BLA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

BLA

Description:

(IWF A/Follicular/Transformed) 1o efficacy endpoint: superior ORR ... Limited data in IWF A and transformed subjects preclude definitive conclusions. Safety ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: Bish46
Category:
Tags: bla | iwf

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BLA


1
BLA 125019ZEVALIN Kit
  • Philippe Bishop, MD FDA/CBER
  • September 11, 2001

2
Presentation Outline
  • Regulatory History
  • Study Results
  • Efficacy
  • Safety
  • Dosimetry Biodistribution
  • Summary
  • Committee Questions

3
BLA 125019 Regulatory History
4
ZEVALIN BLA Contents
  • Results of 5 clinical studies were submitted in
    support of the proposed biologic license
    application

5
Proposed Indication
  • Treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory
    low-grade, follicular or CD20 transformed B-cell
    NHL, and for the treatment of patients with
    RITUXAN-refractory follicular NHL.

6
Regulatory History
Date
IND Submission
11-24-92
106-03
6-13-96
106-04
2-24-98
106-05
5-20-98
106-06
7-7-98
106-98
12-9-99
7
Regulatory History
8
Efficacy
9
ZEVALIN Therapy Development
  • 1 major controlled efficacy study
  • AND
  • 1 supportive trial in the refractory setting

10
Efficacy StudyTrial 106-04
  • Active control rituximab
  • Stratification by histology
  • (IWF A/Follicular/Transformed)
  • 1o efficacy endpoint superior ORR (LEXCOR)

11
106-04 Primary Efficacy Analysis
Protocol Defined Response Criteria/LEXCOR
Evaluation Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
stratified by histology type
12
106-04 Subgroup AnalysisORR
13
106-04 Duration of Response (DR)
K-M estimated medians (months)
14
106-04 Subgroup AnalysisDuration of Response
15
Supportive StudyTrial 106-06
  • Non-randomized trial in rituximab-refractory
    follicular B-cell NHL
  • 1o efficacy endpoint ORR (LEXCOR)

16
Trial 106-06
  • In this patient population an ORR 35 and a DR
    comparable to prior rituximab was considered
    acceptable evidence of activity

17
106-06 Primary Efficacy Analysis
Protocol Defined Response Criteria/LEXCOR
Evaluation
18
106-06 Duration of Response
Protocol defined analysis K-M estimated
medians (months)
19
ZEVALIN vs. Prior Rituximab Therapy Analysis
  • DR for ZEVALIN therapy compared to the prior
    rituximab therapy
  • Each subject used as their own control
  • Favors ZEVALIN if duration of response to
    ZEVALIN is at least 1 month longer
  • Favors rituximab if duration of response to
    rituximab is at least 1 month longer

20
106-06Duration of Response
DR for ZEVALIN therapy compared to the prior
rituximab therapy Each subject used as their own
control

N
54
29
Favors ZEVALIN
9
5
Favors Rituximab
37
20
Neither
21
EfficacyFDA Assessment
  • ZEVALIN therapy has demonstrable and durable
    anti-tumor activity (ORR) in follicular subjects.
  • Limited data in IWF A and transformed subjects
    preclude definitive conclusions.

22
Safety
23
Hematologic ToxicityWithin First 90 Days (N392)
24
Grade 3-4 ANCN214/392 (55)
25
Immunologic Effects
  • All subjects had B-cell depletion
  • Median time to baseline recovery 6 months
  • Transient IgM decline
  • IgG and IgA remained normal

26
Infections
114/358 (32) had a total of 183 events 28/358
(8) had Grade 3-4 events
27
Grade 3-4 PLTN224/392 (57)
28
Study 106-05 Grades 3-4 PLTN26/30 (87)
29
Incidence of Bleeding
  • 62 (18) subjects had at least 1 bleeding event
  • 7 subjects had a total of 12 Grade 3-5 events
  • 2 intracranial bleed ? Death
  • 1 vaginal bleed
  • 1 ecchymosis
  • 4 GI bleed
  • 1 hematemesis
  • 3 melena

5 subjects
30
Exploratory Analyses Cytopenias Risk Factors
  • Baseline BM involvement
  • Number of prior regimens
  • Prior fludarabine therapy
  • Baseline platelet level

31
Non Cytopenic AEsPer Patient Incidence (N358)
32
Common Non-Heme AEsStudy 106-04
33
Notable AEs (All Grades)Study 106-04
34
Secondary Malignanciesn349
  • 3 AML
  • 2 MDS
  • 1 meningioma
  • Onset 8 to 34 months post ZEVALIN therapy and 4
    to 13 years following NHL diagnosis

35
HAMA/HACA Response(N211)
  • 5 subjects had positive HAMA titers
  • 2 had positive baseline HAMA titers
  • 3 developed titers post-treatment
  • 3 subjects had positive HACA titers
  • 2 had positive baseline HACA titers
  • 1 developed titers post-treatment

36
Deaths
  • 70 of 349 (20) subjects died
  • 58 ? PD
  • 12 ? other causes
  • 2 intracranial hemorrhage
  • 5 MDS/AML
  • 3 pulmonary complications
  • 1 cardiac arrest
  • 1 pneumonia

37
Safety FDA Assessment
  • ZEVALIN therapy is characterized by a high
    incidence of cytopenias
  • Gr. 3-4 ANC 55
  • Gr. 3-4 PLT 57
  • median duration 3-4 weeks

38
Safety FDA Assessment
  • Most serious AEs included
  • Hemorrhage ? 2 deaths
  • Myeloid malig. ? 5 deaths
  • Infections
  • Allergic reactions

39
Dosimetry Biodistribution
40
Whole Body Biodistribution Imaging
  • 179 subjects assessed
  • Five imaging time points
  • Diagnostic quality imaging for multiple organs
  • Diagnostic quality imaging for known tumor sites

41
Normal Organ Dosimetry
  • MIRDOSE 3.1 Software
  • Regions of Interest for Multiple Organs with
    Localization of Radiolabeled Antibody
  • Heart, Lung, Liver, Small Intestine, Spleen,
    Testes, Kidneys, Bone Marrow (Sacrum)

42
Radiation Absorbed DoseNotable Organs
Range
Median dose (cGy) for 32 mCi
Organ
781-2368
1350
Spleen
70-106
90
Red marrow (Sacral ROI)
349-880
547
Liver
38-1184
950
Testes
122-288
211
Upper large bowel
256-467
368
Lower large bowel
43
GI Toxicity (All Grades)
44
Worst Case Scenarios
  • Adjacent normal tissues
  • Alteration in the biodistribution
  • Obstruction of clearance route - renal obstruction

45
Dosimetry-BiodistributionFDA Assessment
  • Normal organ dosimetry supports the use of
    fixed-dose of 90Y-labeled ZEVALIN.
  • Biodistribution is necessary for assessment of
    normal organ and tumor site localization

46
Dosimetry-BiodistributionFDA Assessment
  • There are inadequate data to assess the safety of
    additive localized radiation effects from
    external beam radiation therapy and ZEVALIN
    therapy.

47
Conclusions
48
Summary
  • Durable anti-tumor activity (ORR) was documented
    in both efficacy studies
  • ZEVALIN therapy is associated with significant
    hematologic toxicity in a majority of subjects
    and serious morbidity in a minority of subjects.

49
Summary
  • As compared to RITUXAN, ZEVALIN was associated
    with superior ORR, similar DR and TTP.
  • ZEVALIN showed 58 ORR in RITUXAN refractory
    subjects.

50
Summary
  • Data are limited in non-follicular subgroups.
  • Data in these subgroups is limited to subjects
    who have not received prior RITUXAN.

51
Questions to the Committee
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com