Title: STABILIZING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM KEY ISSUES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IDEAs Conference
1STABILIZING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
SYSTEMKEY ISSUES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIESIDEAs
Conference on Re-regulating Finance in the Light
of the Global CrisisApril 9 2009, Beijing
2Issues/Objectives
- Preventing or reducing the likelihood of
financial crises with global ramifications - Minimizing negative international spillovers from
crisis response by governments - Improving international intervention and
resolution of crises in emerging markets.
3Three Sources of Instability
- Policies in systemically important countries,
including some larger emerging markets. - Problems inherent to an international reserves
system based on a national currency- the dollar. - Financial and currency markets.
4And Three Areas of Reform
- Effective multilateral discipline in
macroeconomic and exchange rate policies to
secure stable exchange rates and payments - Establishment of an international reserves system
not based on a national currency - Regulation and supervision of international
financial markets and capital flows.
5Prevention Multilateral Policy Discipline in
Money and Finance
- Asymmetry between trade and finance Adverse
global spillovers from macroeconomic, exchange
rate and financial policies are more damaging
than those from trade policies but not subject
to multilateral disciplines. - IMF members have same de jure obligations to
maintain orderly exchange rates and payments.
But Fund is unable to exert disciplines over its
non-borrowing members. How to remove this
asymmetry and make surveillance effective,
even-handed and independent of IMF lending? - In surveillance, the Fund should recognize that
stability depends as much on combating inflation
in asset markets (asset bubbles) as combating
inflation in product markets. But it fails to do
so (US and Iceland)
6PreventionA Stable International Reserves
System
- Inherent instability of a reserves system based
on a national currency, now aggravated by - Absence of effective multilateral discipline over
US policies - Liberalization vulnerability of DCs to shifts in
cap. flows - Pro-cyclical behaviour of financial markets
- Absence of an international lender of last resort
(ILOLR) - High reserve costs in DCs (some 130 billion per
annum). - Solutions
- Multiple reserves systems no more stable
- LOLR is neither feasible nor desirable
- An SDRs based system
7PreventionAn SDRs-Based Reserve System?
- Holding SDRs entails no cost cost incurred only
when used. There are proposals for regular
allocation to all or only to poor members. - Going further and funding IMF by SDRs, not by
quotas, GAB or NAB. IMF could distribute SDRs to
itself at regular intervals, linked to growth in
world income or trade guaranteed by its
shareholders (like WB). - Allow banks to hold SDRs. Make it possible to
use SDRs for currency interventions. - Greater automaticity in access widen reserve
tranche on the basis of need (not quota
subscriptions) should be designed for
countercyclical CA financing.
8Prevention Regulation of Financial Markets and
Capital Flows
- Why regulations should be international
- Since financial instability has adverse global
spillovers, national regulatory practices should
be subject to multilateral disciplines - This would also reduce the influence of
politicians on regulators - And prevent regulatory arbitrage whereby business
could run away from tightly to lightly regulated
jurisdictions - Options
- A fully fledged multilateral system built on the
same principle as the WTO - A selective approach regulate certain areas
through multilateral bodies - An eclectic approach extended current system
based on voluntary cooperation - Selective-eclectic mix G20 approach?
9Prevention Regulation of Financial Markets and
Capital Flows
- A fully fledged system (WFA) based on
- Binding multilateral agreements on regulations
- Commitment by governments to implement through
national regulators - A multilateral institution to oversee
implementation and impose sanctions for
non-compliance. - Hurdles likely to be faced
- Difficulties in agreeing how best to regulate
financial institutions and markets - Major ICs unwilling to give up autonomy,
particularly if such an institution is to have a
real clout- even EU cannot do it. - Risks for developing countries
- Governance problems
- Problem of one-size-fits-all. SD Treatment does
not work - Concession on free capital movements and market
access in financial services
10Prevention Regulation of Financial Markets and
Capital Flows
- A selective approach
- Establish international supervisory bodies for
large transnational banks and credit rating
agencies on the basis of agreed standard and
rules. - Favoured by France
- Such a step would involve complex issues of
sovereignty and power of international bodies
vis-à-vis national regulators. - An eclectic approach
- Extend the mandate and improve the governance of
existing bodies such as FSF, BIS, Basle Committee
on Banking Supervision. - Need to keep the IMF out of it.
- Favoured by the US. Likely to be combined with
global regulation and supervision of rating
agencies and some big banks
11Prevention Regulation of Financial Markets and
Capital Flows
- DCs are not ready to negotiate need common
reflection and an agenda to maintain autonomy but
reduce vulnerability. Key areas - 1. Reduce pro-cyclical behaviour of international
lenders to DCs - 2. Regulate investors in DCs (institutional
investors, hedge funds) - Improve transparency through reporting and
disclosure requirements - Restrict their investment strategies to reduce
destabilizing effects on EMs - 3. Rating agencies regulate them
- To eliminate procyclical rating and bias against
DCs borrowers/issuers - To improve ratings of securities held by CBs and
private investors in DCs - Recognition of rights to impose control over both
inflows and outflows - 5. A statutory framework for temporary debt
standstills. - 6. Arbitration for sovereign debt of DCs to
private and official creditors.
12Crisis Response National
- Prevent adverse global spillovers from crisis
response by governments- e.g. import restrictions
and subsidies in US (WTO) - Prevent beggar-my-neighbour exchange rate
policies (IMF). - Prevent free riding and promote coordination of
macro-economic policy response to crises (IMF)
13Crisis Intervention and Resolution International
- IMF interventions bailing-out creditors and
investors, keeping debtors current on debt
payments, maintaining open capital account
promoting pro-cyclical policies. - Problematic because of moral hazard,
burden-sharing and impact on poverty. But
initiatives for reform came to nothing, including
new mechanisms to bail-in the private lenders and
investors, and terms and conditions of IMF
lending. - Now IMF is back to business and it looks business
as usual. - Modalities of IMF interventions the first issue
to be taken up. This should be part of a general
reform of IMF including its funding, operating
procedures and governance (see YA paper for the
G-24). - Now urgent need for a large, highly concessional
global countercyclical facility (like two oil
facilities in the 1970s) to be funded by a
reversible SDRs allocation, larger than agreed by
G20.