DEALER Distance Education And Learning Repository - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

DEALER Distance Education And Learning Repository

Description:

DEALER. Distance Education And Learning Repository. The First Draft Idea. Zlatan Sabic ... for DEALER. should be. the main principle. in every segment of the project: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: zlatan
Learn more at: https://sites.pitt.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DEALER Distance Education And Learning Repository


1
DEALERDistance Education And Learning Repository
Soros Foundations Open Society Fund Bosnia and
Herzegovina MIT Center Sarajevo
  • The First Draft Idea
  • Zlatan Sabic
  • Sarajevo, July 1998

2
Basic presumption
  • To support educators by interactive distance
    learning technologies
  • WE should NOT think of ways how educators
    SHOULD work, but think instead how educators
    REALLY work
  • What are their PROBLEMS?
  • How can we help solve them?

3
Modern Educators Problems
  • Need for rapid updates in curricula
  • Curricula more complex
  • Audiences more complex
  • High preparation costs
  • Multiple learning sites (class, home..)
  • Technology innovations continuous
  • Teaching cooperation needed to manage complexity

4
Need for rapid updates in curricula
  • Knowledge and technology continuously changing
  • Innovative education demands continuous change in
    course curricula
  • Rapid updates critical
  • PROBLEMS
  • high costs for high quality updates
  • need high quality content
  • need rapid and timely access
  • need digestible formats

5
Curricula more complex
  • Some critical technical content may be needed
    across several courses
  • PROBLEMS
  • core content may be difficult to parse across
    multiple contexts
  • organization of core content within different
    contexts

6
Audiences more complex
  • Even if the content is located only in one
    course, different audiences require different
    approaches
  • PROBLEMS
  • small changes in lessons produce "versions"
    confusion
  • lessons need to be well-organized to recognize
    small differences

7
High preparation costs
  • "Construction" of new courses based on existing
    and new material needs to be fast
  • PROBLEMS
  • too much time removing the updatable core
    lessons from needed context
  • problems with course scope and sequence can
    become critical

8
Multiple learning sites
  • Teachers and students work on computers in
    classrooms and at home
  • Distance learning creates multiple course sites
  • PROBLEMS
  • Different learning environments may need
  • different approaches and materials

9
Technology innovations continuous
  • It is hard to survive as modern and successful
    educators without continuous adopting of new
    technologies
  • PROBLEMS
  • technology dependant teaching materials are too
    time-expensive (need for structure and technology
    conversions)
  • educator has to spend some time to learn the use
    of technology

10
Teaching cooperation
  • The most of the topics are too complex for only
    one educator
  • Cooperation synergy can be very "profitable"
  • PROBLEMS
  • cooperation coordination
  • again context dependance of lessons
  • incompatibility of formats (technology dependance)

11
What to do?
  • Develop smaller units with more complex
    organization
  • Downsize lessons
  • make content loosely coupled with context
  • make content easy to access and update
  • More complex organization
  • use multiple criteria to classify modules
  • faster searches for appropriate lesson
  • design more rapid ways to update curriculum

12
Downsizing lessons
  • Small Can Be Beautiful !
  • A lesson can be constructed using
  • a Learning Module format(comparable to 15 min.-
    1 hour of instruction)
  • Each lesson can contain
  • commercial and/or professionally-created
    materials and/or digitized objects
  • in hardcopy, on the Internet or on CD ROM

13
Continuous innovation creates an instructional
dilemma
  • Classification by topics (Project Scheduling
    Software)
  • more appropriate in dynamic environment and for
    smaller lessons
  • Topics updated often
  • Classification by courses (Project Mgt)
  • more appropriate in static environment and for
    larger lessons

14
Example - Classic Hierarchy Classification by
Courses
  • Course System Analysis and Design
  • System Analysis Methodology Preliminary Analysis
  • Problem Detection
  • ...
  • System Analysis Techniques Interview
  • ...
  • System Design
  • Project Management
  • ...
  • Course Strategic Use of Information Technologies
  • TPS, MIS, DSS Basic Concepts
  • System Analysis (partly)
  • Interview (in different context)
  • Group Technologies (partly Groupware lesson)
  • ...
  • Course Short Seminar on MIS and Groupware
  • MIS Basic Concepts (partly TPS, MIS, DSS lesson)
  • Groupware (partly Group Technologies lesson)

too big
too big
too context sensitive
15
Example - Classic Hierarchy Classification by
Topics
  • Topic System Analysis
  • System Analysis Methodology ...
  • System Analysis Techniques ...
  • ...
  • Topic System Design
  • Coding System
  • Database Normalization
  • ...
  • Topic Project Management
  • Project Definition and Planning
  • Leading the Project
  • ...
  • Topic Group Technologies
  • Group Work and Behaviour
  • Groupware
  • ...
  • Instructional dilemma
  • too big and context sensitive to be easily
    updated
  • but if context is removed, instruction less
    useful
  • in a dynamic environment hierarchical
    organization can become quite complicated
    (Gopher v. WWW)

16
Problems with classic hierarchy classification
  • They have rigid classification relationships
  • Unique not multiple search criteria
  • Need for multiple connections creates redundancy
  • Unstable in dynamic environments such as teaching
    team curricula design
  • Continuous adjustment is expensive
  • Matrix or Hypertext concept more flexible

17
Organizing Lessons
  • Learning Modules can be classified
  • Statically
  • always on topic criteria
  • time independent
  • Dynamically
  • on course criteria
  • time dependant

18
1. Define topic(s)Generic topics
19
2. Learning modulessmall and somewhat context
insensitive
20
3. Enhance context through choice and sequence
Static
Dynamic
Course 1
Course 2
Course 3
...
Classification by CoursesLINEAR-NO HIERARCHY
21
Small Modules Matrix Structure
  • Simple
  • Flexible
  • Low maintenance
  • Technology independent
  • Can be created dynamically, step-by-step
  • Can be created and used by more than one educator

22
Creating Courses
  • Can be designed and updated quickly
  • Complex but not too complicated for users
  • Could be highly automated
  • Easy to test

23
Learning Modulescould have two possible
structures
  • Small context free module
  • Another independent matrix structure

Financial Management
Marketing Management
Practical Use of PC
Market
...
...
Basic Terms
24
Build Modules Using Digitized Objects
  • Learning Module can be
  • text on paper
  • HTML text
  • MS Word document
  • PowerPoint presentation
  • Can contain digitized
  • multi-media objects
  • Picture .GIF, .JPG, .TIF...
  • Excel graphs
  • Audio Clip .WAV, Video Clip .RM, ...
  • Courses contain LM with instruction
  • LM contain digitized objects
  • for use the number of adopted standards must be
    small

25
System management
  • Need to organize teaching groups
  • Small set of materials, use "paper" database
  • very simple and effective
  • By computer database
  • simple to construct
  • large scale of possible technologies (RDBMSs,
    ODBMSs, HTMLJavaCGI, macro languages, )

26
In context of Soros DL Project
  • Tri-level structures create the possibility for
    immediate work on materials restructuring
  • Structures are simple to communicate
  • 1st level - unique materials and/or digitized
    objects and limited context
  • 2nd level- lessons with instruction and some
    context
  • 3rd level courses with rich context

27
Matrix structure for DEALER should be the main
principle in every segment of the
projectstandards development, database
development, materials restructuring,
communication, cooperation with other
institutions (GLEN), ...
28
LEMON RepositoryLearning Modules Network
Repository
Soros Foundations Open Society Fund Bosnia and
Herzegovina MIT Center Sarajevo
  • END
  • Zlatan Sabic
  • Sarajevo, July 1998
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com