Our Watershed In Conjunction with the Ocean Institute and Miocean - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Our Watershed In Conjunction with the Ocean Institute and Miocean

Description:

Our Watershed In Conjunction with the Ocean Institute and Miocean – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: svu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Our Watershed In Conjunction with the Ocean Institute and Miocean


1
Our WatershedIn Conjunction with the Ocean
Institute and Miocean
  • Presented by Mrs. Sanders
  • Fifth Grade Class
  • La Tierra Elementary School
  • Principal - Dr. Callison

2
La Tierra Elementary SchoolSaddleback Valley
Unified School District
Our school is located in Mission Viejo. Our
watershed is the Aliso Creek Watershed and it is
30.4 square miles large.
3
Scientific Method
  • We used the scientific method of having a
    question, making a hypothesis, conducting an
    experiment, and reaching a conclusion to find out
    more about our watershed.

4
Question
  • The question we have about our watershed is
    Which part of the water is cleaner the origin
    of Aliso Creek, the section of Aliso Creek by
    our school, or the area where Aliso Creek enters
    the ocean?

5
Hypothesis
  • After we had a question we created a hypothesis.
  • The water at the origin of Aliso Creek will be
    cleaner than the water at La Tierra, and the
    water at La Tierra will be cleaner than the water
    at the exit of Aliso Creek into the ocean.

6
Experiment
  • To prove or disprove our hypothesis we started
    with observing our creek.
  • Next we got water samples from the three sources
    the mountain origin, our part of the creek at La
    Tierra, and the ocean exit.
  • We separated into small groups and each group
    conducted several experiments to test the health
    of our water.

7
Observing the Creek
  • When we walked down to our creek we found many
    common trash items.

Plastic Bag
Paper Cup
Plastic Bag
8
Observing the Creek
  • We also found several unusual objects in our water

Baseball Hat
Bicycle Tire
Sign
9
Observing the Creek
  • We, unfortunately, also saw wildlife living with
    the trash.

Crane
Ducks
Ducks
10
Separating into GroupsGroup 1
11
Separating into GroupsGroup 2
12
Separating into GroupsGroup 3
13
Tests
  • Temperature
  • Turbidity
  • Dissolved Oxygen
  • pH
  • Nitrates
  • Phosphates
  • Coliform

14
What is Temperature?
  • Temperature is the level of heat or coldness of
    an object

15
What is Turbidity?
  • Is the measurement of the clarity of the water
  • It shows how much stuff, such as clay, silt,
    organic and inorganic matter, is in the water

16
What is Dissolved Oxygen?
  • Dissolved oxygen is oxygen dissolved in the water
    that the animals use to breathe
  • Healthy aquatic ecosystems contain high levels of
    oxygen
  • High levels of bacteria and decomposing plants
    can cause the levels to decrease

17
What is pH?
  • pH tells us how acidic or basic the water is
  • If the water is too acidic or too basic the
    plants and animals have a difficult time
    surviving
  • Typical water pH is usually between 6.5 and 8.2

18
What are Nitrates?
What are Phosphates?
  • Nutrients used by all plants and animals to build
    protein
  • Primary nutrient source
  • High levels of this nutrient can lead to
    overgrowth of plants
  • Difference between Nitrates and Phosphates?
  • Phosphates come from sources that include human
    and animal waste, industrial pollution, and
    agricultural runoff
  • Nitrates come from sources that include,
    decomposition of dead plants and animal, sewage,
    fertilizer, and agricultural runoff

19
What is Coliform?
  • Coliform is a naturally occuring bacteria in
    everybody's digestive track
  • Coliform bacteria are rare or absent in
    unpolluted water. Because of this, it is a
    reliable indicator of water pollution

20
Results
  • Using the LaMotte low cost water monitoring kit,
    we placed our results on a scale of 1 to 4
  • 1 being poor and 4 being excellent

21
Temperature
  • Our temperature results were slightly off because
    the samples of the origin and exit to the ocean
    were left in the classroom for several days this
    is why they are the same temperature
  • Aliso Creeks school sample sat out in the
    classroom but for a much shorter period

22
pH
  • The pH of all three sites was good
  • In fact the ocean scored slightly higher than the
    origin and the creek by the school
  • This shows that all sites are in good health in
    regards to pH
  • These results do not support our hypothesis

23
Turbidity
  • The results show that the water at the origin and
    at the ocean had excellent clarity, but that the
    water at our school had only fair clarity
  • This means that Aliso Creek by our school had
    more particles in the water
  • These results do not support our hypothesis

24
Dissolved Oxygen
  • Our results showed that the oxygen at the origin
    and our creek site were fair (2) and that the
    ocean was poor (1)
  • These results tell us that our origin and our
    creek site are somewhat healthy, but that our
    ocean is not
  • This supports the last section of our hypothesis,
    which states that our creek site is healthier
    than our ocean site.

25
Nitrate
  • With the Nitrates we had several errors. After
    doing two tests we realized that we needed 5 ml
    of water not 10 ml
  • The results we were able to obtain showed that
    all testing sites got a score of 1
  • This shows that the water is in poor health in
    regard to Nitrates
  • These results do not support our hypothesis

26
Phosphate
  • Phosphates for the origin and the exit to the
    ocean were good, however, our school site was
    only fair
  • This shows that the origin and the exit to the
    ocean are slightly healthier than our school site
  • This does not support our hypothesis

27
Coliform
  • The results of our coliform test showed that
    there was coliform bacteria at all three test
    sites.
  • This indicates pollution at all three sites.
  • This does not support our hypothesis

28
Conclusion
  • When adding all the areas together and finding
    the mean (average) we found that our hypothesis
    was disproved
  • The origin of Aliso Creek water was the
    healthiest, followed by the exit to the ocean,
    and finally the school site
  • Unfortunately, we also found that all three test
    sites were only fair in relation to health

29
What Happened?
  • As a class we came up with several theories about
    why our results did not match up with our
    hypothesis
  • Between here and the ocean there might be an
    estuary that absorbed some of the pollution
  • Between here and the ocean there might be a slow
    portion of the river that allowed sediment and
    pollution to fall to the bottom of the river
  • The samples were taken by different people and
    the result might have changed our data
  • The samples were taken on different days and
    because of recent rainfall our results might
    have been effected.
  • The area by our school might be more of a dumping
    site

30
How Can We Improve Aliso Creek?
  • Put recycle cans in the area around the creek to
    encourage people to recycle
  • Get signs that remind people to not pollute
  • Educate people of the community by creating a
    flyer that shows our findings
  • Schedule a clean up day to clean up the creek
  • Fence in the area around the creek
  • Contact the news media about our creek situation
  • Write an article in our school paper informing
    the student body of the creek situation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com