Discussion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Discussion

Description:

A truncated AUC' analysis (30 to 120 minute sample time window) showed a highly ... slurry and then brushed their buccal tooth surfaces for the remainder of the time. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: aquafreshs
Category:
Tags: discussion

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Discussion


1
78. Effect of brushing time and dentifrice dose
on orally retained fluoride in vivo JE
Creetha, DT Zerob, ML Bosmaa, A Butlera, RG
Guiberta, R Karwala, RJM Lyncha, M Northa, EA
Martinez-Mierb, C González-Cabezasb, SA
Kellyb a GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare,
St Georges Avenue, Weybridge, UK b Oral
Health Research Institute, Indiana University,
Indiana, USA.
  • Overview
  • This study shows that increasing brushing time
    and paste quantity increases the post-brushing
    reservoir of fluoride retained on the oral
    surfaces, indicating that these elements of
    brushing behaviour have the potential to
    influence the caries protection from fluoride.
  • Introduction
  • Creating a fluoride reservoir in the oral cavity
    (bound fluoride) is critical to its full
    caries-protective effect. Fluoride can promote
    remineralisation of early carious lesions in
    saliva, even at very low concentrations such as
    those found over the extended period after use of
    fluoridated dentifrices or mouthrinses1.
  • To create an effective oral reservoir of
    fluoride post-brushing, brushing behaviour is
    important i.e. enough dentifrice must be used
    for enough time to deliver enough fluoride to the
    oral surfaces to exert an anticaries effect.
    Furthermore, this F- should not be removed by
    excessive rinsing after brushing. However, the
    effect of brushing time and paste quantity on
    fluoride concentration in saliva post-brushing
    has not been well-studied.
  • The aim of this work was therefore to measure
  • the effect of brushing time (30 seconds to 3
    minutes)
  • the amount of dentifrice used (1.5 g or 0.5 g)
  • on F- delivery to the oral cavity and
    post-brushing F- concentration in saliva.
  • Data are presented on the effects of these
    behaviours on F- bound within the oral cavity
    after brushing, rather than merely dissolved in
    oral fluids, and include an exploratory analysis
    using a bi-phasic clearance model.
  • Methods
  • A randomized, single-centre, single-product,
    multi-use, six way crossover clinical study was
    performed involving 57 healthy subjects, aged
    25-65. The study measured F- delivery to the oral
    cavity and F- concentration in saliva over 2
    hours post-brushing, after different brushing
    regimens. This study also measured
    remineralisation of enamel in situ over the
    4-hour period post-brushing (results reported
    separately) so subjects wore an intra-oral
    appliance during the course of the experiment2.
  • After a 2-day lead-in period on non-F-
    dentifrice, subjects brushed with an Aquafresh
    Flex soft, flat-trim toothbrush and Aquafresh
    Advanced dentifrice (1100 ppm F- as NaF). On
    separate occasions subjects brushed for 30, 45,
    60, 120 or 180 seconds with 1.5 g ( 0.05 g)
    dentifrice, or for 60 seconds with 0.5 g ( 0.05
    g) dentifrice.
  • For each regime, subjects first brushed their
    occlusal tooth surfaces for 12 s to create a
    dentifrice slurry and then brushed their buccal
    tooth surfaces for the remainder of the time.
    For the 120 s and 180 s brushings only, subjects
    were allowed to expectorate within the brushing
    period. After brushing, subjects expectorated
    dentifrice slurry and then immediately rinsed
    with 10 mL of deionized water for 10 s.
    Unstimulated saliva samples were collected over 5
    min periods, starting at pre-brushing, 5 min ( 1
    min), 15 min ( 1 min), 30 min ( 1 min), 60 min
    ( 5 min) and 120 min ( 5 min) post-brushing.
    The concentration of fluoride was measured in all
    saliva samples, expectorate, rinse and toothbrush
    washings. Analysis of F- in saliva was conducted
    using a modification of the hexamethyldisiloxane
    (HMDS,) microdiffusion method3 as modified by
    Martinez-Mier et al.4
  • The data were fitted to a bi-exponential
    equation, assuming two first-order F clearance
    processes, one rapid (unbound F), and one slow
    (bound F), in which bound F releases into
    unbound F5
  • Fs A ? e-at B ? e-ßt (Eqn. 1)
  • . where Fs is the concentration of F- in saliva
    at time t, and A and B represent the amount of F-
    initially bound (t0) in the rapid and slow
    clearance reservoirs respectively. The results
    were compared with a less-sophisticated estimate
    of bound F- achieved by summing areas of trapezia
    defined by the saliva clearance data between 30
    and 120 minutes post-brushing (AUC30-120min).

Figure 2. Effect of brushing time and dentifrice
quantity on AUC, calculated using the trapezium
method, between 30-120 min post-brushing (mean
s.e.)
Figure 3. Effect of brushing time and dentifrice
quantity on orally bound F-, (i.e. the B
parameter from the bi-exponential Eqn. 1)
Figure 1. Effect of brushing time and dentifrice
quantity on salivary F- concentration after
brushing (mean s.e.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com