STABILIZING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM KEY ISSUES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IDEAs Conference PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 13
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STABILIZING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM KEY ISSUES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IDEAs Conference


1
STABILIZING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
SYSTEMKEY ISSUES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIESIDEAs
Conference on Re-regulating Finance in the Light
of the Global CrisisApril 9 2009, Beijing
  • Yilmaz Akyüz

2
Issues/Objectives
  • Preventing or reducing the likelihood of
    financial crises with global ramifications
  • Minimizing negative international spillovers from
    crisis response by governments
  • Improving international intervention and
    resolution of crises in emerging markets.

3
Three Sources of Instability
  • Policies in systemically important countries,
    including some larger emerging markets.
  • Problems inherent to an international reserves
    system based on a national currency- the dollar.
  • Financial and currency markets.

4
And Three Areas of Reform
  • Effective multilateral discipline in
    macroeconomic and exchange rate policies to
    secure stable exchange rates and payments
  • Establishment of an international reserves system
    not based on a national currency
  • Regulation and supervision of international
    financial markets and capital flows.

5
Prevention Multilateral Policy Discipline in
Money and Finance
  • Asymmetry between trade and finance Adverse
    global spillovers from macroeconomic, exchange
    rate and financial policies are more damaging
    than those from trade policies but not subject
    to multilateral disciplines.
  • IMF members have same de jure obligations to
    maintain orderly exchange rates and payments.
    But Fund is unable to exert disciplines over its
    non-borrowing members. How to remove this
    asymmetry and make surveillance effective,
    even-handed and independent of IMF lending?
  • In surveillance, the Fund should recognize that
    stability depends as much on combating inflation
    in asset markets (asset bubbles) as combating
    inflation in product markets. But it fails to do
    so (US and Iceland)

6
PreventionA Stable International Reserves
System
  • Inherent instability of a reserves system based
    on a national currency, now aggravated by
  • Absence of effective multilateral discipline over
    US policies
  • Liberalization vulnerability of DCs to shifts in
    cap. flows
  • Pro-cyclical behaviour of financial markets
  • Absence of an international lender of last resort
    (ILOLR)
  • High reserve costs in DCs (some 130 billion per
    annum).
  • Solutions
  • Multiple reserves systems no more stable
  • LOLR is neither feasible nor desirable
  • An SDRs based system

7
PreventionAn SDRs-Based Reserve System?
  • Holding SDRs entails no cost cost incurred only
    when used. There are proposals for regular
    allocation to all or only to poor members.
  • Going further and funding IMF by SDRs, not by
    quotas, GAB or NAB. IMF could distribute SDRs to
    itself at regular intervals, linked to growth in
    world income or trade guaranteed by its
    shareholders (like WB).
  • Allow banks to hold SDRs. Make it possible to
    use SDRs for currency interventions.
  • Greater automaticity in access widen reserve
    tranche on the basis of need (not quota
    subscriptions) should be designed for
    countercyclical CA financing.

8
Prevention Regulation of Financial Markets and
Capital Flows
  • Why regulations should be international
  • Since financial instability has adverse global
    spillovers, national regulatory practices should
    be subject to multilateral disciplines
  • This would also reduce the influence of
    politicians on regulators
  • And prevent regulatory arbitrage whereby business
    could run away from tightly to lightly regulated
    jurisdictions
  • Options
  • A fully fledged multilateral system built on the
    same principle as the WTO
  • A selective approach regulate certain areas
    through multilateral bodies
  • An eclectic approach extended current system
    based on voluntary cooperation
  • Selective-eclectic mix G20 approach?

9
Prevention Regulation of Financial Markets and
Capital Flows
  • A fully fledged system (WFA) based on
  • Binding multilateral agreements on regulations
  • Commitment by governments to implement through
    national regulators
  • A multilateral institution to oversee
    implementation and impose sanctions for
    non-compliance.
  • Hurdles likely to be faced
  • Difficulties in agreeing how best to regulate
    financial institutions and markets
  • Major ICs unwilling to give up autonomy,
    particularly if such an institution is to have a
    real clout- even EU cannot do it.
  • Risks for developing countries
  • Governance problems
  • Problem of one-size-fits-all. SD Treatment does
    not work
  • Concession on free capital movements and market
    access in financial services

10
Prevention Regulation of Financial Markets and
Capital Flows
  • A selective approach
  • Establish international supervisory bodies for
    large transnational banks and credit rating
    agencies on the basis of agreed standard and
    rules.
  • Favoured by France
  • Such a step would involve complex issues of
    sovereignty and power of international bodies
    vis-à-vis national regulators.
  • An eclectic approach
  • Extend the mandate and improve the governance of
    existing bodies such as FSF, BIS, Basle Committee
    on Banking Supervision.
  • Need to keep the IMF out of it.
  • Favoured by the US. Likely to be combined with
    global regulation and supervision of rating
    agencies and some big banks

11
Prevention Regulation of Financial Markets and
Capital Flows
  • DCs are not ready to negotiate need common
    reflection and an agenda to maintain autonomy but
    reduce vulnerability. Key areas
  • 1. Reduce pro-cyclical behaviour of international
    lenders to DCs
  • 2. Regulate investors in DCs (institutional
    investors, hedge funds)
  • Improve transparency through reporting and
    disclosure requirements
  • Restrict their investment strategies to reduce
    destabilizing effects on EMs
  • 3. Rating agencies regulate them
  • To eliminate procyclical rating and bias against
    DCs borrowers/issuers
  • To improve ratings of securities held by CBs and
    private investors in DCs
  • Recognition of rights to impose control over both
    inflows and outflows
  • 5. A statutory framework for temporary debt
    standstills.
  • 6. Arbitration for sovereign debt of DCs to
    private and official creditors.

12
Crisis Response National
  • Prevent adverse global spillovers from crisis
    response by governments- e.g. import restrictions
    and subsidies in US (WTO)
  • Prevent beggar-my-neighbour exchange rate
    policies (IMF).
  • Prevent free riding and promote coordination of
    macro-economic policy response to crises (IMF)

13
Crisis Intervention and Resolution International
  • IMF interventions bailing-out creditors and
    investors, keeping debtors current on debt
    payments, maintaining open capital account
    promoting pro-cyclical policies.
  • Problematic because of moral hazard,
    burden-sharing and impact on poverty. But
    initiatives for reform came to nothing, including
    new mechanisms to bail-in the private lenders and
    investors, and terms and conditions of IMF
    lending.
  • Now IMF is back to business and it looks business
    as usual.
  • Modalities of IMF interventions the first issue
    to be taken up. This should be part of a general
    reform of IMF including its funding, operating
    procedures and governance (see YA paper for the
    G-24).
  • Now urgent need for a large, highly concessional
    global countercyclical facility (like two oil
    facilities in the 1970s) to be funded by a
    reversible SDRs allocation, larger than agreed by
    G20.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com