Title: International Accounting Standards The Big Picture Chris Lewis
1(No Transcript)
2International Accounting StandardsThe Big
PictureChris Lewis Greg Martin
3Plenary Overview
- The Stable Platform - widget makers to banks Greg
- The Not So Stable Bits an update Greg
- The Regulators View APRA ASIC Chris
- Actuaries Industry what are they doing? Chris
4The Stable Platform
- IAS apply from 1/1/05
- Affects all reporting entities
- From widget makers to banks, public sector
- IAS implemented in Australia via AASB
equivalent standards. IASB conceptual framework
adopted. - New AASB all published 15 July 2004
- Based on IAS as at 31 March 2004
- Disclosure of general impact of IAS on future
results from 30 June 2004 for listed entities
5Widget Makers Changes/Impacts
- Debt / equity definition changes
reclassifications - e.g. preference shares
- Net asset impacts. Capital funding and securities
structures - Business combinations, Goodwill, Joint Ventures
- Combinations various technical (but
significant) changes - Goodwill Non-amortisation. Reduced MA issues
- Intangibles and masthead values
- Signification net asset impacts
- Tax issues to be clarified (?)
- Extractive industries outstanding issues
6Widget Makers Changes/Impacts
- IAS19 DB super funds onto the balance sheet
- Volatility (see more later)
- Share based payments (employee share options)
- Valuation. Disclosure.
- Increased expense
- Financial Instruments
- Non-derivative mostly on balance sheet at fair
value - Embedded Derivatives fair value PL and balance
sheet - Hedge accounting (commodities especially)
- Volatility and mismatch issues
7Widget Makers Changes/Impacts
- Other common items
- Tax PL ? balance sheet. certain ? probable.
- Revaluation of non-current assets
- Investment property. Foreign currency translation
reserves. - Others such as leases devil in detail
- Presentation changes OEI, OCI, recycling
- True and fair view over-ride
- Opening position as if IFRS always applied
- Need to back fit few transitional outs
- Disclosure
8Banks Changes/Impacts
- As per widget makers generally, PLUS
- Recognition/De-recognition - Securitisation
- Some off balance sheet arrangements back on
- Impaired assets and general provisions
- Asset specific provisions only no general
provisions - Discounted values, not undiscounted test
- Increased work
- EMVONA (life subs) out
- But non-amortised goodwill in
- Reduced volatility
- Embedded derivatives at market value disclosure
9Banks Changes/Impacts
- Hedge accounting
- Regulatory issues (see later) - capital,
securitisation - Potential increased volatility
- Hedge accounting
- Embedded derivatives at market value
- Financial instruments AFS balance sheet
volatility - Impaired assets no general / dynamic
smoothing - Increased disclosure
10Life Insurers Big Picture
- 1038 now only insurance contracts ( Par)
- Investment contracts under AASB139 and AASB118
- Unit linked, investment account, term certain
annuities - Assets under other standards - AASB139, AASB140,
AASB116. Also AASB127, AASB128, AASB131. - Fair valuing subsidiaries gone almost!
- Tax under AASB112 (IAS12) no discounting
11Life Insurers Changes/Impacts
- Insurance liabilities ( Par)
- Mostly unchanged
- Discount rate change for non-asset linked
liabilities - But see later
- Reinsurance no inception profits, separate
treatment - Extra work
- Investment contracts
- Various changes but mostly DAC
- Substantially reduced DAC amount (see further
later) - Pattern of DAC amortisation. DAC on balance
sheet. - Recycling profits on in-force
- Net profit effect depends on future volume via
life ? FM
12Life Insurers Changes/Impacts
- A number of asset related issues
- Assets backing policy liabilities stay at fair
value (generally) - But not all have fair value option, or some only
via equity - Realisation costs gone
- Resulting unit pricing and asset linked liability
issues - Base policy benefits on new accounting???
- No discounting tax
- Non-FV asset treatments
- Equity???
- Accounting assets not align with realisation
values / prices - Accounting treatment if dont change benefit
basis? - Valuation liabilities?
13Life Insurers Changes/Impacts
- Treatment of subs and associate assets still
unclear - Different Parent and Consolidated treatment
- Where back policy liabilities, different policy
liabilities? - Other assets retain options AFS
- Profit management opportunities?
- Volatility/mismatch impacts
- Regulatory issues - see later
- Disclosure
- Friendly Societies see later
14General Insurers - Changes
- 1023 also now only insurance contracts
- Liabilities now include a risk margin
- Unearned premium DAC, subject to adequacy test
- Discount rate clarified
- Asset values per life insurers
- Reinsurance / reinsurers
- Inception profit restriction
- Estimates and forward allowances
- Other changes per widget makers, banks, life
- Debt/Equity, Super DB Funds, etc
15General Insurers Impacts Issues
- Outstanding claims some up, some down
- APRA 75 not required, but has to be disclosed
- Discount rates some increase in liabilities
- Premium (minus DAC) Liabilities
- Loss recognition / adequacy testing by LOB
- If based on 75 sufficiency hard / conservative
test? - Profit deferral - Drag on growing insurers
- Reinsurance / Reinsurers
- Some asset issues (mismatch for non-FV assets)
- Disclosure extra work
16Funds Managers
- Managers themselves
- Impacts largely as per widget makers generally
- Some potential secondary impact on fees via
secondary impacts on unit funds impacts (see
below) - Clarification of availability of DAC per life
- But incremental only as per life
- Profit bring forward for growing manager
- Life / FM groups.
- Unit Funds
- Limited direct impact IASB not directed here
- Secondary impacts via potential asset value
impacts
17Super Funds
- Funds themselves
- Limited direct impact IASB not directed here
- Secondary impacts via potential asset value
impacts - DB Funds Employer accounts
- AASB19 Net assets to employer accounts (on PUC)
- Australia has not allowed corridor under IAS19
- Full volatility
- AASB Australia has no deep corporate debt
market - Value liabilities at CTB rate! Maybe revised
(IFRIC). - Volatility ? Investment strategies, future of DB
- Actuaries having to explain IAS19 v funding
- IAS19TF Workshop to discuss / find out more
18The Not So Stable Bits
- Life Discount rates
- Life GI Assets backing insurance liabilities
- Also Phase II eventually
- Investment Contracts Acquisition expenses DAC
- IAS39 ED132 - Fair Value Limitation
- IAS19 / AASB119 The third option
- Also Phase II eventually
19Life (AASB1038) Discount rates
- Final 1038 changed discount rates
- 8.7 life insurance liabilities shall be
discounted for the time value of money using
risk-free discount rates based on current
observable, objective rates that relate to the
nature, structure and term of the future
obligations. - 8.8.2 In applying paragraph 8.7, typically,
government bond rates may be appropriate discount
rates for the purposes of this Standard, or they
may be an appropriate starting point . - Not sure where this is going to end up.
Annuities, YRT. - Look to get something sensible via AS1.04.
- Get LIASB/AASB to agree 1038 As1.04 mean same
thing. - Significant risk of annuity discount rates
inconsistent with IAS39
20Assets backing insurance liabilities
- 1023 and 1038 Assets that back insurance and
investment contract liabilities to be measured at
fair value through profit or loss. - No specification of what this means
- The final version of 1038 was amended to remove
the direction that this means statutory fund. - Note APRA/LIASB decisions and asset tagging
issues.
21Investment ContractsAcquisition expenses DAC
- GN550 Now out as a formal discussion draft.
- What are deferrable acquisition costs
(incremental transaction costs) is probably main
issue to resolve - International interpretation trending towards
tier 1. - That is, variable expenses only.
- But pattern of amortisation also important
- IAS39TF Workshop to discuss / find out more
22ED132 - Fair Value Limitation
- IAAust AASB opposed ED132
- So did vast majority of respondents to IASB.
- No response from IASB yet
- Looking like Europe will adopt a modified IAS39
- Will not adopt IAS39 either as it is or with FV
limitation - If FV limit does come in, not likely now until
2006 - Clarification on any of this not likely before Q4
2004
23IAS19 / AASB119 The third option
- ED131 proposes a third option (second for
Aus) - Current two options
- All changes in net assets of DB fund to profit
- Deferred recognition if inside /- 10 corridor
- Australia only allows first of these (full
recognition) - New option being considered
- Expected expense to profit or loss
- Actuarial gains / losses to equity
- Issues include how gains / losses get out of
equity? - If comes in, will not be until 2006 (but early
adoption)
24APRA
The Preliminary View from the Regulator Chris
Lewis
25General Principles
- IFRS doesnt fundamentally alter underlying
business - Capital requirement levels shouldnt normally
change just because accounting does - However, mechanics may well change where items
recorded in accounts are used in capital
calculations - Changes may highlight some areas where capital
requirements would benefit from revision
26APRAs Approach
- APRA will release a series of discussion papers
over next few months, and consult - APRAs approach is aiming to minimise disruption,
but NOT minimise importance of industry being
ready for this change - Will identify potential changes to prudential
rules and statistical requirements, categorised
into four groups
27APRAs Approach (contd)
- Changes in 2005 (from 1 July or later)
- Changes expected in 2005, but harmonised with
approaches of overseas regulators - Possible changes after 2005, after monitoring
prudential impact of IFRS - Areas where no change expected
28Initial Picture
- No changes to standards before 1 July 2005
- With a few exceptions, retain existing accounting
treatment, and hence existing prudential
outcomes. - Consider other international approaches and
monitor experience before any further changes. - May entail some dual reporting
29Bank Capital Issues
- Debt v Equity Classification Tier 1 Capital
- EMVONA
- Securitisation
- Super Fund Surpluses and Deficits
- Hedge Transactions
- General Provisions (change from expected basis
to incurred basis)
30Debt v Equity Classification
- If treated as debt then may no longer eligible
for Tier 1 Capital - IFRS approach more stringent (and may be
justified). - Wait to see stance taken by Basel.
31EMVONA Tier 1, 2
- Value of In Force Business in a life office
subsidiary where the life office is in turn owned
by a bank. - May be removed from retained earnings and so
should be a deduction from Tier 1 Capital,
whereas currently deducted from Total Capital. - Need for transitional arrangements
32Securitisation
- If brought back on balance sheet then (under
current rules) would generate additional capital
requirements. - Affects many smaller banks and building
societies. - Reinstate existing rules for prudential purposes,
then wait and see. - APRA intends to review securitisation more
broadly leading into Basel II
33Superannuation Fund Surpluses
- Applies more broadly than just banks
- APRA intends to review its prudential approach to
treatment of surpluses and deficits
34Other Comments.
- If changes affect retained earnings then affect
Tier 1 Capital. - In most cases, retain existing accounting
treatment for prudential purposes. - Wait and see.
- Recognise that this may impose some element of
dual reporting
35Life Insurers
- Strategy broadly the same minimise disruption.
- Working with the LIASB.
- Possible issue around dual reporting in the short
term.
36Major Changes
- Treatment of Investment Contracts
- Treatment of Deferred Acquisition Costs
- Measurement of Assets
- Treatment of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
with no discounting - Owner occupied property
- Disclosures
- Others (as for banking)
37Investment Contracts
- May require a new standard.
- Build on GN550
- Financial instrument component at fair value
- DAC amortisation comparable to AS1.03, but may
require some constraints to satisfy traditional
accounting view of DAC (? AERC)
38AS1.03
- Changes to discount rate
- Loss recognition to include any intangible assets
arising on acquisition - Align asymmetry treatment with treatment of
embedded derivatives - Reinsurance treatment and disclosure
- Changes to expense allocations to accommodate
investment contracts.
39AS2.03, AS3.03
- Market Value v Fair Value
- Assets that are not fair valued
- Changes to discount rate
- Deal with DAC asset on investment contracts
(unless offset against liability under PR 35) - Undiscounted deferred tax
- Inadmissibility rules to align with EMVONA
treatment - Any other changes on LIASB agenda (?AS6.02?)
40Friendly Societies
- Currently exempt from AASB1038/MoS (ASIC class
order) and have own policy liability standard
ASFS1.02 - Still have to comply with AS2.03,AS3.03, and
AS6.02 - ASIC class order expires during 2005, unlikely to
be extended - Would then need to comply with AASB1038 - MoS for
insurance contracts (until Phase II) and new
rules for investment contracts - ASF1.02 will need amendment whatever outcome
41General Insurers
- Changes are more minor (most business is
insurance) - Most impacts in respect of disclosures
- Note 2001 legislation and standards divorced
prudential accounting from AASB1023 - Industry also subject to changes arising from
Stage II of the GI Regulatory Reforms
42Impact on Liability Valuations
- Minor changes to liability valuation
- Generally move accounting standards more towards
prudential standards (e.g. discount rates,
liability adequacy testing, risk margins) - But still some potential for dual reporting (e.g.
unearned premiums) - Significant new disclosures (e.g. sensitivity
analyses, claim developments, risk
concentrations)
43Capital Impacts
- Changes to measurement of assets will need to be
accommodated (same as for life insurance) - Changes to definitions of Tier 1 and Tier 2
capital (same as for banks).
44An issue causing difficulty asset measurement
- Most standards currently uses market value
essentially mid price less transaction costs - Fair value (where available) requires bid price
with no realisation costs - Results are often very similar, but not same
- Need to balance desire to maintain the status quo
against dual reporting impacts - Note change may also be an issue in unit pricing
- Potential for different treatment between parent
entity and consolidated accounts
45Funds Managers
- These arent APRAs domain.
- However, there may conceivably be some impact on
rules governing the determination of net assets /
liquid assets.
46Superannuation (DB's)
- There are no significant prudential issues
expected for funds themselves. - Main impact is on the sponsors accounts.
47Actuaries Industry - What Are We Doing
- Internationally
- By the Institute
- By the Regulator
48International Actuarial Association
- Developing guidance notes to support IFRS
- Most at the educative level, although a few will
in time constitute recommended practice - Expected to be released shortly for 4 month
exposure period - IAAust has various task forces which will provide
feedback and assess impact on IAAust standards
and GNs - IAAust should aim to be consistent, although ours
should have higher standing
49IAAust
- IAS19TF - IAS19 guidance
- IAS39TF Drafted GN550 considering a note on
deferability of expenses - Attempting to balance desire for minimal change
against ideal of consistent treatment for life
and non-life investment contracts - Support actuarial role in the non-life space.
- AS1.03 Task Force to provide advice to LIASB
/ APRA on changes required / proposed for
existing standards - Phase II will need to contribute to IAA as this
develops
50Industry
- How is everyone doing?
- Results of APRA survey ADIs, GIs, Llife
Insurers and Friendly Societies.
51State of Readiness as at 31 March
- Less than half assessed as prepared, although 95
confident they can manage. Smaller credit unions
and friendly societies have the most to do. - Operational risk of more concern than prudential
soundness - 86 of entities managing transition in-house.
- 75 of these have average, or less, IFRS
knowledge - Smaller entities relying on auditors.
- Conversion to cost 80m (at least).
- Around 30 were yet to communicate impacts to
Board. - Negative financial impact greatest for life
insurers