Forest simulation models in Belgium: main developments and challenges PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Forest simulation models in Belgium: main developments and challenges


1

COST ACTION FP0603 Forest models for research
and decision support in sustainable forest
management
  • Forest simulation models in Belgium main
    developments and challenges
  • WG1

1st Workshop and Management Committee
Meeting.Institute of Silviculture, BOKU.8-9 of
May 2008Vienna, Austria
2
Main features of Belgian forests
  • Forest cover (total/share) 693.000 ha (23)
  • Growing stock, annual growth and cuts 4 106 m³
    wood used from own forests,
  • In addition 7 106 m³ wood imported
  • Main species picea, (scots) pine, beech, birch,
    oak, poplar
  • Main non-wood products and services passive
    recreation, nature protection, biodiversity
  • Main risks fragmentation, deforestation
  • Management and silvicultural characteristics
    small patches, abundant private ownership, high
    productivity management practices

3
Forest modelling approaches and trends
  • Empirical models
  • No own developments
  • Recent research is concentrating on mechanistic
    modelling and decision support

4
Forest modelling approaches and trends
  • Mechanistic models Which exist
  • ANAFORE (ANAlysing FORest Ecosystems), growth, C
    and H2O balance, stand scale
  • Main features rather complex, will become user
    friendly, includes effects of changing climate
    (and ozone) and management
  • FORUG carbon and water balance model, stand
    scale
  • SECRETS growth, C and H2O balance, stand scale
  • ASPECTS-WiTCh water, carbon, nitrogen cycles in
    plant and soil, and major cations (Na, K,
    Ca2,Mg2), anions (Cl-, SO4-, HCO3-) and pH in
    soil water, vegetation growth, weathering, etc
    (stand scale)
  • CARAIB water and carbon cycles, photosynthesis,
    growth, competition of plant types, plant
    type/species potential ranges (regional,
    continental or global scales)
  • C-Fix Main features
  • Based on Remote Sensing hence Spatially
    explicit.
  • Continental to global scale.
  • Includes effects of changing climate, with a
    coupled carbon hydrological
  • approach.
  • Output (GPP, NPP, NEP) available on the WWWeb.

5
Simulators and information systems
  • Stand level simulators
  • ANAFORE, can be downloaded at http//
    www.simfortree.be
  • Forest level decision support systems
  • SimForTree decision support system under
    construction, based on ANAFORE
  • running Flemish project, http//www.simfortree.be
  • AFFOREST developed within European project,
    www.sl.kvl/afforest
  • C-Fix Operational forest flux production
  • http//geofront.vgt.vito.be/geosuccess/relay.do?di
    spatchintroduction

6
Research highlight
  • Including mechanistic simulation of wood density
    in function of growth/envirmonment/management
    (from pipe theory)
  • Multicriteria decision support (allowing multiple
    goals in finding the optimal management
  • Including bayesian optimisation and uncertainty
    (underway)
  • Application of remote sensing in area and carbon
    flux estimations using the VEGETATION instrument

7
Future challenges
  • In Belgium forests are very fragmented
  • A lot of small patches are in private ownership
    without common management practices.
  • Decision support management is needed at the
    forest patch level.
  • Multipurpose forestry is required in Belgium
    (because of limited available area). Recreation,
    biodiversity and nature protection are important
    forest functions.

8
Innovative references
  • Deckmyn G., Verbeeck H., Op de Beeck M.,
    Vansteenkiste D., Steppe K., and R. Ceulemans.
    ANAFORE a stand-scale mechanistic forest model
    that includes wood tissue development and labile
    carbon storage as affected by climate, management
    and tree dominance.
  • Garcia Quijano J, Deckmyn G, Moons E, Proost S,
    Ceulemans R, Muys B (2005) An integrated decision
    support framework for the prediction and
    evaluation of efficiency, environmental impact
    and total social cost of domestic and
    international forestry projects for greenhouse
    gas mitigation description and case studies.
    Forest Ecology and Management, 207(1-2) 245 -
    262.
  • Garcia-Quijano, J.F., Deckmyn, G., Ceulemans, R.,
    Van Orshoven, J., Muys, B. (2008). Scaling from
    Stand to Landscape of Climate Change Mitigation
    by Afforestation and Forest Management a
    Modeling Approach, Climatic Change, 86397-424.
  • Gilliams, S., J. Van Orshoven, B. Muys, H. Kros,
    G.W. Heil and W. Van Deursen, 2005. AFFOREST
    sDSS a metamodel based spatial decision support
    system for afforestation of agricultural land.
    New Forests 30 33-53.
  • Goddéris Y., L.M. François, A. Probst, J. Schott,
    D. Moncoulon, D. Labat, D. Viville, Modelling
    weathering processes at the catchment scale with
    the WITCH numerical model. Geochim. Cosmochim.
    Acta 70, 1128-1147, 2006.
  • Laurent J.-M., L. François, A. Bar-Hen, L. Bel,
    R. Cheddadi, European Bioclimatic Affinity
    Groups data-model comparisons. Global Planet.
    Change, 61, 28-40, 2008.

9
Innovative references
  • Van Orshoven, J., Gilliams, S., Muys, B.,
    Stendahl, J., Skov-Petersen, H., Van Deursen, W.,
    2007. Support of decisions on afforestation in
    North-Western Europe with the Afforest-sDSS. In
    Heil, G.W., Muys, B., Hansen, K. (eds.)
    Environmental Effects of Afforestation in
    North-Western Europe From Field Observations to
    Decision Support. Springer Publ., Series Plant
    and Vegetation Vol. 1, 227-247.
  • Steppe, K., D.J.W. De Pauw, R. Lemeur and P.A.
    Vanrolleghem. 2006. A mathematical model linking
    tree sap flow dynamics to daily stem diameter
    fluctuations and radial stem growth. Tree
    Physiology 26 257-273.
  • Verstraeten W. W. , Veroustraete F., Feyen J,
    2006. On temperature and water limitation of net
    ecosystem productivity Implementation in the
    C-Fix model. Ecological Modelling 199 422.
  • Verbeeck, H., R. Samson, F. Verdonck and R.
    Lemeur. 2006. Parameter sensitivity and
    uncertainty of the forest carbon flux model
    FORUG a Monte Carlo analysis. Tree Physiology
    26 807-817.
  • Verbeeck H, Samson R, Granier A, Montpied P,
    Lemeur R. Multi-year model analysis of GPP in a
    temperate beech forest in France. 2008.
    Ecological Modelling 21085-103.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com