Case Study 1 Chapter 5 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Case Study 1 Chapter 5

Description:

Carrier Classification. Common Carriers serve general public ... Dual operation as common & contract prohibited. Change in Motor Carrier Regulations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Wmch
Category:
Tags: case | chapter | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Case Study 1 Chapter 5


1
Case Study 1 Chapter 5
  • TL LTL Motor Carrier Cost and Production
    Functions

2
Regulations on Motor Carriers
  • All economic aspects of industry were regulated
    by ICCstarting in 1935
  • Five aspects of regulation
  • Carriers classified by products hauled and
    relationship to shipper
  • Entry controlsvaried by type of carrier
  • Rate controlsspecified when by how much
    carrier rates could be changed
  • Changes in structure of industry through mergers,
    acquisitions and consolidations had to be
    approved by ICC

3
Carrier Classification
  • Common Carriersserve general public
  • Contract Carriersserve specific shippers
  • Private Carriershaul own goods
  • Brokersfacilitate shipments between carriers
    shippersdo not transport goods
  • Exempt Carriersagricultural products,
    newspapers, vehicles used to complement other
    modes (e.g. RR Water), freight forwarders and
    vehicles used to transport people goods in
    connection with air travel

4
Entry Controls
  • Common Carriersentrant had to show
  • proposed service not being provided by existing
    carriers
  • It was fit, willing able to provide service
  • Contract Carriersentrant had to show
  • It was fit, willing able to provide service
  • On entry Certificate of Operation was granted
    which specified
  • Route served, type of service, frequency
    commodity
  • In both cases, Burden of proof on entrant
  • Dual operation as common contract prohibited

5
Change in Motor Carrier Regulations
  • No significant changes in economic regulations
    until late 1970searly 1980s
  • Evidence began to mount that regulation was
    resulting in inefficiency higher costs
  • 1980 MCA specified steps in deregulation
  • Relaxed entry controls
  • Allowed rate flexibility
  • Eased route carriage restrictions
  • Allowed for-hire services by private fleets

6
Effects of Regulation on Costs Technology
  • Focus on two types of Common Carriers
  • Specific Commodity Carriers
  • Firms can carry a specific commodity between
    specific locations
  • Firms may have multiple COs
  • Most shipments are Truck-load (TL) hauls
  • Make extensive use of owner-operators who operate
    under the firms COs
  • General Freight Carriers
  • Serve shippers whose shipments are less than a TL
  • LTL carriers have to combine breakdown
    shipmentsneed facilities and terminal labor
  • Differences in TL LTL carriers suggest
    different technologies and cost relationships

7
Estimating Cost for TL Carriers
  • Estimate a translog flexible cost function
  • ln C(Tp,o) function of four input prices and
    three carrier characteristics
  • C is total cost in 000s and T is ton-miles
  • Characteristics represent carriers technology
  • Avg. load per vehicle (ald) total
    ton-miles/vehicle miles
  • Avg. length of haul (alh) total
    ton-miles/total tons
  • Ins cost per ton-mile (ins) ins spending/total
    ton-miles
  • Inputs are labor, capital, fuel purchased
    transportation

8
Hypothesis 1 CRTS Exists in TL sector
  • ReasonTL approximates a competitive industry
  • Large number of small firmsplus owner operators
  • Small capital requirements
  • Ease of entry
  • Service is relatively homogeneous after
    accounting for technology differences
  • Firms have to reach min LRAC to survive
  • Assuming no economies of network size in TL

9
Hypothesis 2 Input Prices Positively Related to
Total Cost
  • The null hypotheses are
  • Further result is
  • Each input prices coefficient represents its
    share of total cost
  • The sum of shares must equal 1

10
Hypothesis 3 ald alh have negative and ins
has positive effect on Total Cost
  • Each of characteristics reflect different aspect
    of carriers technology
  • Increases in ald implies firm is increasing
    capacity utilization
  • Perhaps by reducing empty backhauls
  • Reduces avg cost, ceteris paribus
  • Increases in alh allows firm to realize economies
    of distance
  • Pick-up and delivery costs are spread over more
    ton-miles
  • Ins used as proxy for amount of handling costs
    required for shipment
  • High-valued, perishable and fragile shipments all
    require more handling and care in loading and
    unloading

11
Estimation ResultsTable 5.5
  • Goodness of fit stats R2 .99
  • All coefficients except alh and ins are
    significant
  • alh doesnt appear to affect total costs this
    may reflect
  • that the start-end access costs are insignificant
    in total costs
  • lack of variation in length of hauls between
    firms
  • that route restrictions imposed by ICC made all
    firms operate in an inefficient and costly manner
  • Insignificant effect of ins could reflect
  • ins is a poor proxy for differences in commodity
    handling cost
  • Inter-firm differences in cost are not affected
    by type of goods shipped
  • Ald is neg and significantimplies that increased
    capital utilization does significantly reduce
    costs

12
CRTS in TL Sector?
  • Coefficient for T is .72 implying that RTS
    1.39, which implies IRTS
  • Test the null hypothesis
  • Reject the null at .05
  • Since RTS gt 1, IRTS
  • Source of IRTS?
  • Been suggested that they are due to regulation
  • TL carriers were more restricted in terms of
    goods allowed than in geographic areas allowed to
    serve
  • Firms with multiple authorities for goods would
    likely have fewer empty backhauls and thus lower
    LRAC
  • In effect, for firms with multiple authorities,
    there are network economies

13
Input Shares and Substitution
  • Input price coefficients show proportion of total
    cost represented by each input
  • Largest share (39) goes to labor
  • Capital accounts for 31, followed by Purchased
    Transport at 18
  • The relatively large share for PT suggests the
    importance of Owner-Operators in this sector
  • Elasticities of Substitution are all positive
  • With exception of PT all are lt 1
  • High Elast of Sub for PT indicate that firms
    respond to changes in prices of any of their
    other inputs by utilizing more O-Os

14
Summary
  • TL sector doesnt appear to operate as a
    competitive industry
  • It exhibits IRTS which means some firms are
    operating at lower LRAC than others
  • If IRTS are result of regulation, then would
    expect CRTS to emerge if deregulated
  • There is substitution among inputs
  • Substitution is greatest wrt purchased inputs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com