NARRATIVES OF HUMILITY: New Approaches to Writing About Science and Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

NARRATIVES OF HUMILITY: New Approaches to Writing About Science and Technology

Description:

What is the problem with framing science as a technology of hubris? ... Frames the 'can do' aspect of science -- 'technologies of hubris' Narratives of Humility ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: rborc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NARRATIVES OF HUMILITY: New Approaches to Writing About Science and Technology


1
NARRATIVES OF HUMILITY New Approaches to
Writing About Science and Technology
  • Rick Borchelt
  • Genetics Public Policy Center
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • www.DNApolicy.org

2
Narratives of Humility
  • Drawing for this presentation on recent work by
    Sheila Jasanoff, Technologies of humility
    citizen participation in governing science.
  • Technologies of hubris versus technologies of
    humility
  • 2003, Minerva 41 (3) 223-244

3
Narratives of Humility
  • Jasanoff posits that science is usually framed in
    terms of a technology of hubris, that is, as
    linear, objective, problem-solving, and
    self-policing.
  • Framed this way by scientists, but also by
    journalists

4
Narratives of Humility
  • A Field Guide to Science Leads
  • Objective Lead (5Ws)
  • Mystery Lead (and related Contrarian)
  • Eureka! Lead (and related Pollyanna)
  • Rhetorical Question Lead

5
Narratives of Humility
Objective
6
Narratives of Humility
Mystery
7
Narratives of Humility
Contrarian
8
Narratives of Humility
Contrarian
9
Narratives of Humility
Eureka
10
Narratives of Humility
Eureka
11
Narratives of Humility
Pollyanna
12
Narratives of Humility
Rhetorical Question
13
Narratives of Humility
  • Each of these lead types reinforces and
    perpetuates science as a technology of hubris.
  • Infallible (no records of trial and error)
  • Linear (steps and breakthroughs)
  • Same would be true of 95 of journalistic science
    coverage, as well

14
Narratives of Humility
  • What is the problem with framing science as a
    technology of hubris?
  • Creates unrealistic expectations
  • Erodes confidence in scientific enterprise when
    inevitable errors occur
  • Cultivates a cynical public

15
Narratives of Humility
  • Framing science as a technology of humility, on
    the other hand, would highlight
  • Trial and error
  • Significance of failure
  • Episodic and nonlinear nature of discovery

16
Narratives of Humility
  • Product journalism focuses on the finding,
    the outcome, the social implication
  • Process journalism focuses on the process and
    people of science

17
Narratives of Humility
  • Characteristics of product journalism
  • Appear seemingly out of nowhere
  • Announce a breakthrough or step forward or
    advance
  • Frames the can do aspect of science --
    technologies of hubris

18
Narratives of Humility
  • In the event of a discovered problem after
    initial reportage, product journalism has two
    choices
  • Focus on another product, conviction or legal
    process, ignoring the science
  • introduce the process post-facto bewildering to
    the reader, difficult to walk back through the
    process chain

19
Narratives of Humility
20
Narratives of Humility
21
Narratives of Humility
22
Narratives of Humility
  • Characteristics of process journalism
  • Appear in a social/societal context
  • Emphasize science as incremental
  • Report negative results
  • Frames the should do questions of science
    technologies of humility

23
Narratives of Humility
  • We need to begin to utilize narratives of
    humility in science writing and in science
    journalism
  • Covers process as well as product
  • Profiles the discoverers and their methods, not
    just discoveries

24
Narratives of Humility
  • When to engage narratives of humility?
  • normal science ordinary scientific research
  • consultancy science science applied to
    well-characterized problems
  • post-normal or deviant science highly
    uncertain, highly contested knowledge (i.e., for
    health, environmental decision making)
  • Funtowicz Ravetz, 1992, Three types of risk
    assessment and the emergence of post normal
    science.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com