Deuterium Implantation In Si/SiO2 Interface - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Deuterium Implantation In Si/SiO2 Interface

Description:

CHC lifetime based upon 10% change in gm for NMOS devices annealed in FG and D2 for two ... Comparison of D2 and H2 annealed device characteristics. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: AB283
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Deuterium Implantation In Si/SiO2 Interface


1
Deuterium Implantation In Si/SiO2 Interface
  • Presented
  • By,
  • Amrita
    Banerjee
  • 01.31.05

2
Introduction
  • Reliability of Si/SiO2 interface in MOS
    transistors remained the focus of mainstream
    research for a long time.
  • Problem with Dangling Bonds
  • Leakage current at the Si/SiO2 interface.
  • Reduced channel conductance.
  • Deviation from the ideal Capacitance- voltage
    characteristics.
  • In 1971 Nicollian et.al. used H2 to passivate the
    dangling bonds

Ref D. Misra , R.K.
Jarwal, Journal of The Electrochemical Society,
149 (8), 2002.
3
Use of Hydrogen in the Interface
  • Passivates the Dangling Bonds at the Si/SiO2
    interface.
  • Pb H2 PbH
    H
  • Hence it reduces the interface trap charge
    density and improves the stability of the device.
  • Reduces the leakage Current.
  • Improves the Threshold Voltage distribution
    and the Transconductance significantly with
    respect to a reference device (control).
  • - In an untreated
    wafer, the mean and variation of the threshold
    voltage and the transconductance are very high,
    which is beyond the acceptance level.

Ref D. Misra , R.K. Jarwal, Journal of The
Electrochemical Society, 149 (8), 2002.
A.H. Nicollian et al, J. Appl.
Phys. 42, 1971
4
The Problem unsolved by Hydrogen
  • Further a time-dependent degradation of metal
    oxide semiconductor ( MOS) transistor performance
    results due to the hot electron effects.
  • Hot electrons stimulate the desorption of
    hydrogen from Si/SiO2 interface region.
  • Ref J.W. Lynding et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68
    (18), 29 April 1996.
  • S.N Rashkeev et al. Phys. Rev Lett.
    87(16), 15 October 2001.



5
The advent of Deuterium
  • It has been proven that Deuterium implication is
    much more efficient than that of traditional
    Hydrogen.
  • Deuterium is much more difficult to remove under
    the condition used to desorb Hydrogen due to the
    additional neutron mass.
  • It improves the Transconductance distribution
    compared to hydrogen.
  • Transistor life time increases by a factor of 10-
    50.
  • It also improves the threshold voltage.
  • It is suitable for integrated circuits and
    multilevel dielectric and metallization layers.
  • Ref J.W. Lynding et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68
    (18), 29 April 1996.
  • R.A. B. Devine et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70
    (22), 2 June 1997.

6
Graphical comparison between D2 and H2 annealed
devices.
  • Expression for, Threshold Voltage Shift,
  • ? Vt (q/ Cox) d Nit
  • Where, d Nit Number density of
    interface states averaged over the channel
    length.
  • Cox Gate oxide
    capacitance
  • q electronic
    charge.
  • Expression for channel transconductance
    degradation
  • ?Gm a d Nit/ (1 a d Nit) Gmo
  • Where, Gmo Ungraded channel

  • transconductance.
  • a processing
    related parameter.
  • Vt can be written in terms of ?Gm , which
    is-
  • ? Vt (q/ Cox) ?Gm /Gmo 1- ?Gm
    /Gmo

The channel transconductance measured in a 0.25
mm MOSFET subjected to hot-electron stressing.
The source-drain voltage was 3.5 V and the
substrate current, 0.14 mA. h! hydrogen annealed
devices, l! deuterium annealed devices.
Ref R.A.B. Devine et al. Appl Phys. Lett. 70
(22), 2 June 1997.
7
Contd.
8
Contd.
Ref J.W. Lynding et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68
(18), 29 April 1996.
9
Contd.
  • The degradation of gate induced drain leakage (
    GIDL) current under hot- carrier stress was
    studied in n- channel MOSFETs that were annealed
    in Hydrogen and deuterium and then compared.

Ref Kangguo Cheng et al. IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE
LETTERS, VOL. 24, NO. 7, JULY 2003
10
Analytical Model to project MOS lifetime
improvement by Deuterium Passivation of interface
traps.
  • It is a universal model by which the device
    lifetime improvement due to deuteration can be
    projected.
  • ?NitH(t) -?NitM(t) CD ?NitH(t)
    -?NitD(t)
  • Where, ?NitH(t), ?NitM(t), ?NitD(t) are
    the interface trap generation at given tress
    time, t.
  • Interface trap generation under hot- carrier
    stress can be described by the power law,
  • ?Nit (t) Atn A fitting parameter.
  • Depending on the above relation the first
    equation can be written as,
  • (AHtn AMtn) CD (AHtn ADtn)
  • or,
  • AM AH CD(AD - AH) these are
    prefactors of the transistors.
  • Therefore, the life time improvement factor
    (IMP),
  • tM/tH ?NitM(t)/ AM1/n/
    ?NitH(t)/ AH1/n AH /AM 1/n

Ref IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, VOL. 24, NO.
10, OCTOBER 2003
11
Electrical and Physical Characterization of
Deuterium sinter
  • Comparing the impact of deuterium sinter (under
    two different annealing condition, 4500C/60min,
    4500C/90min) with the traditional Forming Gas
    (FG) sinter over a NMOS transistor, it is seen
    that D2 sinter at 60 min increases the life time
    10 times over the FG sinter.

CHC lifetime based upon 10 change in gm for
NMOS devices annealed in FG and D2 for
two different sinter times.
Ref A.G.Mogul et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 (14),
6 April 1998.
12
Contd.
  • High pressure deuterium annealing reduces the
    annealing time and increases the life time as
    well.
  • It shows, for example, annealed at 6
    atm. for 1h annealed at 2 atm. for 3h.
  • Ref Jinju Lee et al. IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE
    LETTERS, VOL. 21, NO. 5, MAY 2000

hot electron degradation lifetime versus
substrate current for these devices which come
from wafers having four metal layers with nitride
sidewalls and SiON capping layer
13
Reliability of thin oxide grown on Deuterium
implanted silicon substrate
  • In that case deuterium incorporated at Si/SiO2
    interface before the application of gate oxide.
  • It was done through a low energy ion implantation
    into Si substrate.
  • This process was done at a dose of 1X1014/cm2 at
    25 keV.
  • It showed a improved charge- to- breakdown
    characteristics.
  • Ref D Misra and R.K. Jarwal. IEEE TRANSACTION ON
    ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 48, NO. 5, MAY 2001

14
Results
  • It was observed through the conductance method
    that Dit or Nit is much smaller (at 25 KeV) than
    compared to the other cases.
  • Reduction of Dit improves the charge-to-
    break characteristics.

Ref D Misra and R.K. Jarwal. IEEE TRANSACTION ON
ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 48, NO. 5, MAY 2001
15
Results
Ref D Misra and R.K. Jarwal. IEEE TRANSACTION ON
ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 48, NO. 5, MAY 2001
16
Interface Hardening with Deuterium Implantation
  • It is now known that hot carrier degradation in
    MOS transistors has a great impact on threshold
    voltage instability, transconductance
    degradation.
  • The generation of interface trap charge is due to
    hot carrier stimulated hydrogen desorption and
    silicon dangling bond passivation.
  • Replacing hydrogen with deuterium has the same
    impact but it is more advantageous.
  • As chemical properties of Hydrogen and deuterium
    are virtually almost same, so there occurs no
    basic changes in the experiment as well.
  • It was also examined that if nitrogen is
    implanted into the Si substrate at low - energy
    and after that the deuterium is implanted into
    that substrate ( by ion implantation process)
    before gate oxide formation, then the oxide
    reliability increases.
  • Deuterium implantation has a uniform distribution
    where as diffusion has a localized effect due to
    side- wall spacers.

Ref D.Misra and R.K. Jarwal, Journal of the
Electrochemical Society, 149(8), 2002 DMisra et
al, Electrochem. Solid- state Lett. 15,
460,1999.
17
Results
Given figure shows that implanted deuterium
partially neutralizes the oxide/ interface
charge. It is also clear that deuterium implanted
at 25KeV shows the maximum Si/SiO2 interface
charge passivation.
Figure 1. The flatband voltage shifts and net
oxide charge extracted from high-frequency C-V
measurements for various deuterium implanted
samples.
18
Contd.
Representation of possible deuterium diffusion
The figure shows that interface passivation
depends on the implantation condition.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of possible
deuterium diffusion in silicon for various
implantation conditions shows that deuterium
might have out-diffused for 15 keV implantation
and never reached the interface for 35 keV
implantation during gate oxide growth.
19
Contd.
The average values of initial electron trapping
slopes (IETS) for25KeV implanted devices are
shown in this figure.
Figure 3. The average values of the initial
electron trapping slope for the 25 keV
deuterium-implanted samples when compared to
control device. Initial oxide trap creation was
suppressed for deuterium-implanted sample.
20
Contd.
(a) Measured conductance at 1 MHz as a function
of gate voltage for various samples and (b)
conductance peak for 25 keV implanted sample at
two different frequencies.
21
Results
Figure 5. Peak Nit values for different deuterium
implantation conditions indicate that Nit went
through a minimum value (for 25 keV implantation)
as a function of implantation energy.
Figure 6. Density of interface traps Dit as
obtained from the conductance measurements. The
trap energy ET is with respect to intrinsic Fermi
level EI
22
Advantages
  • Deuterium atoms incorporated at 25 KeV, not only
    passivate the danling bonds and forms Si- D bonds
    at the Si/SiO2 interface, but also forms the Si-
    D bonds at bulk SiO2.
  • Deuterium implantation before gate oxide
    application is an effective way to improve the
    oxide quality by interface hardening.
  • Previously described process takes less time
    than that of the annealing through traditional
    back- end process.
  • Reduction of oxide charge due to deuterium atoms
    implications indicates the improvement of gate
    oxide quality.
  • Compared to FG annealing, Deuterium annealing
    gives better threshold voltage stability and
    reliability characteristics even to the hafnium
    oxide gate dielectric MOSFET under high voltage
    stress.

23
Drawback
  • It was observed that Negative Bias Temperature
    Instability (NBTI) is accelerated by
    high-pressure hydrogen or deuterium annealing
    compared to FG annealing. It not only causes
    higher density of oxide charges but also causes
    interface defect.

Ref Jae Sung Lee et al. IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE
LETTERS, 2004.
24
Application
  • The effects of low- temperature deuterium
    annealing on the reduction of dark currents in
    the CMOS active pixel sensor ( APS) have been
    investigation.
  • It is also found that dark currents generated
    from the photo diode, transfer gate and floating
    diffusion node region can be reduced more by
    using deuterium annealing process.
  • It is observed that there occurs a significant
    reduction of hot- carrier- induced 1/f (flicker)
    noise of MOS transistors using deuterium anneal
    over traditional hydrogen anneal.

Ref Hyuck In Kwon et al. IEEE Transactions on
Electron devices. Vol. 51. No.8, Aug. 2004.
Zhi Chen et al. IEEE Electron Dev. Lett., 2003.
25
Summery
  • Problem with dangling bonds.
  • Interface trap charge passivation by H2.
  • Comparison of D2 and H2 annealed device
    characteristics.
  • Properties of Deuterium implantation at the
    interface.
  • Deuterium implantation before gate oxide growth
    and its result.
  • Interface hardening with deuterium implantation
    and its results.

26
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com