Quasars and Low Surface Brightness Galaxies as Probes of Dark Matter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Quasars and Low Surface Brightness Galaxies as Probes of Dark Matter

Description:

Low-z galaxy with pairs of high-z quasars (with z1 z2) aligned along minor axis ... explain the long-term optical variability of quasars Hawkins is wrong! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: erikzac
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quasars and Low Surface Brightness Galaxies as Probes of Dark Matter


1
Quasars and Low Surface Brightness Galaxies as
Probes of Dark Matter
Erik Zackrisson
2
Outline
  • Dark matter
  • Dark matter halos
  • Baryonic and non-baryonic dark matter
  • Cold dark matter
  • Quasars
  • Gravitational lensing
  • Redshift
  • Low Surface Brightness Galaxies
  • Rotation curves
  • Summary of Results

3
Dark Matter
Dark matter
Luminous matter
4
First detection of dark matter
  • Fritz Zwicky (1933) Dark matter in the Coma
    Cluster

5
The Dark Matter Problem
2 (Luminous)
98 (Dark)
6
Dark Matter Halos I
Galaxy ? Stars Gas Dust Supermassive Black
Hole Dark Matter
7
Dark Matter Halos II
Luminous galaxy
Dark halo
8
Baryonic Non-Baryonic Dark Matter
  • Baryonic matter 15
  • Example Stars, gas clouds, planets
  • Missing 35
  • Non-baryonic matter 85
  • Example Axions, neutralinos,
  • primordial black holes
  • Missing 100
  • Best model Cold Dark Matter (CDM)

9
Cold dark matter and the evolution of structure
10
Cold dark matter and the evolution of structure
II
11
Cold Dark Matter Halos
Central density cusp predicted by cold dark
matter
R
Observed
Density
R
Dark matter halo
12
Quasars
13
(No Transcript)
14
Gravitational lensing
15
Gravitational lensing II
16
Microlensing Made Simple
Obs! Fel bild!
17
Microlensing Made Simple II
18
Claim The long-term optical variability of
quasars is quased by microlensing
Hawkins, M.R.S. (1993, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003)
19
The dark matter puzzle solved?
  • Mcompact ?10-3 Msolar
  • Almost all of the dark matter in this form
  • Primordial black holes?

20
Expansion of the Universe
21
Redshifts
High z ? Large distance Low z ? Small distance
22
Claims of non-cosmological redshifts
z1
z2
Low-z galaxy with pairs of high-z quasars (with
z1?z2) aligned along minor axis
Low-z galaxy surrounded by overdensity of high-z
quasars
23
Ejection scenarios
?
?
?
New galaxy (?), very low redshift (z1)
?
?
Bright quasar, low redshift (gtz1)
Faint quasar, high redshift (gtgtz1)
Local galaxy, very low redshift (z1)
24
Low Surface Brightness Galaxies
Examples of Target Galaxies
The Very Large Telescope
25
The Central Mass Budget
Low Surface Brightness Galaxies
High Surface Brightness Galaxies
Dark matter
Luminous matter
Dark matter
Luminous matter
26
Rotation Curves
CDM prediction
Vrot
Density
Observed
Radius
Radius
Spectroscopy ? Rotation Curve ? Density
Profile
27
Results
  • Paper I
  • Uncertainties in the typical quasar size ? Quasar
    variability cannot easily be used to constrain
    dark matter at the current time
  • Paper II
  • Microlensing cannot explain the long-term optical
    variability of quasars Hawkins is wrong!
  • Paper III
  • Non-cosmological redshift scenarios involving
    quasar ejection can be tested with observations
    of quasar host galaxies made a small telescope

28
Results II
  • Paper IV
  • The bluest low surface brightness galaxies can be
    used to test hierarchical galaxy formation models
    provided that we can derive their ages
  • The star formation rate of the bluest low surface
    brightness galaxies cannot have been constant or
    increasing unless the stellar initial mass
    function is unusual
  • Paper V
  • The density profiles of the dark halos
    surrounding the bluest low surface brightness
    galaxies are in conflict with the Cold Dark
    Matter predictions

29
Errata
  • Spikblad Polhemssalen ? Polhemsalen
  • Page v optical long-term ? long-term optical
  • Page 3 as the ray crossed ? as its ray grazed
  • Page 24 (twice) reflectance ? reflection
  • Page 33 z ? 23 ? z ? 24
  • Page 35 the latter variations ? these variations
  • Page 35 hoever are ? are however
  • Page 37 by fast rise ? by a fast rise
  • Page 44 10121014 m ? 10123?1013 m
  • Page 56 disk by ? disk is given by
  • Page 69 ett par procent ? några få procent
  • Page 69 välkända astronomiska objekt ? välkända
    typer av astronomiska objekt
  • Page 69 både vår och andra ? både vår egen och
    andra
  • Paper I, page 26, column 2, paragraph 1 higher
    angular size distance ? higher light travel time
    distance
  • Paper V, page 8 Division line should not be
    dashed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com