A Model of Team Assessment for Children with Language Learning Difficulty PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 84
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Model of Team Assessment for Children with Language Learning Difficulty


1
A Model of Team Assessment for Children with
Language Learning Difficulty
  • ASHA, Chicago
  • 1623
  • November 21, 2008

2
Plan of Talk
  • A. Introduction (CCSN) Center for Children with
    Special Needs
  • B. Case 1 Terri
  • C. Case 2 Michael
  • D. Question Answer

3
Who we are
  • An interdisciplinary team, consisting of
  • Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics (DBP)
  • Neuropsychology
  • Speech Language Pathology
  • Education
  • Social Work
  • Case Managers
  • Researchers

4
What we do
Heliotherapy for infants with Vitamin D
deficiency - 1920
  • Evaluation of children with a diverse range of
    disabilities
  • Treatment of specific conditions

5
Conditions we see - EVALUATION
  • ADHD
  • Learning Disabilities (e.g., dyslexia)
  • Behavior Disorders (e.g., ODD)
  • Intellectual Impairment
  • Psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression)
  • Autism Spectrum Disorders
  • Receptive Expressive Language Disorders
  • Phonological Disorders

6
Special Education Eligibility(MA)
yes
THE STUDENT IS ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION
7
Services - TREATMENTS
  • Behavioral counseling
  • Psychotherapy
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Teaching about how to access services
  • Counseling about special education law and how to
    access services
  • Community outreach, e.g., classroom observations

8
Interdisciplinary model
9
Philosophy of Model
  • Child behavior and development are inseparable
  • More than one clinician is required to evaluate
    all of childs needs
  • Treatment is informed by interdisciplinary
    perspectives

10
Process
  • How we carry out our philosophy

11
Process How we put the philosophy into action
Steps of the evaluation
  • Review of intake materials, e.g., teacher
    questionnaire
  • Scheduling of child for evaluation(s)
  • Evaluations are completed
  • Team meetings
  • Feedback to parents (e.g., invitation to
    educators)
  • Report(s)

12
The clinical disciplines at the CCSN
13
Developmental - Behavioral Pediatrics
  • Ludwig von Hahn

14
What is a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrician
(DBP)?
  • Born out of general pediatrics and the care
    needed by children with complex needs
  • Understanding of families and of children over
    time
  • Integration of development and behavior
  • Interdisciplinary work

15
What is a DBP evaluation?
  • Components of DBP evaluation
  • Review of Intake materials
  • Interview
  • child observations
  • child assessment
  • physical examination
  • Feedback session

16
Neuropsychology
  • Susan Barron

17
What is a Neuropsychologist?
  • A psychologist who specializes in the study of
    brain-behavior relationships
  • A psychologist who looks at how neurological
    dysfunction compromises behavior

18
What is a neuropsychological evaluation?
  • Evaluate and treat people, i.e., children, with
    suspected nervous system dysfunction.

19
What is a neuropsychological evaluation?
  • NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
  • Clinical Interview -
  • parents
  • child
  • Assessment (4 - 6 hours)
  • Attention
  • Perception
  • Language
  • Memory
  • Motor
  • (Personality Dynamics)
  • Conferring with School Personnel as Deemed
    Appropriate
  • Scoring and Integration of Data
  • Feedback Session
  • Production of Written Report
  • (Parent Counseling)

20
Speech Language Pathology
  • Kathleen Reilly

21
What is a diagnostic SLP?
  • Works with caregivers
  • Assesses children
  • Collaborates with educators

Talking more than informing and persuading it
is Listening to enhance the judgment of a parent
(Luterman, 2008)
22
What is a diagnostic SLP evaluation?
  • Review of Intake
  • Parent Interview (abbreviated) 1 hour
  • Plan Assessment 1.5 hours
  • Formal testing, only as needed
  • Informal testing
  • (Outreach to educators)
  • Parent Exit Interview

23
What is a diagnostic SLP evaluation?
  • Interview Questions
  • Who lives in the home?
  • What language(s) are spoken?
  • How is school going this year?
  • Have you been in touch with Educators?

24
Education
  • Cathy Mason

25
What is an Educational Specialist?
  • M.Ed with special needs certification

26
What is an Educational Evaluation?
  • Review intake
  • Parent interview
  • Thorough assessment of the following
  • Reading (phonological awareness, letter/word
    recognition, decoding, fluency, comprehension)
  • Writing (handwriting, spelling, punctuation,
    sentence/paragraph formulation, story/essay)
  • Math (quantitative knowledge/concepts,
    computations, applications/problem-solving)

27
What is an Educational Evaluation? (continued)
  • Parent feedback on test results
  • Classroom Observation (optional)
  • Team Meeting with colleagues
  • Written report

28
Quick Questions?
29
Case 1
  • Terri, 5 years old

30
Case 1 Terri. What the chart review said about
Terri
  • Wears glasses
  • Early developmental milestones notable for
    speech/language delays
  • Vanderbilt questionnaires Parents. 2/9 symptoms
    of inattention and 2/9 symptoms of
    hyperactivity/impulsivity
  • Vanderbilt questionnaires school. 8/9 symptoms
    of inattention and 9/9 symptoms of
    hyperactivity/impulsivity.

31
Case 1 Terri. What the parents said about Terri
32
Case 1 Terri. What Terri revealed about herself
  • Play skills
  • Complete a task (clean-up)
  • Following instructions for physical examination
  • Testing/screening results speech/language
    delays, fine motor delays, inattention/hyperactivi
    ty

33
Case 1 Terri DBP evaluation
34
Case 1 Terri DBP evaluation
35
Case 1 Terri DBP evaluation
36
Case 1 Terri. Summary of DBP findings
  • ADHD
  • Speech/language delays
  • Visual fine motor delays

37
Case 1 Terri S/L evaluation
  • A.
  • Review of Intake
  • Parent Interview (abbreviated)
  • B.
  • Plan Assessment
  • Formal testing, only as needed
  • Informal testing
  • C.
  • Parent Exit Interview
  • A.
  • Intake
  • Terri in a half day language based program IEP
    with ST 2x30
  • Mom is dyslexic does Terri have it?
  • English only

38
Case 1 Terri S/L evaluation
39
Case 1 Terri S/L evaluation
  • A.
  • Review of Intake
  • Parent Interview (abbreviated)
  • B.
  • Plan Assessment
  • Formal testing, only as needed
  • Informal testing
  • C.
  • Parent Exit Interview
  • B.
  • Assessment
  • Prior testing unavailable
  • BSRA
  • TACL-3
  • EOWPVT
  • Lang sample
  • GFTA-2 Soap Story
  • Play Lang Sample

40
Case 1 Terri S/L evaluation
41
Case 1 Terri S/L evaluation
42
Case 1 Terri S/L evaluation
43
Case 1 Terri S/L Evaluation _at_ 57 years
44
Case 1 Terri S/L evaluation
  • A.
  • Review of Intake
  • Parent Interview (abbreviated)
  • Why are you here? How can I help you?
  • B.
  • Plan An Assessment
  • Formal testing, only as needed
  • Informatl testing
  • C.
  • Parent Exit Interview
  • C.
  • Parent Exit Interview
  • Counseling
  • Talk about conversational deficits

45
Case 1 S/L Parent Exit Interview (feedback)
46
Case 1 Terri S/L Parent Exit (feedback)
47
Case 1 Terri Team Meeting
  • Participants DBP S/L
  • Findings were consistent
  • Shows mixed mild receptive language delays in
    listening concepts underdeveloped
    conversational skills (pragmatics) secondary to
    ADHD.
  • Dyslexia is not a question for this age
    (preschool)
  • Parents are frustrated with her energy level and
    lack of responsiveness to their input
  • Ongoing parental counseling and support to use
    talking strategies
  • Trial of medication

48
Case 1 Terri Feedback with DBP
  • Discussed strategies for inattention
  • Discussed strategies for improving language
  • Follow-up plans
  • Medication plans

49
Case 1 Terri DBP feedback
50
Case 2
  • Michael, 5th grader

51
Case 2 Michael Intake
  • Intake Information
  • What the chart review/parent interview revealed
    about Michael, a 10 yr.old 5th grader
  • Parent Concerns
  • difficulties with reading/reading comprehension
  • school testing fragmented
  • inappropriate/inadequate services.

52
Case 2 Michael Intake
  • Background/history Information
  • Birth, medical, developmental, social/emotional
    histories benign. Family history of dyslexia.
  • Enrolled in a regular classroom in a school of
    grades K-4.
  • Difficulties began in kindergarten learning
    letters/sounds.
  • Repeated K.
  • Continued difficulty with literacy skills despite
    small group, pull-out, rule-based (Wilson)
    reading instruction 4 x 45 min/week and
    speech/language services.

53
Case 2 Michael Intake - continuedPrior
school testing (3rd grade)
54
Case 2 Michael
  • Neuropsychological Testing - Susan

55
Case 2 Michael NP /Neuropsychological
Evaluation
  • Tests Administered - Summary
  • WISC-IV
  • TT
  • BNT
  • NEPSY Sentence Repetition Test
  • Buschke Learning and Memory
  • WRAML - Story Memory Subtest
  • Assessment of Buccal-lingual Praxis

56
Case 2 Michael NP Data
  • NP Index Scores - WISC-IVFull Scale IQ 98
    (45thile)

57
Case 2 Michael NP WISC
  • VCI vs PRI type of info
  • What split means
  • Significant splits vary by age

58
Case 2 Michael NP Assessment - 2
59
Case 2 Michael NP AssessmentStory Memory Job
Story (Ages 9.5 )
  • The day before high school graduation, Judy heard
    from her soccer coach about a job at the hospital
    gift shop. Stopping there on her way home from
    school, Judy filled out the 2-page application,
    and an interview was scheduled for Thursday.
  • Maybe it was the good luck bracelet she wore at
    the interview, but after talking to the store
    manager, Mr. Stone, Judy was asked to start right
    away. She was to be paid 8.00 an hour, work 6
    hours each day, and have Mondays off.
  • Judy enjoyed the work, and by the end of the
    summer she had earned more than 500. and
    received an invitation to return next June as an
    assistant manager.

60
Case 2 Michael NP FINDINGS
  • Strengths
  • Attention
  • Perception
  • Comprehension
  • Memory
  • Motor
  • Weaknesses
  • Expressive Language
  • Word finding
  • Buccal-lingual praxis

61
Case 2 Michael
  • Speech-Language Testing - Kathleen

62
Case 2 S/L Assessment
  • A.
  • Review of Intake
  • Parent Interview
  • (abbreviated)
  • B.
  • Plan Assessment
  • Formal testing, only as needed
  • Informal testing
  • C.
  • Parent Exit Interview
  • A.
  • Addl to Intake (30 min)
  • No new information
  • English only
  • Size up parent (frustration about slow progress
    and increasing academic delays) despite services
  • Parent Question What is the nature of my sons
    LLD?

63
Case 2 S/L Assessment
  • A.
  • Review of Intake
  • Parent Interview
  • (abbreviated)
  • B.
  • Plan Assessment
  • Formal testing, only as needed
  • Informal testing
  • C.
  • Parent Exit Interview
  • B.
  • Assessment
  • Prior testing available
  • R/E lang average
  • (TOLDI, PPVT, TAPS-3)
  • No S/L services on IEP
  • EOWPVT
  • TLC-2
  • Language Sample

64
Case 2 S/L Assessment
65
Case 2 S/L Assessment
66
Case 2 S/L Assessment
67
Case 2 S/L Assessment DATA
68
Case 2 S/L Assessment Findings
  • Strengths
  • Scatter limited to expressive tasks, that is
    Michael knew inference but could not put
    explanations in words
  • Relative strength in use of vocabulary, when
    retrieval controlled for
  • Expressively, relative strength at word level,
    and decreasing verbal skills beyond, in sentences
    and discourse, and most notably in open-ended
    contexts
  • Weaknesses
  • Morphosyntax
  • Complex language
  • Discourse words/relations
  • (Paul, 2001)
  • Temporal e.g., after
  • Causal e.g., because
  • Conditional e.g., if/then
  • Epistemic e.g., that
  • WH-conjunctions e.g., ..where
  • Specification e.g., that
  • Adversative e.g., but

69
Case 2 Michael
  • Educational Testing - Cathy

70
Case 2 Michael
  • Academic Profile

71
Case 2 Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement
  • Purpose school achievement,
  • grades 1 - 12
  • Description K-TEA II consists of two overlapping
    forms Comprehensive and Brief. The Brief Form
    globally samples the areas of reading,
    mathematics, and spelling, whereas the
    Comprehensive Form measures more specific skills
    in the areas of reading decoding and
    comprehension, mathematics applications and
    computation, and spelling.

72
Case 2 Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement
II (KTEA-II)
73
Case 2 The Root of Michaels Reading Disorder
  • Phonological Processing Disorder
  • Phonological awareness is an understanding that
    words we hear have an internal structure based on
    sounds (phonemes).
  • If a student is not sensitive to the phonological
    structure of speech, instruction in the use of
    letters to represent sounds in words will not
    make much sense, and the student will have a
    difficult time making inferences about
    letter-sound regularities and use these to decode
    many words.

74
Case 2 Michaels Reading Disorder
  • What is Rapid Naming?
  • The ability to read well depends on automaticity
    in recognizing and reading orthographic patterns.
  • Word finding problems in speed and accuracy
    differentiate average from dyslexic readers from
    pre-reading to adulthood.

75
Case 2 Comprehensive Test of Phonological
Processing
The CTOPP assesses phonological awareness,
phonological memory, and rapid naming, in
children from ages 50 - 24 years. The CTOPP
assesses phonological awareness, phonological
memory and rapid naming. A deficit in one or
more of these phonological processing abilities
is the most common cause of reading disabilities.
                        
76
Case 2 Comprehensive Test of Phonological
Processing
77
Case 2 Effect on Michaels Reading / TEXT
  • According to legend, the phoenix is a bird that
    rises from its own ashes. The phoenix is
    described as a beautiful bird with feathers of
    red and gold and a very melodious voice. Its
    life span is said to be 500 to 600 years. When
    it feels death approaching, it sings a mournful
    song. Then it builds a funeral pyre of wild
    cinnamon, and dies in the flames. But it arises
    anew from the ashes to begin another long life.

78
Case 2 Written Expression
  • The Written Expression subtest of the K-TEA-II
    requires the student to complete writing tasks in
    the context of an age-appropriate story format.
    Tasks include writing sentences from dictation,
    adding punctuation and capitalization, filling in
    missing words, completing sentences, combining
    sentences, writing compound and complex
    sentences, and starting at the spring of grade 1,
    writing an essay based on the story the student
    helped to complete. The essay tasks focuses on
    elements such as quantity, subject matter,
    organization, logical flow of ideas and planning.

79
Case 2 Effect on Michaels Writing
  • The Amazing Scrapbook
  • Text
  • Emily and Ramon discover a magic scrapbook when
    helping their neighbor clean her attic that
    transports them to the location of any picture
    they put in the book, and when they write in the
    scrapbook, they return to the attic. They visit
    Tahiti, an ant farm and the moon. Before using
    the last scrapbook page, they read a newspaper
    article about a lost boy. They decide to rescue
    him by placing his picture in the scrapbook.

80
Case 2 Michaels Story Summary
  • There was amazing thing haping there is a cool
    crapbook that takes you places like China. The
    boy was so halping to be back with his famil,
    those to chids saved the boys life. Thise haping
    a Miss Browns house the cids found this scrapbok
    and they were heros. They went the an ant farm.
    How they got back bye yousing writing words.
    How they got in bye a pictures.

81
Case 2 Team Meeting on Michael
  • Participants NP, SLP, and ED Specialist
  • Evidence of expressive language disorder
  • Word reading / decoding skills significantly
    delayed due to underlying phonological processing
    and rapid naming disorder.
  • Reading comprehension was depressed at levels
    consistent with word reading skills
  • Written language depressed secondary to oral
    language disorder

82
Case 2 Feedback With Michaels Parents
  • Elicit parents questions and concerns
  • Present findings
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses
  • Implications for learning
  • Recommendations
  • Final questions

83
In closing
  • Weve looked at Interdisciplinary process from
    top to bottom in two straightforward assessment
    cases
  • 5 year old girl with ADHD and a mixed
    receptive/expressive language delay
  • 11 year old 5th grade student with expressive
    language disorder and dyslexia
  • Collaboration can cross discipline boundaries,
    I.e., M.D. vs Ph.D. vs M.Ed vs CCC
  • Collaboration can transcend medical models
    (etiology-driven) and educational models
    (deficit-driven)
  • We hope from this talk you take away ideas and
    motivation to collaborate more deeply within
    school and into home

84
ContactFor a copy of slides and/or questions
  • Kathleen Reilly
  • kreilly_at_tuftsmedicalcenter.org

http//www.floatinghospital.org/OurServices/Specia
lServices/CenterSpecialNeeds
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com