Title: Some Issues in Accounting and Implications for FSA
1Some Issues in Accounting and Implications for FSA
2Topics
- Revenue and expense recognition
- Inventory cost-flow assumption
- Accounting for fixed assets
- Accounting for intangible assets
3Revenue recognition
- Considered one of the most important issues in
financial reporting by policy makers - Despite many rulings, firms appear to have some
discretion on when and how they recognize
revenues - Important to an analyst because an analyst has to
determine the quality and the sustainability of
revenues over time
4Regulatory concern
5Revenue recognition
- Under the accrual basis of accounting, the
principles are clear Recognize revenue when - Services are provided (all or substantial
portion), and - Benefits are realized or realizable
- Issues arise with respect to the determination of
- What constitutes a service
- When services (or a substantial portion of
services) have been provided - What is considered realizable
- Analyst must assess whether these determinations
are appropriate - Time of sale recognition most common
6Issues with time of sale recognition
- May be too early if
- High uncollectible receivables
- Increase in receivable days outstanding
- High returned goods
- Excessive warranty expenses
- The practice is to book sales upon receipt of a
customer order, and not the delivery of the
product
7Expense recognition
- The matching principle
- Expense costs directly associated with revenues
in the period in which revenues are recognized - Otherwise, treat them as period expenses
- Again, firms have some latitude with respect to
many items such as - Depreciation
- Bad debt expense
- Warranty expense
8Book examples
- Xerox
- Bundles
- Revenues from leasing copiers
- Revenues from maintenance services
- Photocopying paper (up to minimum usage)
- Financing
- What should Xerox be doing?
- Analyst must have a good understanding of a
companys revenue recognition methods - Metropolitan Life Insurance company
- Receive cash from premiums and investments
- Invest in readily marketable securities
- Issues
- When to recognize revenue and what to do with
unrealized gains/losses from marketable
securities? - Expenses are selling and administrative costs and
the face value of the policy. How should these
expenses be recognized?
9Examples
- Microstrategy (Software company)
- Providers of customized software
- Two revenue components
- Use of software over the contract period
- Service in the form of training
- What are the revenue recognition issues?
- Walgreen
- Recognition of rebates from suppliers
- Recognize rebates when realized or based on
estimates?
10Revenue recognition when cash collectibility is
uncertain
- Typically delay revenue recognition when the cash
is received, or when the uncertainty goes down
substantially. Examples - Installment method
- Cost recovery method
11Income recognition other than at the time of sale
- Income recognition for long-term contractors
- Percentage-of-completion method
- Income recognition spread over the period that
the contract spans - Contract in process account reflects this income
recognition - Completed contract method
- Income recognition at the end of the contract
period - Contract in process account valued at cost
- When to use each method?
12More on managing revenues
- Analysts often issue both earnings and revenue
forecasts. Market appears to focus on both of
them - Earnings announcements that provide a discussion
of both earnings and revenue performance are easy
to find. The following are two such examples - ..At 21 billion, IBMs first quarter revenue
rose 8.8 percent from the 19.3 billion it
reported during the same period a year earlier
and was slightly above the 20.8 billion analysts
had generally expected, according to the First
Call survey. (IBM meets the Street, CNNFN,
April 18, 2001, 439PM ET). - ..HP posted sales of 12.0 billion in the
year-ago quarter, and 11.9 billion in its first
fiscal quarter. First Calls forecast had called
for the companys revenues to rise to 12.2
billion in the current quarter. (HP warns about
2Q results, CNNFN, April 18, 2001, 1115AM ET). - Evidence indicates that
- Typically, market reacts positively if firms meet
earnings forecasts, but not always! - Electronic Data Systems announced a significant
increase in 4th quarter earnings relative to the
previous year. The earnings exceeded the
analysts consensus earnings forecast by two
cents per share. However, on the day of the
announcement when the DJIA increased 119 points
(1.2), the companys stock price decreased 4.7
percent. The reason stated by analysts was that
revenues increased by only 13 percent, which was
below expectations of 17 percent.
13More on managing revenues
- Rees and Sivaramakrishnan (2005)
- There is a significant increase in market
response to meeting earnings forecasts when
revenue forecasts are met. - There is a significant reduction is market
response to meeting earnings forecasts when
revenue forecasts are not met. - There is a significant attenuation in market
penalty to missing earnings forecasts when
revenue forecasts are met. - There is a significant increase is market penalty
to missing earnings forecasts when revenue
forecasts are not met. - No wonder managers are worried about meeting
revenue benchmarks
14Regulatory response
- Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101 issued by SEC
- To curb premature recognition of revenues as a
mechanism for managing earnings to meet Wall
Street Expectations - Improper revenue recognition is the largest
single issue in restatements of financial
statements - Requires restatements by focusing on revenue
recognition practices
15Regulatory response
16Regulatory response
17Regulatory response
- Question Is there a detectable difference in a
firms ability to manage earnings before and
after the implementation of SAB 101? - A study by Altumoro, Beatty and Weber (2002)
18Altumoro, Beatty and Weber (2002)
- Study a sample of firms that recorded cumulative
effects adjustments because of SAB 101 - Compare with sample of firms matched on industry
and assets that did not have to restate (control
firms) - Find that
- Restating firms had greater analyst following
- Restating firms had a stronger incentive to
engage in earnings management - Restating firms were less likely to miss
important earnings benchmarks prior to SAB 101 - Approximately one third of the firms might have
missed the earnings benchmark. - Suggests that these firms were prematurely
recognizing revenues - Interestingly, the predictive ability of earnings
with respect to future cash flows decreased after
the implementation of SAB 101!
19Firms response to SAB 101
- Evidence indicates that
- Managers delay recognition of revenue using both
accounts receivable and deferred revenue when
pre-managed earnings exceed earnings benchmarks
by a large margin - Managers accelerate recognition of revenue when
pre-managed earnings miss earnings benchmarks by
a lit - It appears there is still a lot of grey area
subsequent to SAB 101!
20Inventory cost-flow assumptions
- Why do we need to make an assumption about
inventory cost flows? - FIFO, LIFO, Weighted average
- FIFO
- Ending inventory closest to current replacement
costs - COGS is understated
- LIFO
- COGS stated using more recent prices
- Ending inventory at older prices
- SEC requires footnote disclosure of the extent to
which LIFO inventory valuation is less than
inventory valuation using FIFO or current cost. - In periods of rising prices income will be higher
under FIFO than under LIFO, but ending inventory
will be valued higher under LIFO than under FIFO,
but for one exception (?) - Firms prefer LIFO for tax purposes, but if they
choose LIFO for tax purposes, they must also
choose LIFO for financial reporting purposes. - Yet, many firms adopt FIFO.
21What do LIFO adopters look like?
- Firms which face rapidly increasing prices of
inputs - Firms facing cyclical demand patterns and have to
manage inventory accordingly. LIFO, by matching
current inventory price to sales, helps more in
smoothing fluctuations - Motivated by tax savings
- Industry practice
- Larger firms tend to adopt LIFO
- Why would firms adopt FIFO? Why would LIFO firms
switch to FIFO?
22How does the market react when firms change
cost-flow assumptions?
- Recall that if a firm chooses LIFO for tax
purposes, it must also choose LIFO for financial
reporting purposes - A switch to LIFO results in potential tax
savings. This should evoke a positive market
reaction - A switch to LIFO results in a lower income. If
the market is fixated on income to evaluate
companies, this may be viewed negatively - Mixed evidence on this issue. The best answer
perhaps is, it depends?
23Points for analysis
- How should we calculate inventory turnover
ratios? Using FIFO or Using LIFO? - Be careful when comparing inventory turnover
ratios across firms if they use different
assumptions - Inventory cost-flow assumption also affects the
current ratio
24Earnings quality and cost flow assumption
- Cost of goods sold is computed using more recent
prices under LIFO - Thus, LIFO COGS is more closely related to
replacement costs - It is a better measure of the opportunity cost
which is especially relevant for a going concern
COGS represents the cost of replacing resources - Market return seems to more closely follow LIFO
based income that FIFO based income - This indicates that the market views LIFO based
earnings as being of higher quality - On the other hand, FIFO inventory values in the
balance sheet are of higher quality. Why? - Difference is not much when
- Inventory is fast moving
- Prices are stable over time
- Analysts should be aware enough
- To eliminate holding gains arising from dipping
into LIFO LAYERS
25Accounting for intangibles
- Intangible assets include trade name, brand name,
patents, customer base, goodwill - Expense immediately costs incurred to develop
intangibles - Capitalize expenditures made to acquire
intangible assets - Amortize assets known to have finite useful lives
(such as when specified in contractual
arrangements) - Goodwill recognized only through acquisitions. No
amortization of goodwill. Subject to impairment
tests. - Typically, balance sheet understates the value of
intangible assets.
26Accounting for RD Software development
- Research and development
- As we know, RD needs to be expensed.
- There is never an asset on the balance sheet
indicating potential future benefits - Why?
- For some companies RD expenses can be extremely
high - In steady state it may not matter
- For growing firms, this may be troublesome.
- Software development
- The rules are quite fuzzy for software
development costs - Expense until technological feasibility is
established - Amortize any additional development costs
subsequently - Allows room for discretion
- IBM, Microsoft, Adobe examples in the book.