Minimal Models for Quantum Decoherence in Coupled Biomolecules - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Minimal Models for Quantum Decoherence in Coupled Biomolecules

Description:

Light harvesting complexes in photosynthesis. Ultraefficient collection & conversion of light ... Photosynthesis. More complex protein models ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: joelgi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Minimal Models for Quantum Decoherence in Coupled Biomolecules


1
Minimal Models forQuantum Decoherence in
Coupled Biomolecules
  • Joel Gilmore
  • Ross H. McKenzie
  • University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Gilmore and McKenzie, J. Phys.Cond. Matt. 17,
1735 (2005) and quant-ph/0412170, to appear in
Chem. Phys. Lett
2
Why should physicists be interested in biology?
Why should biologists be interested in quantum?
  • Quantum mechanics plays a critical role in much
    of biology!

Theyre all highly efficient, highly refined,
self assembling quantum nanoscale devices.
  • Retinal, responsible for vision
  • Ultrafast vision receptor
  • Light harvesting complexes in photosynthesis
  • Ultraefficient collection conversion of light
  • Green Fluorescent Protein
  • Highly efficient marker

3
Biology is hot and wet!
Protein environment
Retinal
Models must include system bath
4
The spin-boson model
  • Popular model for describing decoherence
  • Extensively studies by Leggett, Weiss, Saleur,
    Costi, et al.
  • Applications to SQUIDS, decoherence of qubits
  • Describes the coupling of a two level system to a
    bath of harmonic oscillators
  • Works for many, very different, environments
  • All coupling to enviornment is in the spectral
    density

We can apply this to systems of coupled
biomolecules!
5
Experimental realisation of spin-boson model
What is the two level system?
  • Two molecules
  • Each with two energy levels

If only one excitation is available, effectively
a two level system
6
Experimental realisation of spin-boson model
What is ???the coupling?
  • Excitations may be transferred by dipole-dipole
    interactions
  • Shine in blue, get out yellow!
  • Basis of Fluorescent Resonant Energy Transfer
    (FRET) spectroscopy
  • Used in photosynthesis to move excitations around

7
Experimental realisation of spin-boson model
What is J(????the bath coupling?
  • Use a minimal model to find an analytic
    expression
  • Protein and solvent treated as dielectric mediums

8
Obtaining spectral density, J(?)
  • Central dipole polarises solvent
  • Causes electric reaction field which acts on
    dipole
  • Two sources of dynamics
  • Solvent dipoles fluctuate (captured by
    )
  • Chromophore dipole different in ground and
    excited states
  • To obtain spectral density
  • Quantise reaction field
  • Apply fluctuation-dissipation theorem

9
Spectral density for the minimal model
?? chromophore dipole diff. b protein
radius ?s(?) solvent dielectric constant ?p
protein dielectric constant
  • Ohmic spectral density
  • Cut-off determined by solvent dielectric
    relaxation time, 8ps
  • Microscopic derivation of spin-boson model and
    spectral density
  • Slope is critical parameter
  • For chromophore in water, ???
  • Protein can shield chromophore, so ??????
  • c.f., ???????????for Joesephson Junction qubits
  • Strong decoherence - quantum consciousness
    unlikely!

10
Dynamics of the spin-boson model
  • Usually interested in ?z, which describes
    location of excitation
  • How does the excitation move between molecules?
  • Three possible scenarios for expectation value of
    ?z

Location of excitation with time
  • System is eventually in a mixed state
  • One molecule or the other is definitely excited
  • Here, its most likely the yellow one

11
Dynamics of the spin-boson model
  • Behaviour depends on ? and relative size of
    parameters
  • ?????c
  • ?????
  • kBT????c
  • Rich, non-trivial dynamics
  • Cross-over from coherent-incoherent in many ways

All known in terms of experimental parameters
For identical (???) molecules and ????c
For ????c, coherent oscillations remain even for
high T, ? Bias ??can help or hinder coherent
oscillations
12
Experimental detection of coherent oscillations
  • Under most normal conditions, incoherent
    transfer
  • Good for experimentalists using classical theory!
  • Identical molecules
  • Very close
  • Dipoles unparallel

Seeing coherent oscillations
  • Selectively excite one with polarised laser pulse
  • Measure fluorescence anisotropy as excitation
    moves
  • Each molecule fluoresces different polarisation -
    directly monitor ?z
  • Highly tunable system (T,???????c?
  • Change separation, temperature, solvent, genetic
    engineering

Property Values
? 0-800 meV
? 0-100 meV
h?c 1-10 meV
kBT 1-30 meV
??between 0.01 - 10
13
Key Results Conclusions
  • Demonstrated an experimental realisation of the
    spin-boson model in terms of coupled biomolecules
  • Microscopic derivation of the spectral density
    through minimal models of the surrounding protein
    and solvent
  • Dynamics can be observed directly through
    experiment
  • Model applicable to other scenarios
  • Retinal in vision
  • Photosynthesis
  • More complex protein models
  • Molecular biophysics may be a useful testing
    ground for models of quantum decoherence
  • Complex but tuneable systems - self assembling
    too!
  • It doesnt always have to be physics helping
    advance biology!Sometimes, biology can help
    physics too!

14
Acknowledgements
  • Ross McKenzie (UQ)
  • Paul Meredith (UQ)
  • Ben Powell (UQ)
  • Andrew Briggs all at QIPIRC (Oxford)

Gilmore and McKenzie, J. Phys.Cond. Matt. 17,
1735 (2005) and quant-ph/0412170, to appear in
Chem. Phys. Lett
15
Quantum mechanics in biology
  • Classical biology!
  • Ball and stick models
  • DNA
  • No quantum courses for biologists
  • Quantum biology!
  • Highly efficient photosynthesis
  • Ultrafast vision receptors
  • Tunneling in enzymes
  • Quantum consciousness?!
  • (Okay, probably not)

Quantum or classical -What decides?
16
A Quantum Vision
Rhodopsin undergoes an ultra-fast,
ultra-efficient shape change when it absorbs a
photon. How?
Quantum models, involving conical intersections,
are necessary.
17
Modelling
  • Need to model many atoms
  • At very least, choromophore is QM
  • A number of approaches
  • Direct QM methods (e.g., DFT)
  • QM/MM models (some molecules quantum, some not)
  • Were trying minimal models
  • As simple as possible, but no simpler
  • Capture essential physics, but quick to solve
  • Very valuable in condensed matter (e.g., Kondo
    effect)

18
Model for chromophore and its environment
  • Chromophore properties
  • Two state system
  • Point dipole
  • Protein properties
  • Spherical, radius b
  • Continuous medium
  • Dielectric constant ?p
  • Solvent properties
  • Dielectric constant ?s(?)

19
Model for chromophore and its environment
  • Important physics
  • Water is strongly polar
  • Dipole causes polarised solvent cage
  • Reaction field affects dipole
  • Dynamics
  • Solvent is fluctuating
  • Dielectric relaxation, 8ps
  • Chromophore dipole is different in excited state

20
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com