Review Part 6 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Review Part 6

Description:

1) Which of the following historical events advanced the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment? ... d. Bethel v. Frasier. e. Cleveland Board of Education v. Lafleur ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: kennethm9
Category:
Tags: bethel | part | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review Part 6


1
  • Review Part 6
  • Civil Rights
  • Equal Protection Under the Law

2
  • 1) Which of the following historical events
    advanced the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment?
  • a. Jim Crow Laws
  • b. Black codes
  • c. Grandfather voting laws
  • d. Literacy voting tests
  • e. Civil rights acts

3
  • 1) Which of the following historical events
    advanced the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment?
  • a. Jim Crow Laws
  • b. Black codes
  • c. Grandfather voting laws
  • d. Literacy voting tests
  • e. Civil rights acts

4
  • 2) Which of the following judicial principles
    reduced the impact of the Fourteenth Amendment?
  • a. Separate but equal
  • b. All deliberate speed
  • c. Equal protection under the law
  • d. Privileges and immunities of people
  • e. Habeas corpus

5
  • 2) Which of the following judicial principles
    reduced the impact of the Fourteenth Amendment?
  • a. Separate but equal
  • b. All deliberate speed
  • c. Equal protection under the law
  • d. Privileges and immunities of people
  • e. Habeas corpus

6
  • 3) Which of the following doctrines made the
    Bill of Rights applicable to the states?
  • a. Incorporation principles
  • b. Clear and present danger
  • c. Separation of powers
  • d. The reserved power clause
  • e. The elastic clause

7
  • 3) Which of the following doctrines made the
    Bill of Rights applicable to the states?
  • a. Incorporation principles
  • b. Clear and present danger
  • c. Separation of powers
  • d. The reserved power clause
  • e. The elastic clause

8
  • Explanation
  • The incorporation or nationalization of the Bill
    of Rights began with civil liberty cases in the
    early part of the twentieth century. It was not
    until the Brown case that this principle began to
    apply fully to civil rights cases. Clear and
    present danger came from the Schenk case.
    Separation of powers, the reserved power clause,
    and the elastic clause are all constitutional
    principles

9
  • 4) All the following criteria were used to
    establish the nationalization of the Fourteenth
    Amendment EXCEPT
  • a. Reasonable classification of race
  • b. The national basis test
  • c. The strict scrutiny test
  • d. The suspect class test
  • e. The police power of states

10
  • 4) All the following criteria were used to
    establish the nationalization of the Fourteenth
    Amendment EXCEPT
  • a. Reasonable classification of race
  • b. The national basis test
  • c. The strict scrutiny test
  • d. The suspect class test
  • e. The police power of states

11
  • Explanation
  • A compelling interest of the state such as the
    police power tends to weaken the doctrine of
    nationalization of the Bill of Rights. A major
    characteristic of incorporation stems from the
    phrase No State shall deprive persons Choices
    A through D are all tests the courts apply to
    equal protection cases

12
  • 5) Which of the following represents a legal
    difference between de facto and de jure
    segregation?
  • a. De facto segregation has been made legal
  • b. De jure segregation is legal
  • c. De jure segregation is illegal based on
    Supreme Court decisions
  • d. De facto segregation is supported by real
    estate agents
  • e. De jure segregation was overturned by the
    Plessy v. Ferguson decision

13
  • 5) Which of the following represents a legal
    difference between de facto and de jure
    segregation?
  • a. De facto segregation has been made legal
  • b. De jure segregation is legal
  • c. De jure segregation is illegal based on
    Supreme Court decisions
  • d. De facto segregation is supported by real
    estate agents
  • e. De jure segregation was overturned by the
    Plessy v. Ferguson decision

14
  • Explanation
  • By definition, de jure segregation is by law and
    de facto segregation is by fact or circumstance.
    After the Brown decision, de jure segregation was
    illegal. Choice D may happen, but if it can be
    proven, it would be just as illegal as de jure
    segregation.

15
  • 6) Which of the following constitutional
    provisions has been used to strike down
    discrimination in public accommodations?
  • a. Tenth Amendments reserved power clause
  • b. Article I Section Is commerce clause
  • c. First Amendments right to assemble
  • d. Affirmative action laws
  • e. Fifteenth Amendments suffrage clause

16
  • 6) Which of the following constitutional
    provisions has been used to strike down
    discrimination in public accommodations?
  • a. Tenth Amendments reserved power clause
  • b. Article I Section Is commerce clause
  • c. First Amendments right to assemble
  • d. Affirmative action laws
  • e. Fifteenth Amendments suffrage clause

17
  • 7) A major impact of the Bakke decision was that
  • a. Racial quotas were legal
  • b. Racial preferences for minority groups were
    illegal
  • c. Reverse discrimination based on quotas was
    legal
  • d. Affirmative action programs sponsored by the
    government were illegal
  • e. Affirmative action programs sponsored by the
    states were illegal

18
  • 7) A major impact of the Bakke decision was that
  • a. Racial quotas were legal
  • b. Racial preferences for minority groups were
    illegal
  • c. Reverse discrimination based on quotas was
    legal
  • d. Affirmative action programs sponsored by the
    government were illegal
  • e. Affirmative action programs sponsored by the
    states were illegal

19
  • Explanation
  • The Bakke decision had two major components. The
    first answered the question posed by Bakke.
    Could he be denied admission to Davis Medical
    School because of a quota? The Court, using the
    equal protection clause of the Fourteenth
    Amendment, said that quotas were illegal.
    However, the Court also ruled that racial
    preferences could be used as part of an overall
    plan when it came to schools or work.

20
  • 8) All the following criteria represent
    procedures used for evaluating the legitimacy of
    affirmative action programs EXCEPT
  • a. A scrutiny test based on racial
    classification
  • b. Affirmative action programs based strictly on
    quotas
  • c. States taking action based on evidence that
    past discriminatory practice existed
  • d. Affirmative action remedies must be based on
    specific remedies
  • e. affirmative action programs must be based on
    narrowly tailored principles

21
  • 8) All the following criteria represent
    procedures used for evaluating the legitimacy of
    affirmative action programs EXCEPT
  • a. A scrutiny test based on racial
    classification
  • b. Affirmative action programs based strictly on
    quotas
  • c. States taking action based on evidence that
    past discriminatory practice existed
  • d. Affirmative action remedies must be based on
    specific remedies
  • e. affirmative action programs must be based on
    narrowly tailored principles

22
  • 9) The history of mankind is a history of
    repeated injuries and usurpations in the past
    of man toward women.
  • Which of the following documents contained this
    passage?
  • a. Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions
  • b. Equal Rights Amendment
  • c. Seventeenth Amendment
  • d. The Feminine Mystique
  • e. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

23
  • 9) The history of mankind is a history of
    repeated injuries and usurpations in the past
    of man toward women.
  • Which of the following documents contained this
    passage?
  • a. Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions
  • b. Equal Rights Amendment
  • c. Seventeenth Amendment
  • d. The Feminine Mystique
  • e. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

24
  • 10) Which of the following furthered the cause
    of civil rights for women?
  • I. The Brandeis Brief submitted in the case of
    Muller v. Oregon
  • II. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • III. Decisions of the Court regarding the issue
    of comparable worth
  • IV. Medium scrutiny standards established in
    judicial decisions
  • a. I only d. I, II, and III only
  • b. II only e. II, III, and IV only
  • c. II and III only

25
  • 10) Which of the following furthered the cause
    of civil rights for women?
  • I. The Brandeis Brief submitted in the case of
    Muller v. Oregon
  • II. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • III. Decisions of the Court regarding the issue
    of comparable worth
  • IV. Medium scrutiny standards established in
    judicial decisions
  • a. I only d. I, II, and III only
  • b. II only e. II, III, and IV only
  • c. II and III only

26
  • Explanation
  • The Brandeis Brief made the argument that there
    were inherent differences between men and women
    and convinced the Supreme Court to rule against
    the owner of a Laundromat who wanted a woman
    employee to be able to work beyond the legal
    limit set by the state of Oregon. Statements II,
    III and IV contribute to civil rights for women.
    Title VII applied to the workplace. Comparable
    worth deals with equal pay, and medium scrutiny
    is a standard used by the Court to evaluate equal
    protection issues.

27
  • 11) Which of the following cases helped further
    civil rights for students?
  • a. Tinker v. Des Moines
  • b. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeir
  • c. New Jersey v. TLO
  • d. Bethel v. Frasier
  • e. Cleveland Board of Education v. Lafleur

28
  • 11) Which of the following cases helped further
    civil rights for students?
  • a. Tinker v. Des Moines
  • b. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeir
  • c. New Jersey v. TLO
  • d. Bethel v. Frasier
  • e. Cleveland Board of Education v. Lafleur

29
  • Explanation
  • Even though choices B, C and D all deal with
    students, the outcome and significance of those
    cases weakened the doctrine established in Tinker
    that student rights are not shed at the
    schoolhouse gates.

30
  • 12) Discrimination in the workplace has been
    made illegal by all the following EXCEPT
  • a. Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • b. Supreme Court decision in Craig v. Boren
  • c. Supreme Court decision in Dothard v.
    Rawlinson
  • d. Supreme Court decision in UAW v. Johnson
  • e. Passage of Proposition 187

31
  • 12) Discrimination in the workplace has been
    made illegal by all the following EXCEPT
  • a. Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • b. Supreme Court decision in Craig v. Boren
  • c. Supreme Court decision in Dothard v.
    Rawlinson
  • d. Supreme Court decision in UAW v. Johnson
  • e. Passage of Proposition 187

32
  • Explanation
  • This question requires a knowledge of the
    decisions made in specific cases as well as the
    content of the Civil Rights Act and Proposition
    187. Proposition 187, a voter initiative, took
    away state social services for illegal aliens in
    California.

33
  • The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com