Preliminary Risk Analysis : a french experience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Preliminary Risk Analysis : a french experience

Description:

Annick MACREZ, Hopital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP. Benjamin MEYER, CNEH ... v nement Amorce ' Damages ' Cons quences ' Danger/threat. 1. 6. 5. 4. 3. Contact Event ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: internatio77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preliminary Risk Analysis : a french experience


1
Preliminary Risk Analysis a french experience
Quality and Safety in Health Care
  • Patrice BLONDEL, Centre Hospitalier de
    Saint-Denis
  • Annick MACREZ, Hopital Bichat-Claude Bernard
    AP-HP
  • Benjamin MEYER, CNEH

2
Speakers
  • Patrice BLONDEL
  • Hygienist Physician
  • CH Saint-Denis (93) 800 beds, 1300 profs.
  • Ecole Centrale Paris
  • Missions promote hygienic politics, training,
    studies
  • AFGRIS President
  • Annick MACREZ
  • Risk manager since 2002
  • Education Ecole Centrale Paris
  • Hopital Bichat-Claude Bernard APHP- Paris
  • Missions to animate and coordonate risk and
    quality management training and application of
    risk methodologies, meetings, monitoring of
    hospital accreditation
  • AFGRIS Vice-president
  • Benjamin MEYER
  • Quality and risk management engineer, consultant
    at the CNEH
  • Education Ecole Centrale Paris
  • Missions training, project management, audit in
    french public and for-profit hospitals about
    quality and risk management
  • Member of AFGRIS since 2007

3
  • AFGRIS French Risk Managers Association
  • Founded in 2001
  • 200 members hospitals and healthcare
    institutions (public/for-profit/non-profit
    general/specialized/teaching hospitals)
  • Missions
  • Experience feedback
  • Methods and tools mutualisation
  • Professional meetings and workshops
  • Annual congress october (next one 10/16 17
    PARIS  Safety care Management )
  • 2 think tanks nosocomial infection control
    risks mapping
  • Linked to the Portuguese and Spanish RM
    Association
  • http//www.afgris.asso.univ-paris7.fr/

4
How can we reduce risk in health care ? A
methodand a tool Preliminary Risk Analysis
(PRA)(APR Analyse Préliminaire des Risques)
5
Preliminary Risk Analysis
  • Method developped in the 60s military and
    aeronautic fields
  • An  a priori  method promoted by Ecole Centrale
    Paris
  • Why using the PRA ?
  • To prevent probability and severity of
    critical/adverse events during an healthcare
    process (ex. nursing, medication preparation,
    hospital waste)
  • To give a comprehensive vision of a process by
    identifying and managing its risks
  • How to build the PRA ?
  • Identify all the potential risks in the process
    and their consequences
  • Score and classify each of them
  • Develop prevention measures and implement safety
    parameters  paramètres de sécurité 

6
Concepts-definitions
  • Chain of events? Root Cause Analysis

Daprès A. Desroches, École Centrale Paris-CNES
3
5
Dangerous situation  Situation dangereuse 
ACCIDENT

?

?
4
6
Triggering Event  Évènement Amorce 
Damages  Conséquences 
7
Concepts-definitions
Example
5
Secondary Infection (legionnellose)
3
1
Legionnella
Legionnella in room patient

?
2

?
Obstructed filter
4
6
Immuno-depressed Patient (inhalation)
Death
8
Concepts-definitions
Daprès A. Desroches, École Centrale Paris-CNES
2
Contact Event
1
System/process
3
Dangerous situation
5
Triggering Event
4
9
Concepts-definitions
  • Danger/threat
  • The potential of damages on persons, goods or
    environment
  • Substance gas, toxic product
  • Object virus, equipment, tool
  • Phenomenon fire, flood
  • Process organisation failure, medical error,
    treatment error
  • Dangerous situation
  • state of the system facing a danger or a threat

10
The PRAs methodology
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats (generic and
    specific)
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales severity, probability,
    criticality, effort
  • Making of the PRA chain of events
  • Analyse the results
  • Determine and organise risk reducing actions
    Manage residual risks

11
1.Building the PRA system/process
  • Who are the actors ?
  • What are the limits ?
  • What are the steps ?
  • What are the fonctions/missions ?
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk
  • Example
  • Study made by Evelyne JOFFRION,
  • consultante CNEH, 2007
  • Patient care process in an emergency department
    (ED)

12
Patient satisfaction rate
Room occupancy rate
Performances
Hospitalisation rate
Waiting time
Macro Process
Patient
care in the ED

Primary cares
Continuity in patient care
Admission

Medical care
Registration and Patient medical record
Nursing care
Orientation and transfer
Diagnostic
Continuity of care and patient release
Patient medical record closure
Exams rooms
Triage
Patient monitoring
Identification of the patient
Archiving
Elementary tasks
Care beds availability outside the hospital
Regulation
Patient Flow variability
Specific units availability
Human resources
13
Micro process pattern (7 logical diagrams)
14
2.1 Building the PRA list of dangers
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk

15
2.1 Building the PRA list of dangers
Example Patient care process in an emergency
department ? 4 generic dangers
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk

16
2.2 Building the PRA mapping
  • Goals
  • Determine feared/adverse events  évènements
    rédoutés  for each specific danger
  • Crosscheck these feared/adverse events with each
    step of the studied process/system
  • Score from the most vulnerable dangerous
    situations to less vulnerable
  • 1 extremly vulnerable
  • 2 vulnerable
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk

dangerous situation mapping
17
Ex 1 Dangerous situations mapping
subsystem
Step 1
Step
Dangerous situations
18
Ex. 2 Dangerous situation mapping
19
(No Transcript)
20
Ex. 3 Dangeroussituation mappingPatient care
in the ED
21
Step I patient admission
Step
Transfer and settle patient
Open patient record
Patient Reception
subsystem
Complete or create electronic patient record
Complete or create paper Patient record
Complete or create paper Patient record
Look after anterior record
Identify patient reasons
Identify nursing needs
Check patient identity
Decid patient transfer
Monitoring patient
Transfer patient
Prepare stetcher
Settle patient
GENERIC DANGERS
SPECIFIC DANGERS
CRITICAL EVENTS
Health complication
2
1
1
Non detection of a criticial behavior
2
1
1
Patient
No identification of patient or his need
2
2
2
1
Aggresive behavior / violence
2
1
1
HUMAN FACTORS
STAFF MEMBER
No staff involvment
2
2
Individual behavior
Bad hard skills
2
2
2
Bad relationships within the team
2
2
2
2
2
1
STAFF MEMBER
Bad relationships with the other hospital teams
2
2
2
Interaction
Soft skills absence
2
2
1
2
MANAGEMENT
INADAPTED HUMAN RESOURCES
Not enough
2
1
2
2
1
No tutoring
2
2
22
2.3 Building the PRA scales
  • Team project must build their own
  • Scale of severity damages
  • Scale of probability (occurency)
  • Criticity matrix (risk acceptability)
  • Scale action level (effort)
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk

23
Severity Scale / Echelle Gravité G
24
Probability Scale / Echelle probabilité P
25
Criticity matrix
26
Example in Patient care in the ED
27
Performance
Safety
28
2.4 PRA of chain of events
  • Goals
  • Analyse each dangerous situation and find
  • what are the contact event ?
  • what are the triggering event ?
  • are treatment yet existing ?
  • Score each chain of event (P G C)
  • For C2 and C3 determine risk reducing actions
    with their efforts (protection/prevention)
  • Score again each residual C2 and preview safety
    parameters ( paramètres de sécurité ).
  • This is the residual risk management.
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk

29
2.4 score the initial risk
Initial risk
Feared event consequences (severity scale)
Risk assessment
30
Example
31
2.4 score the residual risk
Initial risks
Residual risks
Resolution actions (prevention/protection)
Risk measurement
Assurance of resolution action
Effort
32
Example
33
2.4 PRA results
34
3.Global Results
  • Statistic treatment of the risk assessment
  • Dangerous situation mapping (ED process)

1
2
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk

35
3.Global Results
  • PRA Results by specific dangers

1
2
36
3.Global Results
  • Criticity Repartition by dangers

37
3.Global Results
  • Result of critical steps for Logistic danger

38
3.Global Results
  • Result of critical steps for Human danger

39
Farmer Diagram
3. Results of ED Process
Inacceptable
Acceptable
40
Kiviat Diagram
3. Results of ED Process
41
4. Risk reduction residual risk
  • Action Plans (CHANGE)
  • Training (good practice, sandards and regulation)
  • Writing nursing transmissions during cares
  • Improvment of patient waiting conditions (room,
    decoration, equipment, delay, triage)
  • Creation of an identity vigilance unit managed by
    a physician coordinator
  • Implementation of electronic patient record
  • Writing organisational procedures (use of patient
    rooms patient transfer)
  • Residual risk Management (FOLLOW)
  • Creation of a safety parameters listing
    containing indicators, evaluation measures
    (audit, studies, Assessment of Professional
    Practice)
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk

42
4. ED process
  • 6 major risks identified
  • Lack of patient monitoring
  • Lack of professional pratice writing
  • Care delays
  • Nursing cares needs identification failures
  • Patient violence
  • 38 action plans
  • Management (13)
  • Professional practice (12)
  • Equipement/resources management (8)
  • Management process and traceability (3)
  • Training/information (2)
  • 13 safety parameters listing
  • Examples
  • Care delay between patient admission and patient
    triage
  • Describe the system/process
  • Build the PRA
  • List of all the dangers/threats
  • Dangerous situations mapping
  • Building of scales
  • PRA of the chain of events
  • Present the results
  • Risk reduction and residual risk

43
Conclusion
  • PRA
  • comprehensive risks analysis method
  • technical tool of identification, priorization
    and risks handling
  • PRA Strenghts
  • A communicative, interactive and dynamic time
    for a team/unit/establishment
  • Involve the whole staff in a dynamic improvment
    with realistic action plans
  • True decision making tool for managers

44
Conclusion
  • PRA Weaknesses
  • Training needed before using it (score, scales,
    method) ? time-consuming
  • Technical method with a specific vocabulary which
    forces users to translate or adapt the PRA to the
    professionals
  • Assessment professional culture is needed. Teams
    must take time to anticipate and think about
    preventive improvment actions
  • Success Keys Factors
  • Designate a trained project manager supported by
    top management
  • Involvment of the team project (concerned
    professionals active in the process)
  • Most of all adapt the PRA to the level and goals
    of the team project

45
  • Thank you very much
  • for your attention

46
Contact
  • Patrice BLONDEL
  • pabl_at_club-internet.fr
  • Annick MACREZ
  • annick.macrez_at_bch.aph.fr
  • Benjamin MEYER
  • benjamin.meyer_at_cneh.fr
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com