Title: Chapter 4 Monopoly
1Chapter 4Monopoly
2Outline.
- What is a monopoly?
- The profit maximising monopolist
- Price discrimination
- The efficiency loss from monopoly
- Public policy toward natural monopoly
3Definition of a monopoly
- A monopoly is a situation in which the market is
served by only one seller, the product of which
has no close substitute on the market. - Although this definition looks very simple, it is
not that simple to apply in practice. - Examples cinema, train tickets
- The key factor that differentiates the monopoly
from the competitive firm is the elasticity of
demand facing the firm. - Perfectly competitive firm infinite
- Monopoly finite
- One practical measure examine the cross-price
elasticity of demand for the closest substitute
4Five sources of monopoly
- Exclusive control over important inputs
- Examples Perrier, DeBeers
- Economies of scale when the long-run AC curve is
downward sloping the least costly way to serve
the market is to concentrate production in one
single firm this is a natural monopoly.
5Five sources of monopoly (ctd)
- Patents they confer the right to exclusive
benefit from the invention to which it applies. - Costs higher prices for consumers
- Benefits they make possible many inventions that
would not be so otherwise - Network economies on many markets, a product
becomes more valuable as the number of customers
that use it increases. - Example telephones
- May give rise to a monopoly. Example Microsoft
- Government licenses or franchising in many
markets, only those firms that get a license from
the government can set up a business.
6Outline
- The profit maximising monopolist
- Price discrimination
- The efficiency loss from monopoly
- Public policy toward natural monopoly
7Total revenue
- Perfectly competitive firm horizontal demand
curve - So, firms total revenue is given by
8- The monopolist
- Faces a downward
- sloping demand
- If he wants to sell
- more, he needs to
- cut his price
9Total revenue, total cost and economic Profit
10Marginal revenue
- The marginal revenue is the change in total
revenue generated by a very small change in the
amount of output produced. - The monopolist will choose its production level
in order to maximise its profit - P TR TC
- Profit is maximum when
11Marginal revenue (ctd)
- In the case of the monopoly firm, marginal
revenue is always going to be less than the
price.
12Marginal revenue (ctd)
- The monopolist wants to increase production from
Q0 to (Q0 DQ). - ? Needs to lower its price from P0 to (P0 - DP)
where DP gt 0. - The new total revenue is
- (Q0 DQ).(P0 - DP) P0Q0 P0DQ - DPQ0 - DP DQ
- MR (P0DQ - DPQ0 - DP DQ)/ DQ
- MR P0 - (DP/ DQ).Q0 DP
- MR 60 10 (10/50).100 30
13Marginal revenue and price elasticity
- The price elasticity of demand at a point (Q,P)
is given by - The marginal value is given by
14Marginal revenue and demand
- Notice that
- When 8 (for Q 0), MR P
- When gt 1, MR gt 0
- When 1, MR 0
- When lt 1, MR lt 0
- When the demand curve is a straight line
- P a bQ where a,b gt 0
- Then
- TR P.Q aQ bQ2
15Marginal revenue and demand (ctd)
16The short-run profit maximisation condition
17The short-run profit maximisation condition (ctd)
- The profit-maximising mark-up
- Given that
- and MR MC
- It follows that
18The monopolist shut-down condition
- The monopolist should stop production when
average revenue is less than average variable
costs at any level of output
19Monopoly versus perfect competition
- Both choose an output level by weighing the
benefits of expanding (resp. contracting) output
against the corresponding costs - Both compare MC and MR
- The main difference is that for the perfectly
competitive firm, the marginal revenue is equal
to the market price whereas for the monopolist,
it is less than the price - The output level chosen by the monopolist is
lower than the output level chosen by the perfect
competitor
20Monopoly versus perfect competition (ctd)
21Adjustments in the long run
22Outline
- Price discrimination
- The efficiency loss from monopoly
- Public policy toward natural monopoly
23Sales in different markets
- Suppose the monopolist has two completely
distinct markets what quantity should it sell
and what price should it charge in both markets?
24Sales in different markets (ctd)
- The monopolist will charge a higher price in the
market where demand is less elastic to price. - This is called third-degree price discrimination.
- This is feasible only when it is impossible for
buyers to trade among themselves. - If trading is feasible arbitrage
- ? Example train tickets
25Perfect discrimination
- First-degree or perfect discrimination is a
situation in which each unit of product is sold
at each customer at the highest price the
customer is willing to pay for it.
26Perfect discrimination (ctd)
- How much output will the monopolist produce?
27Second-degree price discrimination
- It is a practice according to which sellers do
not post a single price but a schedule along
which price declines with the quantity one buys .
28The hurdle model of price discrimination
- It consists in inducing the most price-elastic
buyers to identify themselves. - The seller sets up a hurdle an offers a discount
to those buyers who jump over it. - The underlying idea is that those buyers who are
most sensitive to price will be more likely than
others to jump the hurdle - Examples.
- The rebate included in a product package.
- Airlines offering restricted fares
29Outline
- The efficiency loss from monopoly
- Public policy toward natural monopoly
30The lost surplus
31The deadweight loss
- If the firm would behave like a perfect
competitor, the whole triangle above the LAC
curve would be consumer surplus - If the firm perfectly discriminates, the whole
triangle becomes producer surplus - If the firm is a non-discriminating monopolist,
part of the consumer surplus is lost . - ? This is the deadweight loss from monopoly
32Outline
- Public policy toward natural monopoly
33 Fairness and efficiency objections
- How does monopoly compare with alternatives?
- Let's consider a technology in which total costs
are given by - TC F MQ
- There are 2 main objections to the equilibrium
reached by the monopoly - The fairness objection the producer earns a
profit which is higher than it would under
perfect competition (P). - The efficiency objection the price is above the
marginal cost ? loss in consumer surplus (S).
34 State ownership and management
- One solution in that case is to have the state
take over the industry. - Advantage the government is not as much
constrained as a private firm. - ? Can set the price equal to the marginal cost
and absorb the corresponding economic losses out
of general tax revenues. - Drawbacks it often reduces the incentives for
cost-conscious efficient management, thus
generating X-inefficiency.
35 State regulation of private monopolies
- The most frequent regulation consists in setting
a price that allows the firm to earn a
pre-defined rate of return on its invested
capital. - Ideally this rate of return should allow the firm
to recover exactly the opportunity cost of its
capital ? be equal to the competitive rate of
return on investment. - However, in practice, regulatory commissions lack
information on what the competitive rate of
return should be.
36 Exclusive contracting for natural monopolies
- Accept that the product be produced by only one
firm but to create strong competition in order to
determine who will be the supplier. - Specify in detail the service that is wanted and
then call for private companies to make bids to
supply this service. - This should be better than state management in
terms of keeping cost down if X-inefficiency is
lower in private than in public firms. - But the advantages of such systems are often more
apparent than real.
37 Antitrust laws
- The most famous antitrust laws
- The Sherman Act (1890). It makes it illegal to
"monopolise or attempt to monopolise any part of
the trade or commerce among the several States". - The Clayton Act (1914) prevents companies from
buying shares in a competitor where the effect
would be to "substantially lessen competition or
create monopoly - The U.S. Justice Department prohibits mergers
between competing companies whose combined market
share would exceed some predetermined fraction of
total industry output.
38 Laissez-faire policy
- A last possibility for dealing with natural
monopolies is laissez-faire, or doing nothing. - ? The main objections to this policy are those
with started with, namely the fairness and
efficiency objections - Efficiency objection the monopolist charges a
price above the marginal cost which excludes many
potential buyers from the market. - But in the case of a two-price monopolist, the
deadweight loss is limited - The more finely the monopolist can partition her
market under the hurdle model, the smaller the
efficiency loss will be.
39 Laissez-faire policy (ctd)
40 Laissez-faire policy (ctd)
- The fairness problem It consists in the fact
that the monopolist transfers resources from
consumers to firms. - Raises a distributional problem
- One argument in favour of the hurdle model of
price discrimination is that most of the profit
earned by the monopolist comes from the high
price elasticity consumers - Overall, each of the policy options for dealing
with natural monopolies has problems. - None completely eliminates the problem of having
only one producer serving a market.