Empirical Analysis of Parole Violations: California - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Empirical Analysis of Parole Violations: California

Description:

What factors predict parole violations and revocations? ... Robbery. 78. 129. Homicide. Board. Courts. Offense. Return Times are Much Shorter for Board Returns ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: rese175
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Empirical Analysis of Parole Violations: California


1
Empirical Analysis of Parole Violations
California
  • Conference on Back-end Sentencing and Technical
    Parole Violations
  • Stanford University
  • November 4, 2006

2
How are parolees returned to prison?
Parole violations
Prison returns
Local Court Convictions
Board Returns
Criminal
Noncriminal
3
Research Questions
  • What factors predict parole violations and
    revocations?
  • How are cases sorted to the courts and the
    parole board?
  • Where does the discretion lie in decision-making
    about violations and revocations?

4
NIJ California Parole Violation Study
  • 261,883 Parolees Observed Weekly for 2003-2004
  • 344,183 Violations
  • 155,562 Returns to Prison
  • Individual, Contextual, and Institutional Factors

5
Violation Risks
  • 75 of parolees who have been released 6 or more
    times violate within 200 days of freedom
  • Churners make up about 10 of the California
    parolee population
  • 45 of first releases have violated within the
    first 800 days

6
How do parole returns impact prisons?
7
Board Returns do not Comprise a Large Share of
the Prison Population
8
Consequences
  • Back-end sentences are not the major contributor
    to the current population crisis
  • They do produce other negative consequences
  • Transaction Costs
  • Increase criminogenic propensities

9
Discretion lies mostly with the Parole Board
76
74
86
10
Criminal Returns Increased Through the 1990s
11
Different Offenses are Routed Through the Board
and Courts
12
Most Criminal Returns are for the Least Serious
Violations
13
Many Serious Offenses go through the Board
14
Return Times are Much Shorter for Board Returns
15
Summary
  • Churning
  • Population Crisis
  • Increased Transaction Costs and Enhanced
    Criminogenic Propensities
  • Seriousness
  • Board Discretion
  • Tripartite Focus Agents, Board, and DAs

16
Contact information
  • Ryken Grattet, Ph.D.
  • Department of Sociology
  • University of California
  • Davis, California 95616
  • Tel (530)754-6137
  • E-mail jenness_at_uci.edu

Joan Petersilia, Ph.D. Department of
Criminology, Law Society University of
California Irvine, California 92697-7080 Tel
(949) 824-6438 E-mail petersilia_at_stevet.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com