Title: A Study of Effective Practice in Adult Numeracy Teaching
1A Study of Effective Practice in Adult Numeracy
Teaching
- Diana Coben, Margaret Brown, Valerie Rhodes, Jon
Swain, Katerina Ananiadou, Peter Brown
Kings College London in association with the
National Research and Development Centre
2Research design sample
- 47 Classes
- 30 in FE Colleges (11 16-19s, 19 adults,
including ESOL, ICT, etc), 4 in adult/
neighbourhood colleges, 4 work-place, 2 family
numeracy, 2 jobcentre plus, 2 prison, 1 army, 1
private training provider - In clusters around 6 teacher-researchers in North
Lancashire, Gloucester, London, with other single
locations - Some classes very small
- 471 learners, of whom complete data on 250
3Teacher quotes
- You have a mix of students who are entry level 3
in certain skills and pre-entry in other areas - Tying one persons shoelace when Ive got
someone else in my other ear asking me about
quadratic equations - Its been awful, you know just trying to keep
them in the room (vocation course) - If they find a job, they suddenly disappear from
us
4Research design data
- Test using Skills for Life national survey items
- Attitude questionnaire adapted from TIMSS
- Background questionnaires from teachers and
learners - Interviews with 39 teachers and 112 learners
- Observation of 112 teaching sessions of 47
classes
5Research design assessment
- Test using 20 selected items from national Skills
for Life survey - multiple choice, pictures, 1 item per page
- across areas of numeracy and levels from Entry 1
to Level 2 (sensitivity?) - Attitude questionnaire adapted from TIMSS with 17
items on usefulness, enjoyment and difficulty
6Research design observations
- Narrative account, and summary of phases of
lesson - Reflective sheet with 6 aspects of teacher
approach - subdivided into over 100
characteristics each graded 0-3 - Observer judgements and self-ratings about
transmission/connectionist/ constructivist
balance, and also for open/closed and
active/passive
7Classroom Practice
- Characteristics are organised under 6 headings,
with between 3 and 9 characteristics for each - structure and organisation
- teachers role
- mathematical pedagogy
- learners and learning
- teacher-learner relations
- materials
8Structure and organisation
9Teachers role
10Mathematical pedagogy and relations
11Learners and learning
12Materials
13Results learning gains
14Results class progress
Range in mean class gains from -13.3 to 32.5
15Results by learner background
Significant at plt0.05
16Correlation between practice and progress
- Correlation calculations carried out between
features of practice and progress. Mostly small
and insignificant results - Only significant positive correlation was with
the amount of procedural teaching (r0.45,
plt0.01) - There was a significant negative correlation with
the amount of individual work (r - 0.34, p0.02)
- A surprising negative correlation was with the
use of resources to enhance learning (r - 0.32,
p0.03). Explanation?
17Procedural teaching and progress
18Individual work and progress
19Resources and progress
20Effect Sizes
- We compared teaching practice top 5 performing
classes to the sample overall. The effect sizes
(observed more in top 5 classes) found are shown
in the table (bold significant at p lt0.05) - But some also observed more in bottom 5 classes
21Teacher approach and progress
Little connection was found between teacher
approach and progress made. In the diagrams
below, position of the dot the balance between
the teaching approaches in a class, the colour
the level of gains made by that class (greenvery
good, bluegood, orangepoor, redvery poor). No
patterns. Neither were there significant results
found for degree to which the class was
open/closed or the pupils were active/passive
22Teacher views on approaches
- You need to have taken into account the
learning styles of the different individuals..the
particular resources that are going to suit those
learning styles - You see it form of classroom activity depends
on what were doing, if were doing something
that needs quite a lot of differentiation then - Starting from where the learners areextending
them all as far as they need to go, which is not
the same for everybody. A variety of activities
and a variety of ways of doing things
23Results learners attitudes
- Mean attitude scores increased by a very small
but statistically significant margin of 2 - Learners over 20 and learners of non-British
origins had slightly more positive attitudes at
the start of the course, but British origin
students caught up during course. No other
significant results found with learner
characteristics - The 3 sub-scales (enjoyment, usefulness,
difficulty) didnt emerge in the factor analysis - Difficulty was the only sub-scale where there was
a significant but small improvement
24Learners views on maths
- 20 liked maths at school, 60 didnt
- 52 now enjoyed maths, 32 didnt
- Learners preferred adult numeracy classes to
school 90 expressed satisfaction - When I was in school I was useless and I didnt
want to learn it. But now I want to learn it
thats why I came here. - Boring. Didnt understand it. Now I love it.
Its a challenge. - It makes me so proud, I am going somewhere
- I feel equal, when Im at work I dont feel that
Im a second rate person any more
25Conclusions
- Adult numeracy classes have a huge diversity of
learners - There were few relationships between observed
teaching practice and either learning or attitude
gains, although many learner quotes belie this - Teachers adapted to their circumstances and are
generally judged by learners to be successful - The heterogeneous nature of adult numeracy
teaching, and the number of variables amongst
teachers and learners, make it difficult to
produce findings that can be generalised across
the whole sector
26Learners reasons for taking numeracy course
27Learner quotes on reasons
- I came here because Ive got no GCSEs at
alland my sons going to be 10 and sometimes \i
think he knows more maths than meso I thought I
dont work or anything so I thought Id do my
education. I tried to get on the English but it
was full upbut when you say you are doing maths
people really praise it. And people say Oh why
are you doing maths, its really hard? Its
like a big expectation - I could survive, but I want to learn more
28Other learning factors
- The only motivational reason for attending the
course which was significantly correlated with
gain was to become more confident (plt0.05) - The reason To get a better job was close to
significance (p0.06) - There was no correlation between the gain and the
hours attended
29Results individual progress
30Research design questionnaires
- Learner background data with information about
age, sex, experience, ethnic group, languages,
educational experience, disabilities, employment - Teacher data (gathered in interview) with
information about age, experience,
qualifications, ethnic group and languages etc.
31Research design interviews
- Interviews with 39 of the 40 teachers about their
experiences of and beliefs about adult numeracy
teaching - Interviews with 112 learners about their
attitudes to and experience of numeracy teaching,
including their beliefs about good teaching, and
more details about background
32The learners
- 42 were British origin, 31 Asian, 6 Caribbean,
6 African - 59 had English as their first language
- 20 had previously attended a maths/numeracy
class since school - 40 had a maths/numeracy qualification
- 9 had had numeracy training at work
- 23 reported at least one factor affecting
ability to learn, with dyslexia most frequent(7)
33Learners Characteristics Gender and Age
34Learners characteristics occupational status
35Teachers backgrounds
- Teachers had been teaching maths or numeracy for
13 years on average, adults for 8 years and at
current institution for 6 years - 74 had experience of teaching to GCSE level, 25
at A-level - 56 had taught in secondary schools, 24 in
primary, 77 16-19s, 88 over 19s - 79 had qualification in maths or numerate
subject, 88 had teaching qualification,18 the
new level 4 qualification in adult teaching
36Results by level