PET Count - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

PET Count

Description:

Previous studies of word identification have found that the contribution of ... Radiotracer administration was intravenous bolus injection of 10 mCi of H215O. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: wythew2
Category:
Tags: pet | bolus | count

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PET Count


1
Lexical and Sublexical Components of Age-Related
Changes in Neural Activation During Visual Word
Identification
Whiting, W.L., Madden, D.J., Langley, L.K.,
Denny, L.L., Turkington, T.G., Provenzale, J.M.,
Hawk, T.C., Coleman, R.E. Center for the Study
of Aging and Human Development, and Departments
of Psychiatry and Radiology Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
Word Frequency Activation Effects
Introduction
  • Word frequency had a larger effect on RT than
    length for both younger (? -.497,R2 .168 vs.
    ? .101, R2 .007) and older adults (?
    -.457, R2 .146 vs. ? .241, R2 .041) .
  • To determine whether the pattern of frequency and
    length effects was statistically different for
    younger and older adults, we used frequency and
    length values to predict RTs for each
    participant. Each participants frequency and
    length coefficient was submitted to an Age x
    Predictor ANOVA.

Striate Cortex
Inferior Temporal Gyrus
Previous studies of word identification have
found that the contribution of lexical/semantic
and sublexical/nonsemantic processing to word
identification is different for younger and older
adults (e.g., Allen et al., 1991 Spieler
Balota, 2000). Spieler and Balota, like others,
found that the more frequently a word appears in
printed text, the more rapidly both younger and
older adults were able to name words. However,
this lexical variable (word frequency) accounted
for a greater proportion of variance in older
adults naming latencies relative to younger
adults. This finding along with other findings
of equivalent word frequency effects for younger
and older adults during word identification
provides evidence of preserved semantic
processing with age. There is also evidence to
suggest that the relationship between sublexical
word properties (e.g., word length) and word
identification RT also varies with age (Allen et
al.). The goal of the present study was to
determine whether age differences in the effects
of lexical and sublexical processes on word
identification might reflect different patterns
of neural activation. Madden et al. (in press)
previously examined the relationship between word
identification RT and activation, but found no
age differences in the correlation between these
two variables. The present study reexamined the
Madden et al. data to see if age differences in
the relationship between RT and activation might
be mediated by lexical and sublexical word
properties.
Word Frequency Coefficient
Younger Adults
1
0.30
Word Frequency Coefficient
Older Adults
Younger
-.263
-.249
0.20
Older
Regression Coefficient
PET Count
PET Count
  • Word Frequency effects (coefficients) were
    reliably related to activation in both the
    striate and ITG for older adults only.
  • For older adults, greater activation in both the
    striate and ITG was associated with larger
    effects of frequency on lexical decision RT
    (i.e., larger frequency coefficients).

0.10
.133
.050
0
Word Frequency
Word Length
Word Length Activation Effects
  • As shown above in Figure 1, although word
    frequency coefficients were similar for older and
    younger adults, word length had a larger effect
    on older adults lexical decision RTs relative to
    younger adults.

Striate Cortex
Inferior Temporal Gyrus
Method
  • Participants
  • 12 younger adults (M 23.6 yrs, range 20-29 yrs)
    and 12 older adults (M 65.0 yrs, range 62-70
    yrs).
  • Design and Procedure
  • Word Identification task
  • A standard yes/no lexical decision task during
    each trial block, participants were randomly
    presented with either words (e.g., FOREST) or
    pronounceable nonwords (e.g., TWEAL).
  • On a single trial, participants pressed one of
    two buttons on a response box to indicate whether
    the letter string was a word or nonword.
  • Participants performed 9 blocks of trials
    containing a total of 720 words and nonwords.
  • Words Ranged in Frequency from 20 to 65 SFI and 4
    to 10 letters in length within each block.
  • Baseline task
  • For the baseline/subtraction task, participants
    searched letter strings of Ts and Zs in
    search of a lower case c (e.g., TZTZTZcT) and
    pressed one of two buttons to indicate the
    presence or absence of a c.
  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
  • Measurement of regional cerebral blood flow
    (rCBF) was conducted with a GE Advance whole-body
    PET scanner (35 imaging planes separated by 4.25
    mm). Intrinsic in-plane and axial spatial
    resolutions were approximately 5 mm.
  • Radiotracer administration was intravenous bolus
    injection of 10 mCi of H215O. Data acquisition
    was performed in the 3D mode (septa out). Each
    task condition was performed during a separate
    PET scan. There was a total of 12 emission scans,
    three scans for each of four task conditions (1
    baseline, 3 lexical decision).

Younger Adults
Activation Results
Word Length Coefficient
  • We next examined whether activation in Madden et
    al. might be related to these lexical and
    sublexical variables.
  • Madden et al. found that, relative to the
    baseline search task, word identification was
    associated with greater activation of the
    inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) for older adults,
    but greater visual striate activation for younger
    adults (see Figure 2 below). Our analyses focused
    on these 2 areas of activation.
  • We simultaneously regressed activation (PET
    counts) in these 2 areas onto word frequency and
    length coefficients in separate analyses for each
    lexical/sublexical variable and age group (see
    Figures 3 4).

Older Adults
Word Length Coefficient
PET Count
PET Count
  • Word Length effects (coefficients) were reliably
    related to activation only in the striate cortex
    of older adults.
  • For older adults, lower activation in the striate
    was associated with larger effects of length on
    lexical decision RT.

Older Adults
2
Younger Adults
Conclusions
  • For older adults, greater activation in the
    striate and ITG was associated with less
    efficient lexical (word frequency) processing, as
    those with larger coefficients had slower RTs.
  • The opposite effect was found for word length
    lower striate activation was associated with less
    efficient sublexical/perceptual (word length)
    processing.
  • This pattern of effects may indicate that older
    adults compensate for early visual processing
    deficiencies during word identification by
    engaging in more semantic processing hosted by
    the inferior temporal gyrus.

Behavioral Results
  • In the first analysis, lexical decision RTs were
    averaged across participants to obtain mean RTs
    for each of the 720 stimulus words. Word
    frequency and length were then regressed onto RT.
  • For both age groups, word frequency coefficients
    were negative indicating that more familiar words
    were identified more quickly. Word length
    coefficients were positive reflecting slower
    responses to longer length words.

References Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J.,
Crozier, L. C. (1991). Adult age differences in
letter-level and word-level processing.
Psychology and Aging, 6, 261-271. Madden, D. J.,
Langley, L. K., Denny, L. L., Turkington, T. G.,
Provenzale, J. M., Hawk, T. C., et al. (in
press). Adult age differences in visual word
identification Functional neuroanatomy by
positron emission tomography. Brain Cognition.
Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A. (2000). Factors
influencing word naming in younger and older
adults. Psychology and Aging, 15,
225-231. Acknowledgements This work was supported
by National Institute on Aging grants T32
AG00029-26 and R01 AG11622.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com