Title: TMR 4220 Naval Hydrodynamics Manoeuvring and Ship Handling
1TMR 4220 Naval HydrodynamicsManoeuvring and
Ship Handling
- In this part of the course the items
- IMO requirements on ship manoeuvrability
- Ship design and dynamic stability
- Linear and non linear equations of motion
- Finding hydrodynamic coefficients
- Ship handling simulators
- Ship handling in confined waters
- will be presented through lectures, in-class
discussions, web - based material and written exercises
2TMR 4220 Lecture 2005.04.04
- Administrative matters
- Changes in lecture schedule
- Visit to SMSC?
- Lecture notes
- Learning material
- Lecture notes (at Institute office, cost NOK 100)
- Lecture foils
- Written exercises (2)
3Revised lecture plan
4TMR 4220 Lecture 2005.04.04
- Topics
- IMO and manoeuvring characteristics
- Examples of documentation of standard tests
- Linear equations of motion for surface vessels
- Stability types for ship manoeuvring studies
- Geometric ship characteristics and dynamic
stability
5TMR 4220 Naval Hydrodynamics
- Learning objectives
- Explain characteristics of standard manoeuvres
defined in IMO resolution - State how standard manoeuvres shall be performed
- Describe selected other standard manoeuvres used
for evaluation of a ships manoeuvring
characteristics
6TMR 4220 Naval Hydrodynamics
- Learning objectives
- Show how to develop the combined sway yaw
linear motion equations - Describe conditions to be fulfilled when linear
equations can be used - Demonstrate steps taken to develop the
characteristic equation for study of dynamic
stability - Show how to find necessary and sufficient
conditions for dynamic stability - Demonstrate use of Rouths method for stability
investigation
7TMR 4220 Naval Hydrodynamics
- Learning objectives
- Demonstrate calculation of initial acceleration
when the rudder angle is changed - Demonstrate calculation of steady state values
after a rudder angle change - Show how to calculate steady state turning radius
from yaw speed - Explain applications of Nomotos equation
8Design spiral
- Manoeuvring performance is one item to check
during the ship design process - This is the only course in the marine technology
MSc study where manoeuvring performance is
discussed
9Why is manoeuvring performance important?
- Space requirements for different types of
manoeuvres - Control of own vessel in confined waters
- Control of own vessel in complex ship to ship
operations
10Example Lightering operations
- Transfer of liquids between vessels steaming at
slow speed (Louisianna Offshore Oil Port LOOP) - Increased use of storage and export tankers,
example Belokamenka
11IMO and manoeuvring documentation
- Resolution MSC.137(76)
- Standards for ship manoeuvrability
- Ships constructed on or after 1 January 2004
- Methods are either scale model tests and/or
computer predictions using mathematical models
(at design stage) or full scale tests - All vessels of 100m in length, and chemical
tankers and gas carrier regardless of length
12IMO and manoeuvring documentation
- Resolution MSC.137(76) Criteria
- Turning ability (advance and tactical diameter)
- Initial turning ability (distance covered before
course change of 10 degrees when 10 degrees of
rudder is applied) - Yaw-checking and course keeping abilities
(overshoot angles) - Stopping ability (distance)
13IMO MSC Res. 137(76) - Highlights
- Section 1
- Invitation to Governments to encourage those
responsible for design, construction and repair
and operation of ships to apply the Standars to
ship constructed on or after 1. January 2004
14IMO MSC Res. 137(76) - Highlights
- Section 2 General
- Standards are based on the understanding that the
manoeuvrability of ships can be evaluated from
the characteristics of conventional trial
manoeuvres - Two methods can be applied to demonstrate
compliance with these Standards - Scale model tests and/or computer predictions at
the design stage (full-scale trials should be
conducted to validate these results) - Demonstrate compliance based on results of full
scale trials
15IMO MSC Res. 137(76) - Highlights
- Section 3 Application
- Ships of all rudder and propeller types when
length is greater or equal to 100 m - Chemical tankers and Gas carriers regardless of
length - Ship undergoing repairs, alterations and
modifications based on an evaluation by
Administration
16IMO MSC Res. 137(76) - Highlights
- Test requirements
- Test speed used in the Standards is a speed of at
least 90 of ships speed corresponding to 85 of
the maximum engine output - Conditions when running tests should be
- Deep, unrestricted water
- Calm environment
- Full load, even keel condition
- Steady approach at test speed when initiating the
tests
17Manoeuvring Standards Criteria
- Turning ability (turning circle, rudder angle 35
degrees (or equivalent)) - Advance should not exceed 4.5 ship lengths
- Tactical diameter should not exceed 5 ship
lengths - Initial turning ability
- Using 10 degree rudder, the vessel should not
travel more than 2.5 ship lengths by the time the
heading has changed 10 degrees from the original
heading
18Manoeuvring Standards Criteria
- Yaw checking and course keeping abilities - 10/10
degrees Zig-Zag test - First overshoot angle should not exceed
- 10 degrees if L/U is less than 10 seconds
- 20 degrees if L/U is 30 seconds or more
- (5 0.5L/U) degrees if 10 seconds lt L/U lt 30
seconds - Second overshoot angle should not exceed
- 25 degrees if L/U is less than 10 seconds
- 40 degrees if L/U is 30 seconds or more
- (17.5 0.75L/U) degrees if 10 seconds lt L/U lt
30 seconds
19Manoeuvring Standards Criteria
- Yaw checking and course keeping abilities - 20/20
degrees Zig-Zag test - First overshoot angle should not exceed 25
degrees
20IMO check of PROBO vessel
- Lpp 163 m
- B 32.2 m Lpp/B
5.06 - Tsc 11.27m
- Td 9.14m B/Td
3.52 - CB 0.823
- 10/10 zig zag test, U 7.5 m/s
- 3 different aft body design tested
21Probo 10/10 Z test, results
22Manoeuvring Standards Criteria
- Stopping ability
- Track reach in the full astern stopping test
should not exceed 15 ship lengths - Value may be modified by Administration where
ships of large displacement makes this criteria
impracticable, but should in no case exceed 20
ship lengths
23Buzz group no. 1
- Which of the IMO Manoeuvring Standards criteria
will be most difficult to fulfill for - A modern VLCC
- A modern container vessel
- Present your arguments for the rest of the
students
24IMO MSC Circ. 1053 (see Annex 3)
- Explanatory Notes to the Standards for Ship
- Manoeuvrability
- Additional manoeuvres
- Spiral manoeuvres
- Direct spiral manoeuvre
- Reverse spiral manoeuvre
- Simplified spiral manoeuvre
- Pull out manoeuvre
- Very small zig-zag manoeuvre (0/5, 1/5), 20
overshoots
25Additional standard tests
- Pull-out test
- After completed turning circle test, put rudder
amidship and observe yaw speed - Test can be used to check if a vessel is
dynamically stable - Spiral tests
- Direct spiral test, select rudder angle and keep
it constant until yaw speed is constant - Reversed spiral tests, select yaw speed and use
rudder to obtain the selected yaw speed - Plot yaw speed as a function of rudder angle
26Comments to IMO Standards - Dand
- For deep water and service/design speed only
- Give no indication of the handling
characteristics in wind, waves and current - Do not look at manoeuvres normally carried out by
most merchant ships - Full astern stopping test results in extreme
termal loads on the engine - Criteria derived from databases heavily biased
towards (old) tankers and bulk carriers
27Comments to IMO Standards - Qaudvlieg and van
Coevorden
- From operational aspects additional requirements
should be developed - Manoeuvrability in shallow water
- Low speed manoeuvring capabilities
- Maximum tolerable wind forces in harbour
manoeuvres - Limited heel angles
- Steering in waves
- Steering with special devices
28Summary
- Manoeuvring characteristics are important for
safe and efficient ship handling in confined
waters and harbours - IMO has approved a Manoeuvring Standards
Criteria - Criteria should be expanded to account for often
used manoeuvres for merchant ships - New propulsion and control systems change
manoeuvring performance significantly