Groups and Organizations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Groups and Organizations

Description:

A sense of solidarity or common identity. What is a social group? 'Groups' that ... Iron Law of Oligarchy. Robert Michels (1876-1936) ... Iron Law of Oligarchy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: evembl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Groups and Organizations


1
Groups and Organizations
2
What are social groups?
  • A social group consists of
  • Two or more persons
  • Regular interaction
  • A sense of solidarity or common identity

3
What is a social group?
  • Groups that are not groups
  • Aggregates collections of people who are in the
    same place physically but who do not interact in
    any meaningful way (can become a group if given a
    common focus of attention)
  • Categories collections of people who share a
    social status may share a vague sense of
    solidarity but do not interact as a group because
    they are not physically in each others presence

4
Social Groups - Types
  • Sociologists are particularly interested in
  • Primary Groups
  • Secondary Groups
  • Reference Groups
  • In Groups
  • Out Groups

5
Groups and Organizations
6
Primary vs. Secondary Groups
  • Primary Groups
  • Smaller, typically permanent groups
    characterized by personal relationships that are
    emotionally bonded members not easily replaced
  • Members of primary groups share many activities
    and spend a great deal of time together
  • Primary group membership shapes our social
    identity
  • Secondary Groups
  • Generally larger than primary groups
    characterized by impersonal, emotionally neutral
    relationships members valued based on roles
  • Secondary groups are devoted to a specific
    activity or goal
  • Can exist for quite some time but memberships
    constantly change

7
The Continuum from Primary to Secondary Groups
8
Reference Groups
  • Groups we look to for guidance and use as a tool
    for self-evaluation (group equivalent of a role
    model)
  • Reference groups serve two functions
  • Normative function set and enforce standards of
    conduct and belief
  • Comparison function a standard by which people
    can measure themselves or others

9
In-Groups and Out-Groups
  • In-Groups groups to which individuals belong
    and toward which they feel pride and loyalty
  • Out-Groups groups to which individuals do not
    belong and to which they feel disdain and perhaps
    hostility
  • Group membership can bias judgments and
    perceptions
  • The distinction between in- and out-groups is
    highly relative!

10
Significance of social groups
  • Studies have shown that when people join a group,
    they are more willing to adopt extreme opinions
    or engage in behavior they otherwise would not
    engage in.
  • Examples
  • Riot situations or concerts
  • Group membership leads to conformity
  • An individuals willingness to behave like or
    take the attitude of others in a group

11
Solomon Asch Experiment (1952)
  • Examined the extent to which group pressure could
    determine one's perceptions
  • Used college students as his research subjects
  • One subject and six confederates in each group he
    studied
  • Asked subject which bar on the bottom is equal to
    the one on the top
  • The confederates answered aloud first and wrong
  • Of those tested, 37 of the 50 conformed to the
    majoritys wrong answer
  • Why?
  • Fear of being ridiculed or thought of as peculiar

12
Groupthink
  • Identified by Irving Janis (1972)
  • The tendency of highly cohesive groups to make
    poor decisions because members are unwilling to
    threaten groups solidarity by voicing opposition
  • Dissent is stifled as consensus emerges
  • Failure to prepare Pearl Harbor for Japanese
    sneak attack
  • Kennedy Administration and Bay of Pigs invasion
  • Watergate
  • Challenger and Columbia explosions
  • What about the current war in Iraq? A possible
    example?

13
Group solidarity
  • What causes groups to stick together?
  • Durkheim Mechanical vs. Organic solidarity
  • Tonnies Gemeinschaft vs. Gesellschaft

14
The Evolution of SocietyEmile Durkheim
(1858-1917)
  • Noted the increasing movement of human societies
    from simple to complex
  • Interested in understanding the maintenance of
    social cohesion in light of the growing
    complexity of society
  • Identified two systems of social organization
  • Mechanical and Organic Solidarity

15
Mechanical and Organic Solidarity
  • Mechanical Solidarity
  • Most societies throughout history
  • Small in scale
  • Economic roles involve multi-tasking
  • Cohesion maintained through similarity of
    experiences
  • Organic Solidarity
  • Results from growth in societal size and economic
    competition
  • Division of Labor Increased Specialization
  • Cohesion maintained through functional
    interdependence

16
The Evolution of SocietyFerdinand Tönnies
(1855-1936)
  • Also examined the consequences of societal change
  • Interested in the reshaping of human associations
    through the modernization of societies
  • Identified to sets of human associations
  • Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft

17
Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft
  • Gesellschaft
  • Rational Will
  • Secondary-emotionless-rational based social
    relations
  • The relationship is a means to an end
  • The individual is more important
  • Commercial activity is the basis of life
  • Gemeinschaft
  • Natural Will
  • Emotional-kinship based social relations
  • The relationship is the end
  • The community is more important
  • Family is the basis of life

18
Formal Organizations and Institutions
  • Formal Organizations
  • Large secondary group that is explicitly designed
    to accomplish specific tasks by means of an
    elaborate division of labor
  • Examples
  • General Motors
  • World Health Organization
  • Institutions
  • Predictable, established ways to provide for one
    or more of a society's basic needs
  • Examples
  • Family
  • Religion
  • Economy
  • Polity
  • Education

19
Formal Organizations
  • A form of secondary group that contains within
    it
  • A set of operating principles
  • An internal structure to coordinate activities
  • A hierarchy of authority--leadership

20
Formal Organizations
  • Types of Formal Organizations
  • Coercive
  • Operations and order are maintained through
    forced compliance (Threat of punishment)
  • Utilitarian
  • Compliance is maintained and operations are
    completed through the promise of rewards
    (Securing financial privileges)
  • Voluntary
  • End goals of the organization are achieved
    through the shared commitment of organizational
    members (normative expectations)

21
Formal OrganizationsVoluntary Associations
  • Over 200,000 such organizations in the U.S.
  • More than half of all Americans belong to one or
    more voluntary associations.
  • Higher income individuals are more likely to
    belong in more than one such association.
  • Men and women participate in voluntary
    associations equally.
  • Whites more likely than any other racial group to
    belong to a voluntary association.

22
Bureaucracy
  • Division of Labor
  • Written Regulations
  • Documentation of Activities
  • Hierarchy of Authority
  • Mobility tied to Objective Qualifications
  • Impartiality

23
Bureaucracy
  • Max Weber
  • As society becomes more complex, it needs a more
    rational based system of organization to operate
    efficiently
  • Bureaucracies will proliferate and dominate
    modern society
  • The continual movement toward rationalization
    will generate social systems that are
    fundamentally dehumanizing

24
Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy
  • Parkinsons Law
  • Work in a bureaucracy expands to fill the time
    available for its completion
  • The Peter Principle
  • Those that do well are promoted upward despite a
    possible lack of traits and skills required for
    success in higher placed positions

25
Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy
  • Communication Problems
  • The direction of communication is downward
    rarely is communication directed upward
  • Trained Incapacity
  • Workers develop tunnel vision incapable of
    responding well to new or unexpected situations
  • Ritualism
  • Become obsessed with following rules to the point
    that rules become the organizations end rather
    than its previously specified goals
  • Goal Displacement
  • Attention is drawn toward survival rather than
    achieving defined ends

26
Iron Law of Oligarchy
  • Robert Michels
  • (1876-1936)
  • Bureaucracies often generate an enormous degree
    of unregulated social power.
  • The problem lies in the nature of bureaucratic
    operation

27
Iron Law of Oligarchy
  • Effective functioning of an organization requires
    the concentration of power in the hands of the
    few
  • Leaders have access and control over information
    that is not available to the rank-and-file
  • Control of information flows contribute to
    greater power and the ability to persuade others
    of the rightness of views, and use of authority

28
Efforts to Improve on the Bureaucratic Model
  • Scientific Management
  • Developed by Frederick Taylor (1856-1915)
  • Applied during early industrialization
  • Sought to improve upon productivity through
    minimizing wasted effort
  • Workers viewed as a part in the production
    machine to be optimized
  • Although it was quite successful it was very
    alienating for workers

29
Efforts to Improve on the Bureaucratic Model
  • Human Relations Approach
  • Sought to increase worker productivity through
    increased morale
  • Make the worker feel like they have a vested
    interest in the company
  • Critics argue that while such an approach is more
    humane it is nothing more than window dressing
  • Collectives Approach
  • Breakaway from strict use of a division of labor
  • Sacrifice maximization of efficiency and profits
    for more humane worker environment
  • Critics can point to the fact that such an
    approach is only functional for small operations

30
Efforts to Improve on the Bureaucratic Model
  • The Japanese Model
  • Success of the Japanese economy in the 1970s
    caused upper management to take a closer look at
    the Japanese Model
  • Collective Hiring and Promotion
  • Used as a means to create team orientationWorking
    together to achieve goals
  • Holistic Training
  • Movement from department to department leading to
    a generalized understanding of the
    wholeOperationally versatile

31
Efforts to Improve on theBureaucratic Model
  • The Japanese Model
  • Decentralized Decision Making
  • Input is encouraged from all workersIncrease
    morale
  • Lifetime Employment
  • Promotion occurs within rather than from movement
    across companiesDevelop worker loyalty
  • Total Involvement
  • Paternalistically involvedCompanies sponsor
    activities for workers outside of the workplace

32
Efforts to Improve on the Bureaucratic Model
  • The Flexible and Humane Bureaucracy
  • Temporary Work Teams
  • Movement and Rearrangement of work teams
  • Collective Responsibility
  • Effectiveness of the group emphasized over the
    individual
  • Minimal Hierarchy
  • Focus is on colleagueship

33
Efforts to Improve on theBureaucratic Model
  • The Flexible and Human Bureaucracy
  • Fewer Rules
  • Less detailed guidelines, workers are entrusted
    with responsibilities
  • Social Inclusiveness
  • Seek participation from women and minorities
  • More Opportunities for Advancement
  • Provide chances for enhancement of worker skills
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com