Chapter 13: The Global Sulfur Cycle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 13: The Global Sulfur Cycle

Description:

Original S pool was in igneous rocks, largely as pyrite (FeS2) Weathering of crust exposes pyrite to O2, causing it to oxidize to SO42- (and H ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: dalewj
Category:
Tags: chapter | cycle | global | sulfur

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 13: The Global Sulfur Cycle


1
Chapter 13 The Global Sulfur Cycle
2
The Global Sulfur Cycle
  • Sulfur is found in valence states ranging from 6
    (SO42-)
  • to -2 (sulfides)
  • Original S pool was in igneous rocks, largely as
    pyrite (FeS2)
  • Weathering of crust exposes pyrite to O2, causing
    it to oxidize to SO42- (and H)
  • SO42- then leaches to oceans

3
The Global Sulfur Cycle
  • Sulfur is found in valence states ranging from 6
    (SO42-)
  • to -2 (sulfides)
  • Original S pool was in igneous rocks, largely as
    pyrite (FeS2)
  • Weathering of crust exposes pyrite to O2, causing
    it to oxidize to SO42- (and H)
  • SO42- then leaches to oceans

4
The Global Sulfur Cycle
  • Sulfur in plants is found in proteins and as
    SO42- (the latter not being noted in the book)
  • Microbial transformations between the valence
    states drive the S cycle
  • Under anaerobic conditions, (SO42- is reduced to
    sulfide forms (H2S, FeS2, others)
  • Anaerobic conditions can also lead to S-based
    photosynthesis

5
The Global Sulfur Cycle
  • No sulfur gas is a long-lived, major constituent
    of the atmosphere
  • Thus, global S cycles must explain the fate of S
    inputs and outputs from the atmosphere
  • Fig 13.1

6
(No Transcript)
7
The Sulfur Cycle and Acid Rain
  • 1960 Eriksson and Junge found that
    SO42-deposition in Sweden was much greater than
    could be accounted for from SO42- / Cl- ratios in
    seawater
  • Must be other sources
  • Dust gypsum (CaSO4) (8 x 1012 g S yr-1)
  • Volcanic eruptions (5 x 1012 g S yr-1)
  • Fossil fuel combustion SO2.
  • The largest source (90 x 1012 g S yr-1)
  • But going down - 40 reduction in the US, more
    in Europe

8
The Sulfur Cycle and Acid Rain
  • Fossil fuel combustion
  • SO2 1/2O2 --gt SO3
  • SO3 H2O --gt H2SO4 --gt H SO42-

9
The Global Sulfur Cycle
  • Transport in rivers
  • 28 to 50 of 130 x 1012 g S yr-1 thought to be
    due to human activities (acid rain, mining, etc.)
  • Some due to rainfall inputs, some due to natural
    pyrite oxidation

10
Sulfur Cycle in the Oceans
  • Seasalt cycles back and forth at a high rate (144
    x 1012 g
  • yr-1)
  • Precip and dryfall 180 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Biogenic gases (e.g., DMS) net export of 16 x
    1012 g yr-1
  • Fig 9.22

11
(No Transcript)
12
Sulfur Cycle in the Oceans
  • Sinks/outputs
  • Biogenic gases 16 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Seasalt transport to land 4 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Hydrothermal vents 96 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Pyrite formation 39 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Pore-water burial 3 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Total 168 x 1012 g yr-1

13
Sulfur Cycle in the Oceans
  • Inputs
  • Rivers 130 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Transport from land 20 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Precip dryfall 180 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Total 320 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Net accumulation in oceans 152 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Hard to document because oceans contain 13 x 1020
    g yr-1

14
The Global Sulfur Cycle Temporal Perspective
  • In primordial earth, volcanic activity causes
    much outgassing of S
  • As oceans condensed, it dissolved and converted
    to SO42-
  • Sulfides probably precipitated

15
The Global Sulfur Cycle Temporal Perspective
  • Isotope ratios help unravel what happened over
    time
  • When ?34S hit near 30 o/oo, pyrite deposition
    must have greatly exceeded sulfide mineral
    oxidation on land
  • Later, during the Carboniferous and Permian, ?34S
    dropped to near 10 o/oo, indicating less
    importance of SO42-, sulfate reduction, and
    pyrite deposition were less important as primary
    production occurred in freshwater swamps
  • (Figures 13.2 and 13.3)

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
The Sulfur Cycle and Acid Rain
  • The current oxidation of S from fossil fuels
    probably represents an unprecedented change in
    global S cycling
  • Fossil fuel combustion
  • SO2 1/2O2 --gt SO3
  • SO3 H2O --gt H2SO4 --gt H SO42-
  • Normal rain pH is 5.6 (in equilibrium with CO2)
  • CO2 H2O --gt H2CO3 lt--gt H HCO3-
  • Acid rain pH can be 4.5 or less

19
Acid Rain - now called Acidic Deposition
  • Agricultural activities (fertilization, manure)
    releases large amounts of NH3 in soils or on
    foliage
  • NH3 H2O ? NH4 OH- (initially basifying)
  • Later acidifying, as discussed above
  • The pH of rainfall in high ammonium areas (e.g.,
    Holland) can be neutral but high levels of
    ammonium can cause extreme acidification
  • Rainfall pH is NOT a good indicator of acidifying
    potential of atmospheric deposition!!!!

20
Acid Rain - now called Acidic Deposition
  • Effects on Soils and Forests
  • Swedish report to the UN in 1971 predicted soil
    Ca loss and forest decline based on correlation
    between exchangeable Ca and volume growth (next
    slide)
  • However, Ca rarely limits forest growth
  • Sulfur rarely limits forest growth
  • Nitrogen usually limits
  • Acidification effect may (or may not) reduce
    growth.

21
(No Transcript)
22
Acidic Deposition
  • How serious is the problem is acid rain in
    forests?
  • Total devegetation and major soil acidification
    near major point-sources of s SO2, such as
    unregulated copper smelting plants at Copper
    Hills, TN, Sudbury, ONT
  • Direct effects of SO2 and sulfuric acid on plants
    not distinguishable from acidification or soil or
    trace metal deposition in such cases

23
Acidic Deposition
  • How serious is the problem is acid rain in
    forests?
  • Could the impacts of high concentration problems
    be extrapolated to chronic, low-concentration
    situations?
  • No. There are effects of high concentration that
    will not be manifest at slow inputs at low
    concentration.
  • Forest growth in Europe was increasing all the
    time there were cries of forest decline!!!
  • Bottom line There was no regional forest decline
    in Europe, therefore acid rain did not harm
    forest growth!

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Acidic Deposition
  • How serious is the problem is acid rain in
    surface waters?
  • Early predictions (e.g., all Adirondack lakes
    dead by 1990) not supported
  • Some acidification in areas with poor buffering
    (Norway, NE US and Canada)
  • Reduced S emissions have NOT led to surface water
    pH increases, but only SO42- increases
  • The lack of recovery in pH is blamed on long-term
    soil acidification - this is possible only if
    soil acidification exactly kept pace with
    reductions in mobile acid anions

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Acidic Deposition
  • Conclusions on Acid Rain
  • Forest Effects not shown, despite fervent beliefs
    by many during the 1980s
  • During the, 1980s when scientists, politicians,
    and the public were very concerned about acid
    rain and forest decline, the overall growth of
    the forests of Europe was increasing at
    unprecedented rates.

30
Acidic Deposition
  • Conclusions on Acid Rain
  • How did our perceptions of forest decline deviate
    so strongly from reality?
  • In part, normal dynamics in forests were suddenly
    thought to be very abnormal
  • Thin canopies are common on suppressed trees, and
    Norway spruce trees apparently experience crown
    thinning as a result of drought or other factors,
    and then recover

31
Acidic Deposition
  • Conclusions on Acid Rain
  • The quick belief in forest decline was a complex
    social phenomenon, and may be explained in part
    by a few key points (see Innes, 1993)
  • Unhealthy trees exist, and it is often difficult
    to assign a cause
  • Greenhouse studies can demonstrate nutritional
    problems that resemble field symptoms
  • Assessments of forest canopy conditions are
    difficult to perform and interpret (most trees
    in a forest look poorer than the dominant trees,
    for example)
  • .

32
Acidic Deposition
  • Conclusions on Acid Rain
  • Perhaps a major contributor to the mismatch
    between perception and reality was largely
    sociological.
  • The risk of a Type II error (failing to believe
    real impacts of pollution) were frightening
  • Some scientists predicted massive growth
    reductions
  • and even deforestation
  • Many people were very upset by such prospects.

33
Carbonyl Sulfide (COS)
  • Potential for effects on global warming
  • Main source of sulfate aerosols in the
    stratosphere
  • The most abundant S gas in the atmosphere
  • Concentrations are increasing (sources greater
    than sinks Vg Table 13.3)
  • Major anthropogenic contribution (?)
  • Fossil fuels 0.02 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Biomass burning 0.07 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Oxidation of CS2 0.18 x 1012 g yr-1
  • Total antropogenic 0.27 x 1012 g yr-1 , or 40
  • Out of 0.68 x 1012 g yr-1 total
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com