Title: Traditional 3PL versus eLogistics Companies The Wall Street View
1(No Transcript)
2Traditional 3PL versus e-Logistics CompaniesThe
Wall Street View
Laurie Hahn, CFA Deutsche Bank Securities,
Inc. Airfreight Surface Transportation Team
November, 2002
3E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- During the late 1990s, the e-logistics industry
was born and roared onto the competitive
landscape. - In little less than 12 months, over 100
e-logistics companies appeared.
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- New participants were well-funded
- Venture capitalists were constantly looking for
new technology driven investment opportunities. - Provided start-up/seed funding enabling
first-to-market. - IPO/Investment banking provided access to capital
markets and an even larger pool of funding.
10E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- Transportation/Logistics industry was a logical
choice for investment. - Information was becoming increasingly important,
necessitating the need for improved technology. - For many shippers, transportation function was
last frontier of rationalization, technology
appeared to be the answer to lower costs and
improved productivity and efficiency.
11E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- E-logistics firms had goals
- creation of value by eliminating the middleman
(i.e. the 3PL) - creation of value by commoditizing the services
of traditional transportation providers - Truckload Carriers
- Less-than-Truckload Carriers
- Airfreight Providers
- Ocean Freight Providers
12E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- In our opinion
- More HYPE than Reality!!!
- We viewed the e-Logistics participants as little
more than a minor annoyance for the traditional
3PLs.
13E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- Market size was ample for new entrants without
disrupting the growth prospects of the
traditional 3PL. - Only 15 penetration into shippers
transportation operations. - Only 7 penetration into shippers distribution
operations. - Growth of transportation/logistics/SCM
outsourcing fueled 20 annual industry growth for
better than 10 years.
14E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- Shippers facing increased pressure to
- OUTSOURCE
- non-core corporate functions.
15E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- Increasing complexity of supply chain due to
- globalization
- inventory practices
- Just-In-Time
- Just-In-Case
- search for productivity and efficiency
- increasing need for continual information flow
- Glass Pipeline - the Holy Grail of SCM
16E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- More appropriate uses of managerial, intellectual
and financial resources - Research Development on core product offering
- Organic Growth
- External expansion via market share gains or
acquisition/merger - Improved financial performance via earnings
growth and increased returns on invested capital - Creating additional shareholder value.
17E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- As the complexity associated with the outsourced
tasks increased, the need for - Experience and Value-Added Ideas
- increased in importance.
-
- Created growth opportunities for the mature
participants.
18E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- Funding for new entrants was at the whim of
outside parties -
- so many ideas floating around, investors had
options. - Technology diminished the importance of the 3PLs
transactional business - However, transactional business generated
predictable stream of revenue/cash flow from core
operations. - Cash flow was more than adequate to fund growth
expansion, as well as necessary technology
investment.
19E-Logistics The Emergence of a New Threat
- For the e-logistics providers, technology
overwhelmed the concept. - Internet was the overriding driver of the
business. - First-to-market hits became mantra for these
businesses. - 3PLs had substantial headstart (i.e. true
first-to-market) in terms of technology. - Movement of freight and SCM drove the business.
- Technology seen as a tool to facilitate the core
operations.
20The Threat is Quieted
- Two primary issues interrupted the growth
potential of the e-logistics industry
21The Threat is Quieted
- NASDAQ/Internet Bubble Burst
- Profitability once again became important
- Viability of technology driven business models
questioned - Valuations became increasingly inflated scaring
off would be investors - VC funding dried up
- Equity markets currently unavailable to many of
these businesses, further limiting availability
of much needed funding
22The Threat is Quieted
- Traditional 3PLs responded to the threat
- Saw the Internet as a tool to create
efficiencies, lower costs, and provide better
information (real-time) - Utilized sizable presence in the logistics arena
to fund technology enhancements - Took best practices and technologies from the
e-logistics companies and applied them to their
own business models.
23The Threat is Quieted
- Quickly became apparent that services offered by
e-logistics companies were rudimentary, comprised
of procedures that could be easily automated
- Load-matching
- Rating Systems for shippers carriers
- Tools for Selection Criteria (ex. Price)
- Online Freight Bidding
- Online connection between shippers and carriers
- Online routing and mapping
- Online tracking and tracing
- Data warehousing
- Fleet utilization software
- Purchasing Co-Ops
24The Threat is Quieted
- However, logistics and SCM is more than a
sequence of automated processes. - Traditional 3PLs created additional VALUE-ADDED
services
- Carrier selection
- Rate negotiation
- Transportation
- Warehouse management
- Shipment consolidation
- Freight forwarding
- Inventory management
- Product assembly
- Product returns
- Order processing
- Order fulfillment
- Information services
25The Threat is Quieted
- Companies emerged offering software
technologies performing same functions as the
e-logistics companies allowed traditional 3PLs
to automate certain functions and services as a
complement to their traditional and value-added
services. - i2 Technologies
- Descartes
- Manhattan Associates
- EXE
26The Battle Goes On
- While failure and consolidation has eaten into
the e-logistics ranks, the stronger players
remain. - Examples
- Transplace.com
- Transportation.com
- DAT Services
- Logistics.com
- Viable Business Model
- View technology as a tool and not the end all
solution - Many supported by stronger parent company
27The Threat is Quieted
- However, we believe the 3PLs now have the upper
hand - used sizable industry presence to capture
additional market share as outsourcing trend
continues - no funding issues, core operations provide
necessary cash flow - recent events increase complexity of logistics
tasks, further necessitating need for experience
and value creation
28Impact of Recent Events
- Attacks of September 11th resulted in substantial
supply chain disruptions globally and across
nearly all industries. - Examples
- Automotive
- High Tech
- In our opinion, given these disruptions, supply
chain management is likely to be elevated to a
new level of importance within all shippers
organizations.
29Impact of Recent Events
- Complexity of supply chain management increases
- Firms will be forced to examine inventory
management techniques - Balance minimizing inventory carrying costs
versus cost of production disruptions - Adjust inventory management to Just-in-Case in
order to smooth any disruption - Examine need for global sourcing of raw materials
30Impact of Recent Events
- Complexity of supply chain management increases
- Firms will be forced to ensure access to all
modes of transportation and reduce reliance on
any one mode - Domestic
- International
31Impact of Recent Events
- Weak U.S. and Global Economies
- Increases the need for shippers to focus on
operational and financial improvements - Rationalize all non-core operations as a means of
improving financial performance and increasing
shareholder value - Will likely drive further growth in the
outsourcing of transportation and supply chain
management functions - Provides further growth opportunities for the
traditional 3PLs
32 33(No Transcript)