South African Social Security Agency SASSA: Defining the road ahead Fezile Makiwane - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

South African Social Security Agency SASSA: Defining the road ahead Fezile Makiwane

Description:

Building Financial Acumen. The grants admin system distributes over R55 billion. This is a transaction based institution that requires financial acumen. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: dpsa3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: South African Social Security Agency SASSA: Defining the road ahead Fezile Makiwane


1
South African Social Security Agency
Defining the Road Ahead Building Capabilities of
SASSA 13 July 2005
2
Presentation Outline
  • Background
  • The delivery context
  • Specific institutional challenges
  • Capability constraints of current service
    delivery model
  • The new Service Delivery Model
  • Concluding remarks

3
Background
  • Social assistance is one of the main poverty
    alleviation programs of government targeting
    vulnerable groups and individuals.
  • Through social assistance, government provides
    income support to over over 9.8 million
  • 2,2 million old age pensioners and war veterans
  • 1,3 million disabled adults
  • 140 000 foster care children
  • 90 000 care dependent children
  • 6 million child support grants beneficiaries
  • Budget projected to be in excess of R55 billion
    this year, rising to R60 billion during the MTEF
    period
  • The coverage of the Social grants program has
    increased 3.5 times since 1994, significantly
    reducing the proportion of people that would be
    living in poverty.

4
Delivery context
  • The delivery context is characterized by a range
    of factors
  • that affect any delivery institution in South
    Africa.
  • Some of these factors include
  • Geographical spread of the population
  • Competition for skills
  • The nature of the economy
  • The apartheid legacy
  • Poverty and exclusion
  • Uneven development,
  • Disparities in capacity and infrastructure, etc.

5
Specific Institutional Challenges
  • Despite huge improvements, the current social
    assistance delivery
  • system is beset by a number of deficiencies,
    including
  • Fragmented institutional arrangements
  • A lack of uniformity across Provinces and
    inefficient processes
  • Poor management
  • Unequal distribution and development of human
    resources
  • Questionable competencies and skills
  • high transaction costs
  • High levels of fraud
  • The poor quality of service delivery, long
    distance for some, hours in the queues
  • These problems inhibit access to social
    assistance, despite the fact that
  • such access is constitutionally guaranteed for
    those who are unable to
  • support themselves and their dependants.

6
Assess of Value Chain and Capabilities
7
Capability constraints of the current model
  • To achieve major and quick impact, trade-offs
    need to be made in
  • respect of prioritizing capabilities.
  • A fragmented institutional structure.
  • Disintegrated and inefficient business processes,
    duplication and non-value adding procedures
  • Lack of dedicated, focused corporate support
    functions.
  • Human resource competencies and skills not geared
    toward specialized nature of the service -
    variable staffing standards
  • Inadequate financial acumen given transaction
    nature of business
  • Insufficient, inequitable distribution of
    infrastructure facilities

8
The new Service Delivery Model
9
Institutional Arrangements How will this change?
Financial and Grant Administration reporting
lines maintained
New, independent, corporatised, specialist
agency focused and motivated towards service
delivery
Reporting lines nominal
10
Benefits of this capability
  • The new Institutional Structure will provide
  • Clear lines of accountability,
  • Specialist,
  • focused on core business of grants or benefit
    administration,
  • standardized and consistent approach,
  • Transparent performance management.

11
The business process changes
The Grant Administration process will be
reengineered
  • Fewer steps
  • Less people involved
  • Technology enabled
  • Faster
  • Standardised
  • Easily verified

12
Human resource competencies
  • Staffing structures better aligned to core
    business of services to beneficiaries
  • Staffing numbers, in addition to be equitably
    spread, will have to
  • match with business requirements such as
    frontline specialist,
  • units for compliance,
  • units for beneficiary maintenance and reviews
  • Appropriate and well aligned staff with
    appropriate skills will ensure the grants or
    benefits builds an effective on-ramp and off-ramp
  • Staff development must be in line with service
    delivery requirements and not generic
  • There is a need to develop an effective
    performance monitoring system that is linked to
    norms and standards for delivery that inform the
    KPIs
  • A high performance culture based on effective
    performance measurement systems - output and
    service level focused.
  • A change in culture to a customer-centric focus.
  • Invest in people and their development

13
Building Financial Acumen
  • The grants admin system distributes over R55
    billion. This is a transaction based institution
    that requires financial acumen.
  • The Agency business case is built on the promise
    of reducing the current operational costs of
    6-7per annum
  • Improved budgeting and planning will be achieved
    through beneficiary forecasting models
  • Explicit requirement of financial expertise that
    may require competing with the market for the
    best
  • To address high cost of transactions we will need
    to exploit opportunities that economies of scale
    presents
  • We require an appropriate payment model that will
    redistribute pay points more optimally, to
    migrate people to banks where possible
  • Checks and controls in the processes to prevent
    lower levels of staff processing and approving
    grants in access of R30 000, anaemic to the PFMA.
  • Reconciliation of beneficiary payments that is
    lacking need to be done.
  • Ensuring Compliance to regulations, business
    rules would be explicit, our recent initiatives
    to reduce fraud has indicated that with a minimal
    investment the returns are high
  • Data interrogation with the most sophisticated
    statically analysis tools would be
    institutionalised

14
Optimal use of infrastructure
  • The findings indicate that some people still
    travel distances in access of 50km, and wait
    longer at pay points.
  • We have mapped the distribution of all current
    pay points, Social Dev. offices, government
    infrastructure and financial institutions
  • An efficient and optimal model will make use of
    all current available infrastructure before
    investing in new ones
  • Having set norms and standards, the rules if
    applied should ensure equal access within 5 to
    7km of each individual
  • However, the above proposal requires investment
    in infrastructure, to ensure people are paid in
    dignity.
  • To achieve objectives we aim to migrate
    significant number of beneficiaries to banks
    where available and generate efficiencies to pay
    for current infrastructure shortages

15
Concluding Remarks
  • The Agency must make a difference as the
    expectation are high and benefits realisation
    significant
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com