0 (160m) 3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.6
    1.06 0.8 1.2
  • 4.0 (75/80m) 0 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.6
    1.3 0.7 1.6
  • 4.0 (75/80m) 3 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.3 0.9
    1.9 1.0 2.3
  • 7.3 (40m) 0 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.7 1.1
    2.5 1.3 3.0
  • 7.3 (40m) 3 0.5 1.1 1.1 2.5 1.6 3.5
    1.9 4.2
  • 7.3 (40m) 6 0.7 1.5 1.5 3.5 2.2
    4.9 2.7 6.0
  • 10.15 (30m) 0 0.5 1.1 1.1 2.4 1.5
    3.4 1.9 4.2
  • 10.15 (30m) 3 0.7 1.5 1.5 3.4 2.2
    4.8 2.6 5.9
  • 10.15 (30m) 6 1.0 2.2 2.2 4.8 3.0
    6.8 3.7 8.3

43
Table 4b. (VHF Bands)
  • (Developed by Fred Maia, W5YI Group, working in
    cooperation with the ARRL.)
  • Estimated distances in meters from transmitting
    antennas necessary to meet FCC power density
    limits for
  • Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) for either
    occupational/ controlled exposures (Con) or
    general
  • population/uncontrolled exposures (Unc) using
    typical antenna gains for the amateur service and
  • assuming 100 duty cycle and maximum surface
    reflection. Chart represents worst case scenario.
  • Freq Antenna
  • (VHF/UHF) Gain Peak Envelope Power (watts)
  • (MHz/Band) (dBi) 50 watts 100 watts 500 watts
    1000 watts
  • Con. Unc. Con. Unc Con. Unc. Con. Unc.
  • 50 (6m) 0 1.0 2.3 1.4 3.2 3.2
    7.1 4.5 10.1
  • 50 (6m) 3 1.4 3.2 2.0 4.5 4.5
    10.1 6.4 14.3
  • 50 (6m) 6 2.0 4.5 2.8 6.4 6.4
    14.2 9.0 20.1
  • 50 (6m) 9 2.8 6.4 4.0 9.0 9.0
    20.1 12.7 28.4
  • 50 (6m) 12 4.0 9.0 5.7 12.7 12.7
    28.4 18.0 40.2
  • 50 (6m) 15 5.7 12.7 8.0 18.0 18.0 40.2
    25.4 56.8
  • 144 (2m) 0 1.0 2.3 1.4 3.2 3.2
    7.1 4.5 10.1
  • 144 (2m) 3 1.4 3.2 2.0 4.5 4.5
    10.1 6.4 14.3
  • 144 (2m) 6 2.0 4.5 2.8 6.4 6.4
    14.2 9.0 20.1
  • 144 (2m) 9 2.8 6.4 4.0 9.0 9.0
    20.1 12.7 28.4
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com