Title: Air%20Pollution%20and%20Carbon%20Sink
1Air Pollution and Carbon Sink
- M. Obersteiner, V. Stolbovoi, S. Nilsson
- IIASA - FOR
2LULUCF carbon credits
Air Pollution
3Carbon Sink (green) and Source (red) Regions
(analysis by 1x1 km grid)
4Based on IPCC (2001) and Steffen et al. (1998)
Atmospheric Pool
GPP 120 Gt C yr-1
5Carbon Flux Inventory for Boreal Zone (Mt)
59
Hydrosphere
20 Lithosphere
6Biochemical level Cellular level
Whole plant level Species level
Community level
Increasingly mechanistic Increasingly
integrative
NBP
CARBON SINK
GPP
ASSIMILATION
Processes
MAINTENANCE
STORAGE
DEFENCE
Rate Duration Sensitivity Resilience
Respiration Turnover
Level Chemistry Distribution dir. Resiliance
Amount Partitioning Timing Indirect Resilience
Properties
Decreased Production Altered Community Dynamics
Increased suceptibility to biotic and abiotic
stresses
Reduced assimilate supply
Implications
7The Integrator- Growth of (woody) plants
- Shoots
- Leaves
- Cambium
- Roots and Rhizosphere Symbionts
- Reproductive growth
- Changes in the carbon partitioning pattern
8Ecosystem response
- Structural and altered community dynamics
- Higher Risks
- Biotic (insect, pests and diseases)
- Abiotic
- Drought (also if cuticula or impaired stomatal
closure is injured winter desiccation) - Wind
- Cold hardiness
- Fire
9Factors affecting response
Hazard Vulnerability
Species and genotyp
Pollutant dosage frequency
Types combination
Stress tolerance mex.
Plant age
Interact with diseases
Environmental regime
10Vulnerability Management
- Earlier removal Short rotation species
- Less vulnerable species (less productive)
- Fertilization
- Mono height stands (decrease interceptive
surface) - Calamity management (decreased stocking for fire
prevention) - .
- Risk management
- decrease carbon stock in forest AND its
permanence, digression in ecosystem value and
higher costs
11Management for Carbon Sinks
Products
Vegetation
Medium-term Conservation
Living Biomass
Short-term Conservation
Soil
Surface Detritus
Underground Detritus
Organic-Mineral Phase
12Quantification and Verification
- Level Quantifying the sink strength
- Change Temporal verification of air pollution
effect is possible, but attribution is difficult
(link to carbon market). - However, management options are numerous and
effective (3.3 in SRES)
13Carbon market and Air pollutionStylised examples
- Case 1 Russian forest fire in 1998
- Case 2 Who pays for the lost removal - Austria
- Case 3 Environmental additionality - JI in
Poland
14Conclusion
- Yes, there are clear and quantitatively important
linkages - Methodology Risk augmented cost / benefit
- Land management is local and multiple criteria
- Consistency with MCPFE, BdConv., Food supply
15(No Transcript)