Regional Approaches to Economic Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Regional Approaches to Economic Development

Description:

Promote sound policy for state and local governments through factual, objective research ... publications, please visit: www.crcmich.org. Bettie Buss bbuss_at_crcmich.org ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: johnka4
Learn more at: http://crcmich.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regional Approaches to Economic Development


1
(No Transcript)
2
Regional Approaches to Economic Development
  • A Presentation by Citizens Research Council of
    Michigan

3
Who We Are
  • Founded in 1916
  • Statewide
  • Nonpartisan
  • Private not-for-profit
  • Promote sound policy for state and local
    governments through factual, objective research
  • Rely on charitable contributions of Michigan
    businesses, foundations, and individuals

4
All CRC reports are available online at
www.crcmich.org
  • Survey of Economic Development Programs in
    Michigan, Report No. 347
  • Regional Approaches to Economic Development,
    Report No. 345

5
Goals of this Project
  • To test the assertion that regions are a logical
    basis for economic development.
  • To understand how regional players coalesce
    around economic development structures and
    strategies.
  • To develop recommendations for improved
    approaches to economic development in Michigan.

6
The New Reality Creative Destruction
  • Globalization and the diffusion of knowledge,
    capital, and technology
  • Technology based productivity
  • Product specialization
  • International uncertainty and volatile gasoline
    prices
  • Delegation of responsibility for economic
    development to states and sub-state units
  • Rise of site consultants who broker between firms
    and governments
  • Preeminence of labor markets, not political
    boundaries

7
The Other Reality
  • Fragmented government (83 counties, 1,241
    townships,274 cities, 261 villages) and strong
    local control
  • Few incentives for regional cooperation, very
    limited tax base sharing
  • Competing definitions of economic development
  • Expectations built on a 20th Century
    manufacturing model
  • Michigans economy

8
Michigans Economy in 2006
  • GDP grew in every state except Michigan (-0.5
    compared to 3.4 for the U.S. as a whole).
  • Michigan ranked 50th of 50 states in state
    personal income growth (3.1 compared to 6.3 for
    the U.S. as a whole).
  • Michigan ranked 49th of 50 states in per capita
    personal income growth (3.2 compared to 5.2
    nationwide).
  • Michigan ranked 48th out of 50 states in
    population growth (-0.1 compared to 1).
  • Unemployment is 7.2...lowest number of people
    working in Mi since 1995

9
The Threat of the Old Reality
  • Institutional sclerosis (Mancur Olson)
  • A term used to describe a process of regional
    decline in which places that prospered greatly in
    one era find it difficult or impossible to adopt
    new organizational and cultural patterns, no
    matter how beneficial they may be.
  • Innovation and growth shift to new locations.

10
The Importance of Regions
  • Economic activity is defined by labor markets
    the cost and availability of different kinds of
    labor determines the attractiveness of the region
    for different kinds of businesses and different
    kinds of households.
  • Regions that can attract talented residents and
    support innovative firms will prosper.

11
Strategic Foundations of Economic Development
Are Not Defined by Political Boundaries
  • Human capital
  • Research and development institutions
  • Financial capital
  • Industrial base
  • Physical infrastructure
  • Entrepreneurial environment
  • Legal and regulatory environment
  • Quality of life

12
A Paradox
  • The major forces that constrain or stimulate
    development are regional (real estate and labor
    markets, transportation systems, business and
    union environment, natural resources, industry
    clusters).
  • Most of the instruments of managing development
    are local (local tax structures, land use
    regulations, capital improvement programs).

13
Problematic Outcomes
  • In a review of nationwide results, Timothy Bartik
    found that 80 percent of net new jobs created by
    incentives go to non-residents rather than to
    residents.
  • Redistribution of public expenditures and tax
    burden to favor business over residents.
  • Incentive competition skews the mix of public
    services.
  • Waste of public resources.

14
Multiple Approaches Invest in People, or Place,
or Firms
  • Retain and protect jobs through business
    retention
  • Create better jobs by raising educational levels
  • Create higher paying jobs through union
    contracts, living wage ordinances
  • Increase tax base though business attraction
  • Increase diversification through entrepreneurism,
    university tech transfer, venture capital
  • Increase productivity through innovation and
    capital investment
  • Increase profits by reducing tax rates
  • Revitalize a geographic area through public
    investment in infrastructure
  • Increase population by creating jobs
  • Change the local context

15
Organizational Structure of Economic Development
in MI
  • MEDC and various state departments
  • Counties, cities, villages, and townships
  • DDAs and other special authorities
  • Chambers of commerce
  • Specialized membership organizations
  • Councils of government and metropolitan planning
    organizations
  • Workforce Development Boards
  • Utility companies and banks
  • Consultants and developers
  • Education community
  • Foundations
  • Others

16
The Importance of Foundations in Economic
Development
  • Not constrained by political boundaries
  • Not constrained by election cycles
  • Can assemble all of the appropriate participants
  • Can incentivize local officials to do what does
    not come naturally
  • Can mediate competing goals and approaches
  • Can change local context

17
Nationwide Survey of Regional Organizations
  • 50 useable responses
  • Each type of organization has a perspective that
    reflects its constituents and influences its
    goals and programs.
  • Most of the organizations have other
    responsibilities.

18
Regional Economic Development Organization
Responses
Chamber 501(6) 501(3) COG
Michigan 2 1 2 2
Midwest 7 5 3 -
Northeast - 5 2 1
Southeast 1 5 2 1
West 1 6 3 1
19
The Region Served
  • Parts of 2 or more states 9
  • Multiple counties in a single state
    27
  • Multiple sub-county level governments 14
  • Urban 11 Mid-sized city 9
  • Large city 8 Small city 6
  • Suburban 4 Rural 12

20
The Service Area
  • Voluntary agreement of member communities
  • Adoption of federal or state designation (MSA)
  • Actions of the founders
  • Determination of the board of directors
  • Interlocal contracts
  • State designations

21
Role of the Regional Organization
  • Only 3 of 50 did not share the service area with
    other local or regional entities.
  • Coordination with other entities included serving
    on each others committees and boards, forums and
    meetings, formal memorandums of understanding and
    contracts.
  • Some regional organizations focus on
    international or national attraction, industrial
    and manufacturing, headquarters, or specific
    projects, while locals focus on retention and
    retail. Some provide data and issues analysis.
    Some perform all economic development for the
    region.

22
Common Functions and Services
  • Coordinating strategic approaches
  • Creating E.D. plans
  • Researching, reporting of E.D. data
  • Business attraction
  • Advice to local governments to improve
    competitiveness
  • Inventory of available sites
  • Involvement in mass transit and infrastructure
    issues
  • Branding, image campaigns
  • Assisting businesses with local government
    requirements

23
Less Common Functions
  • Advocacy and lobbying
  • Business retention
  • Trade missions
  • Member services
  • Involvement in quality of life issues
  • Low interest loans, gap financing, equity
    investing, venture capital
  • Workforce training
  • Industrial park
  • Site acquisition and preparation
  • Export development
  • Business-to-business trade shows

24
Identified Strengths-All
  • Skilled/productive workforce 31
  • Industrial/business base 19
  • Location/proximity to markets 17
  • Knowledge/education assets 11
  • Business climate 9
  • Business costs 8
  • Quality of life 8
  • Transportation infrastructure 8

25
Identified Strengths-Michigan
  • Industrial/business base 6
  • Skilled/productive workforce 5
  • Business climate 4
  • Knowledge/education assets 2

26
Identified Problems-All
  • Industrial decline or restructuring 14
  • Lack skilled workforce, need retraining 12
  • Lack transportation infrastructure 12
  • Image 9
  • Educational attainment or outcomes 7
  • Infrastructure investment 7
  • Loss of population or talent 7
  • Limited land or buildings 6

27
Identified Problems-Michigan
  • Industrial decline/restructuring 7
  • Image 3
  • Loss of population or talent 2
  • Union attitude/perception, high wages 2

28
Targeted Industry Clusters
  • Advanced manufacturing
  • Advanced materials
  • Alternative energy
  • Automotive/transportation research and
    development
  • Aviation and aerospace
  • Business and financial services
  • Chemicals
  • Corporate headquarters
  • Creative
  • Distribution and logistics
  • Engineering and management services
  • Film and television

29
Targeted Industry Clusters
  • Finance and insurance
  • Health care
  • Information technology
  • Life sciences/bioscience
  • Machinery, metal, and instruments
  • Medical and pharmaceutical
  • Nanotechnology
  • Printing and publishing
  • Software
  • Technology
  • Warehouse operations
  • Wholesale trade

30
Shared Regional Vision and Plan
Have a Shared Plan Plan in Process No Plan
Chambers 8 1 2
Member Orgs. 14 4 4
501(c)(3) 6 3 3
COGs 3 1 1
31
Operating Revenues
Av. Op. Budget Govt. Source Private Mmbrs Earned Income Found-ations
C of Cs 3.4m 12 74 12 2
Mmbr. Orgs. 1.9m 35 49 9 6
501c3 3.0m 41 26 11 17
COGs 3.8m 83 -- 7 1
32
Average of Board Members from Various Sectors
Govt For -Profit Non - Profit Higher Ed C. C. or Wkfrc Union
CofC 3.8 25.2 4.6 1.4 0.4 0.2
Mmbr 6.6 27.5 3.3 1.7 0.7 0.3
501c3 9.7 17.2 4.9 1.3 0.7 0.3
COG 30.8 2.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.0
33
Growth in the Past Five Years
Increased Stayed the Same Decreased
Michigan 3 2 2
Midwest (excl MI) 10 5 -
Northeast 4 2 2
Southeast 6 2 1
West 8 2 1
34
The North Carolina Model
  • 100 counties organized into 7 regional
    public-private partnerships to maximize
    collaboration
  • Regional entities work with local and state
    economic development agencies, corporate allies,
    funders
  • Purpose Enable regions to compete effectively
    for new investment and to devise effective
    economic develop-ment strategies based on
    regional opportunities and advantages
  • Approach Develop integrated economic and
    workforce development strategy market the
    region provide data and information provide
    financial assistance, training and access to
    technology to counties create special purpose
    commissions and councils spearhead regional
    initiatives

35
Lessons
  • Economic development is being organized on
    regional bases in Michigan and in every part of
    the country.
  • The process of identifying regional boundaries is
    generally ad hoc, imprecise, and variable, but
    North Carolina has assigned all counties into one
    of seven regions.
  • Where there is a regional economic development
    entity, there is usually a regionally shared
    vision and plan.

36
Lessons
  • Organizations priorities and goals reflect their
    membership.
  • Layering and overlapping of economic development
    efforts is the norm.
  • Most regional organizations have increased in
    size over the past five years.
  • States, regions, counties, cities, chambers of
    commerce, and other organizations are competing
    for a limited number of target industries.

37
Lessons
  • Success reflected the number of full-time staff
    devoted to economic development.

38
Recommendations
  • Consider expanding the use of regional
    public-private partnerships for reinforcing and
    resourcing economic development.
  • Build on existing regional structures where
    possible, create new structures where necessary.
  • Adopt strategic economic development goals for
    the state and regions and publish semiannual
    reports on progress toward meeting goals and on
    best practices.

39
The Role of Regional Economic Development
Partnerships
  • Bring together public and private actors foster
    business, government, education and foundation
    collaboration.
  • Emphasize the diverse characteristics of
    Michigans regions and coordinate the development
    of a regional strategy based on regional goals
    and assets.
  • Market the regions assets and sites and refer
    developers to county or local ED departments as
    appropriate.
  • Assist economic development professionals in
    obtaining specialized training and technology as
    needed.
  • Maintain a regional data base of available sites.
  • Advocate for the region and lobby for statutory
    or regulatory changes.
  • Raise public and private funds to support
    operations.
  • Assess the success of various regional
    strategies.

40
The State Role in a Regional Model
  • Define logical regional boundaries that build on
    existing initiatives.
  • Initiate and/or support a public-private
    partnership in each region.
  • Support the development of regionally relevant ED
    strategies.
  • Coordinate state ED efforts with regional plans.
  • Provide data, share best practices.

41
The County and Local Role in a Regional Model
  • Participate in regional partnerships.
  • Assist in defining a regional strategy based on
    regional assets and values.
  • Support regional efforts.
  • Align local strategies to support the regional
    plan.
  • Share information and best practices.
  • Follow up on referrals.

42
Because Truth is Nonpartisan
  • 14 million funding initiative
  • 1 million Kresge Challenge We must raise
    6,050,776 by June 30, 2008
  • Increasing Regional Philanthropy Endowment
    matching program at the Community Foundation for
    Southeast Michigan
  • Your gift can help CRC meet its Kresge
  • Challenge and campaign goals!!!

43
Thank You!
  • For information on donating to the
  • Research Council and for copies of CRC
  • publications, please visit
  • www.crcmich.org
  • Bettie Buss
    bbuss_at_crcmich.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com