Clinical bioequivalence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Clinical bioequivalence

Description:

A manufacturer wishes to change its approved production method for standardized ... Based on the 1993 protocol, the manufacturer proposes to enlist 4 to 6 study ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: cber55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clinical bioequivalence


1
Clinical bioequivalence
2
Specific example
  • A manufacturer wishes to change its approved
    production method for standardized fedweed pollen
    extract
  • CBER acknowledges that existing in vitro potency
    tests will be applicable to the new preparation.
    However, CBER requests that the manufacturer
    demonstrate compositional similarity by parallel
    line bioassay

3
Clinical bioequivalence
4
Clinical bioequivalence
5
Clinical bioequivalence
  • At least 4 subjects are required per assay. One
    or more test extracts are to be compared against
    a reference in each subject.
  • For evaluating compositional differences,
    subjectsselectively sensitive to specific
    allergens in the crude mix should be
    selectedIn order to enhance detection of
    compositional differences, subjects can be
    selected who differ widely (10-10,000 fold) in
    their allergen skin test sensitivityto the test
    of reference extracts.

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Manufacturer proposal
  • Based on the 1993 protocol, the manufacturer
    proposes to enlist 4 to 6 study subjects of
    varying levels of sensitivity to fedweed pollen
  • If the slopes of the two preparations are not
    significantly different in these study subjects,
    the manufacturer will conclude that the two
    preparations are compositionally similar

10
Initial assumptions
  • Mean slope 10
  • Acceptable difference 10 1
  • SD slope 1
  • ? 0.05
  • b 0.2

11
(No Transcript)
12
  • To determine the number of subjects (n) required
    to detect a difference d with confidence a and
    power 1 - b with the two one-sided test approach,
    use the following

13
  • For a 0.05 and b 0.2

14
(No Transcript)
15
Conclusions
  • The failure to demonstrate a difference is not
    sufficient to demonstrate equivalence
  • Given that, for the parallel line bioassay, s ?
    d, the number of study subjects required to
    demonstrate equivalence will usually exceed 4-6

16
Advisory Committee discussion
  • CBER requests that the Committee discuss CBERs
    current approach to clinical bioequivalence
    studies as it applies to allergen extract
    studies.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com