Title: Double Taxation Conventions and Beneficial Ownership Clauses
1Double Taxation Conventions andBeneficial
Ownership Clauses
- Congresso Internacional de Direito Tributario
Rio de Janeiro - Philip Baker QC
- Grays Inn Tax Chambers
2Outline
- Background - the beneficial ownership
limitation provision and its meaning - The Indofood case
- The Bank of Scotland case
- Indofood and Bank of Scotland compared
- Some conclusions and implications
31) Background
- E.g. Article 10 (2)
- such dividends may also be taxed in the
Contracting State of which the company paying the
dividends is a resident and according to the laws
of that State, but if the beneficial owner of the
dividends is a resident of the other Contracting
State, the tax so charged shall not exceed .
41) Background
- Found in the Dividends, Interest, Royalties and
Other Income Articles - Very important for reduced withholding tax claims
- Originated in 1977 OECD Model
- Used previously in e.g. US and UK DTCs
51) Background
- Note has a technical meaning in common law
systems beneficial ownership contrasted with
legal ownership - The need for an international fiscal meaning
- French bénéficiaire effectif
61) Background
- What is the meaning of beneficial ownership
- The original OECD Commentary mere nominees or
agents - The Conduit Companies Report (1986) mere
fiduciary or administrator - Commentary amended 1995 and 2002
- A limited anti-shopping provision
72) The Indofood case
- English High Court 7th October 2005
- English Court of Appeal 2nd March 2006
- Why was the case brought in the English courts?
8The Indofood case
Indofood TBK (Indonesia) Parent Guarantor
280 m. 10.375
Indofood International Finance Ltd
(Mauritius) Issuer
280 m. 10.375
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA Trustee
9The Indofood case
Indofood TBK (Indonesia) Parent Guarantor
Indofood International Finance Ltd
(Mauritius) Issuer
Netherlands NewCo
280 m. 10.375
Indofood International Finance Ltd
(Mauritius) Issuer
280 m. 10.375
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA Trustee
10The Indofood case
- Background termination of the Indonesia-Mauritius
DTC - Proposal to insert a Dutch SPV
- Was this a reasonable measure
- The knock-out blows
- A) the Dutch SPV would not be the beneficial
owner of the interest - B) The Dutch SPV would not be a resident of the
Netherlands
11The Indofood case
- The meaning of beneficial ownership
- CA An international fiscal meaning
- Beneficial ownership meant the full privilege
to directly benefit from the income taken from
the Indonesian Dir-Gen of Income Tax
12The Indofood case
- The Dutch SPV would not be the beneficial owner
as - A) It was obliged to pay on the interest in 1 day
- B) Precluded (by the note conditions) from
finding the money from any other source - Regard is to be had to the substance of the
matter
13The Indofood case
- Conclusion
- The Dutch SPV would not be the beneficial owner
- The interposition was not a reasonable measure
14What Indofood decided
- UK law or Indonesian law?
- International fiscal meaning vs. Art. 3(2)
- OECD Commentary
15What Indofood decided
- Is the decision really that surprising?
- The egregious facts
- Same loan in and out
- Same interest in and out
- Fixed timetable
- Issuer was omitted from cash flows
- The Note Conditions precluded funds from any
other source
16Implications of the case
- Limited confirmation of meaning of beneficial
ownership - Question remains how far does it extend?
- Initial HMRC reaction Draft Guidance
- Group finance subs (multiple loans in and out)
- CDOs waterfall arrangements
173) The Bank of Scotland case
- French Conseil dEtat, 29th December 2006
- UK-France Double Taxation Convention of 1968
183) The Bank of Scotland case
Merrell Dow Inc US
3-year usufruct for Frs. 267m
Bank of Scotland - UK
Dividends of Frs. 270m. Plus Repayment of tax
credits and withholding tax of Frs. 74.25m
Marion Merrell Dow - Fr
Marion Merrell Dow Fr
193) The Bank of Scotland case
- Legal background
- 25 non-treaty withholding tax reduced to 15
by Art. 9(6) of the UK-France DTC (with a bo
limitation) - Right to repayment of dividend tax credit under
Art. 9(7) (no bo limitation) - No right to repayment of the dividend tax credit
under the France-US double taxation convention
203) The Bank of Scotland case
- The Conseil dEtat decided
- The transaction was not a usufruct there was an
abuse of legal form it was in reality a loan to
the US parent from the Bank, repaid by the French
subsidiary - The beneficial ownership limitation applied also
to the repayment of the dividend tax credit it
was a general requirement in tax treaties
213) The Bank of Scotland case
- Note the Bank was not nominee or mere fiduciary
- However, the Conseil dEtat confirmed that the
beneficial ownership limitation reflected a
general, abuse of law doctrine to deny treaty
shopping - The repayment of the excess withholding tax and
dividend tax credit was denied
224) Indofood and Bank of Scotland compared
- Both cases suggest a wider use of the beneficial
ownership limitation to counter treaty shopping
not a narrow anti-avoidance measure - The exact meaning of beneficial ownership left
unclear by the English Court of Appeal,
especially the role of the OECD Commentary
234) Indofood and Bank of Scotland compared
- The Conseil dEtat suggest a very wide use of the
beneficial ownership limitation - Note the Bank was clearly not a nominee or agent
or mere fiduciary / conduit (except in a broad
factual sense)
245) Consequences of the Indofood and Bank of
Scotland cases
- HMRC draft Guidance on finance structures more
challenges to claims for reduced / zero
withholding taxes likely - France possibly more challenges on treaty
shopping (a change from the traditional approach
in France) - Background of protecting source country taxation
255) Consequences of the Indofood and Bank of
Scotland cases
- Possibility that other countries will follow
- E.g. Indonesian Supreme Court case 17th October
2006 - Changes to OECD Commentary?
- Do we need more clarification of the meaning of
the beneficial ownership limitation - Are detailed anti-abuse measures needed in DTCs?
26Double Taxation Conventions andBeneficial
Ownership Clauses
- Congresso Internacional de Direito Tributario
Rio de Janeiro - Philip Baker QC
- Grays Inn Tax Chambers