Gas Detection Strategies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Gas Detection Strategies

Description:

How do I understand the specifications that are given to me? ... borders around the TLV, you may only detect 90% of TLV, and not actuate an alarm ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: julies89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gas Detection Strategies


1
Gas Detection Strategies
  • Overview of Selection Criteria for Gas Detection
    Systems

2
How do I choose?
  • Which Gas Detection Technology is best for my
    application?
  • What criteria is important to me?
  • How do I understand the specifications that are
    given to me?

3
Which Technology is Best for my Application?
  • Understand that there are different technologies
    for most gases
  • Understand that some technologies do not work for
    certain gases
  • Examples FTIR cannot detect diatomic molecules
    (Cl2, Br2)
  • Example Paper Tape (Chemcassettes) cannot
    detect Hydrogen

4
Which Technology is Best for my Application?
  • Develop a selection criteria and use it to
    evaluate the different technologies
  • Make sure you are comparing apples with apples
    many suppliers call data by the same name but
    calculate it differently

5
Developing Selection Criteria
  • Questions to Consider Before We Begin
  • Review Fab Monitoring Locations
  • -- Tool Exhaust -- Fab Ambient Air
  • -- VMB -- Gas Cabinet
  • -- Subfab Ambient -- Pump Housings
  • -- Process Protection Applications
  • Do You Want the Same Criteria for Each Location?

6
Developing Selection Criteria
  • What is Important for the Application
  • (Usually Same List / Sometimes Different
    Priorities)
  • Specificity
  • Speed of Response
  • Lower Detectable Limits
  • Reliability
  • Accuracy
  • Cost of Ownership
  • Initial Cost of Capital Investment

7
Developing Selection Criteria
  • Establish a Spreadsheet for each Monitoring
    Application (Ambient, Exhaust, Gas Cabinet, etc.)
  • List your Criteria
  • Rank your Criteria
  • Sort your list by Rank
  • Evaluate each technology by the criteria
  • Choose the technology that best meets your needs

8
Developing Selection Criteria
9
Developing Selection Criteria
10
Developing Selection Critera
  • You May Ask Yourself.
  • Specificity? Speed of Response?
  • Reliability? Accuracy? Lower Detectible Limits?
  • What Does Do These Terms Really Mean to Gas
    Detection?

11
Specificity
  • No cross sensitivities to other substances
    commonly used in a semiconductor fab
  • Review manufacturer data this information
    should be published and readily available
  • Be sure to include non toxics in your review such
    as cleaning solvents!!! They may have undesirable
    effects on your gas detection system.

12
Speed of Response
  • Speed of response is the most difficult data to
    compare between technologies
  • Several factors affect speed data
  • Data often stated differently from technology to
    technology, makes comparison difficult
  • Hidden technical aspects unique to each
    technology

13
Speed of Response
  • Statements of Response
  • 30 seconds at TLV
  • Response time usually varies over the range of
    the technology, slower at lower concentrations,
    faster at higher concentrations
  • T90 in 30 seconds
  • Sensors responds to 90 of the concentration in
    30 seconds, hits a response peak, levels out and
    very slowly responds to the last 10.
  • If the leak concentration borders around the TLV,
    you may only detect 90 of TLV, and not actuate
    an alarm

14
Speed of Response
  • Statements of Response
  • Other Factors to Consider
  • Some technologies respond to a leak at the end of
    a fixed period
  • Some have to verify the leak if other cross
    interferences are present, adding to the time to
    alarm
  • Many technologies do not have the same response
    time over the lifespan they are quick when
    first installed but become slower, more sluggish
    the longer they are installed in the field. When
    recalibrated at specific intervals, concentration
    response is measured but many test companies do
    not log the time to response, showing that the
    sensor is responding much slower than expected.

15
Speed of Response
  • Statements of Response
  • Other Factors to consider (continued)
  • Some technologies are not continuous, so the time
    it takes to scan between points needs to be added
    in
  • Beware of suppliers who tell you their response
    is instantaneous that is NOT data! Ask them
    to define instantaneous with data. You will find
    it means 10, 20, 30 seconds.

16
Lower Detectable Limit
  • LDL is important to semiconductor industry due to
    high air flow rats
  • High air flows can dilute gases to a level
    undetectable by some technologies
  • No monitor starts at zero every has a level
    between zero and LDL which is electronic noise
    where they cannot reliably detect. Question
    0-100 as a monitoring range.

17
Reliability
  • High air flows can dry out /cause false
    detections on some technologies
  • Cross-sensitivities
  • Drift (caused by temperature, humidity, air flow)
  • RF interference can cause false positive
    detections

18
Reliability
  • Look for extensive self-diagnostics that can
    compensate for known problems
  • Can the detector compensate for drift and
    translate it as a maintenance issue not a false
    gas alarm?
  • Can the detector identify problems that could
    cause it to miss a gas detection (paper tape
    out of tape, electrochemical dried or failed
    sensors, FTIR spectrums overlapping the target
    gas detection wave length area)

19
Accuracy
  • Gas detection should have a stated accuracy
    specification
  • Example /- 10 the direct reading
  • Example /- 10 at TLV
  • These statements do NOT mean the same thing!

20
Accuracy
  • Example minimum of 2 full scale drift per
    month
  • Point Understand what this means if the
    technology has a narrow monitoring range, and is
    maintained every 6 months, the sensor could
    easily drift into the alarm range. If the
    sensor has a large scale, probably not a big
    problem.

21
Cost of Ownership
  • Cost of consumables
  • Cost of labor ask for an estimated of hours
    per point and compare by using a standard labor
    rate
  • Example .25 hr per point x 500 points x 25.00
    a hr.
  • Dont forget to add time to suit up and move
    around in the fab!

22
Initial Investment Cost
  • When comparing this cost it is helpful to average
    it with the cost of ownership over 5 years.
  • Many technologies are expensive up front but
    inexpensive to maintain
  • Many technologies are inexpensive up front but
    expensive to maintain

23
Understand your Trade Offs!
24
How Do I Choose?
  • Back To Our Initial Question!
  • Establish what your corporate requirements and
    priorities are
  • Work with suppliers to understand the data you
    are being asked to review
  • Correlate the data with your priorities to make
    your selection

25
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com