Maximal Cliques in UDG: Polynomial Approximation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Maximal Cliques in UDG: Polynomial Approximation

Description:

Dept of EECS, UC Berkeley. Olivier Goldschmidt, OPNET Technologies ... EECS, UC Berkeley. INOC 2005. Unit Disk Graph. Geometric graph on a plane ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: rajarsh3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Maximal Cliques in UDG: Polynomial Approximation


1
Maximal Cliques in UDG Polynomial Approximation
  • Rajarshi Gupta, Jean Walrand
  • Dept of EECS, UC Berkeley
  • Olivier Goldschmidt, OPNET Technologies
  • International Network Optimization Conference
    (INOC 2005)
  • Lisbon, Portugal, March 2005

2
Unit Disk Graph
  • Geometric graph on a plane
  • Two vertices are connected iff their Euclidean
    distance is ? 1
  • Common application in wireless networks

3
UDG in Wireless Networks
  • Wireless nodes are connected if they are within a
    transmission radius
  • Assume all nodes have same transmission power
  • Then underlying graph model is UDG


4
Cliques
  • Cliques in a graph
  • Clique Complete Subgraph
  • Maximal Clique is not a subset of any other
    clique
  • Capacity and cliques
  • Clique Set of nodes that all interfere with
    each other
  • Observe cliques in wireless graphs are local
    structures

5
Problem Formulation
  • Given UDG on a plane
  • Each vertex knows its position
  • Also knows position of neighbors
  • Want to compute all maximal cliques in the
    network

6
General Clique Algorithms
  • Well known problem in Graph Theory
  • Harary, Ross 1957
  • Bierstone 1960s
  • Bron, Kerbosch 1973
  • Given any graph G(V,E), generate all maximal
    cliques
  • Exponential number of maximal cliques in general
    graph
  • So these algorithms are exponential and
    centralized
  • Exponential number of maximal cliques even in UDG
    ?
  • Hence want approximation algorithm that is
  • Localized, Polynomial and Distributed

7
Approximating Maximal Cliques
  • For each edge uv in UDG
  • Length of edge uv duv
  • Output all cliques with edges ? duv
  • This will output all maximal cliques
  • Football Fuv contains all cliques
  • Disk Duv forms a clique
  • Curved Triangles T1uv T2uv form cliques

8
Bands
  • Consider Band of height duv within Fuv
  • For each vertex in Fuv position a band lying on
    the vertex
  • Theorem All cliques in Fuv included in set of
    bands Buv
  • Consider any clique q, and let x be its vertex
    farthest from uv
  • Since x is farthest, all other vertices must lie
    on same side of x as uv
  • But distance from x to all other vertices lt duv
  • Hence all these vertices also lie in this band
  • Note Band Buv may include extra vertices. Hence
    approx algo.

9
Basic Algorithm
  • For small bands, single clique includes all
    vertices
  • Else we try the three cliques we know
  • Need to resort to bands only as a last resort
  • Takes O(?) to generate clique
  • Order of algorithm O(m?2)
  • m number of edges
  • ? max degree of graph
  • Number of cliques O(m?)
  • if duv ? 1/?3
  • output clique Fuv
  • else
  • output cliques Duv, T1uv, T2uv
  • if all vertices in Duv, T1uv or T2uv
  • we are done
  • else
  • output Buv by positioning band at each
    vertex in Fuv

Algorithm is localized and distributed
10
Modified Algorithm
  • Consider shapes D1uv, T11uv, T21uv of dimension 1
    instead of duv
  • These form cliques that are supersets of Duv,
    T1uv, T2uv
  • If duv ? ?3 1, every band is contained in
    either T11uv or T21uv
  • Worst case running time same, but improves
    average case

Modifications if duv ? ?3 - 1 cliques T11uv,
T21uv enough else if all vertices in D1uv,
T11uv, or T21uv we are done else use bands
Buv as before
11
Cliques per Edge
  • Simulation details
  • 10X10 field
  • 100 to 2000 nodes
  • Each point average over 10 simulations
  • Observations
  • ? increases linearly with node density
  • No. of cliques/edge also rises linearly
  • Actual cliques only 1/8 or 1/10 of m?

per edge
12
Clique Computation Methods
  • Four methods of computing
  • d lt 1/?3
  • d lt ?3-1 (modified)
  • D, T1 and T2
  • Bands
  • Observations
  • More bands at denser networks
  • Modified algorithm reduces reliance on bands
  • Left bar Basic algorithm
  • Right bar Modified algorithm

13
Changes in Network
  • Complexity analysis
  • Change affects neighborhood of one/two nodes
  • May have O(?2) edges
  • Recomputing cliques at each edge takes O(?2) time
  • Total algorithm is O(?4)
  • Note that O(?2) ? O(m), so no worse than O(m?2)
  • Want all changes to be handled locally and
    efficiently
  • New vertex O(?4)
  • Delete Vertex O(m?)
  • New Edge O(?4)
  • Delete Edge O(?4)
  • Move Vertex O(?4)

14
Conclusions
  • Motivation
  • Cliques in Unit Disk Graphs common in wireless
    networks
  • Background
  • Number of maximal cliques is exponential
  • Rely on approximation algorithm
  • Algorithm Summary
  • Consider each edge, and find all cliques with
    this as the longest edge
  • Limit clique-forming vertices into characteristic
    shapes
  • Runs in O(m?2) time, generates O(m?) cliques
  • Distributed, localized and polynomial algorithm

15
Questions ?
  • http//www.eecs.berkeley.edu/guptar
  • guptar_at_eecs.berkeley.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com