Title: Plasmas%20under%20pressure?
1(No Transcript)
2Plasmas under pressure? COST 529 Meeting
March-April 2006
David Wharmby Technology Consultant david_at_wharmby.
demon.co.uk
3This Lumileds slide really made me think
Source Lumileds (Dr R Scott Kern)
lm/W
27
85
21
30
24
(Luminance correlates with brightness - nit
candela m-2 lumen m-2 sr-1)
4Lumileds RD
guess 17W
55 W halogen 1500 gt20
Source Lumileds (Dr R Scott Kern)
5Radiance (W m-2 sr-1)
- Radiance Le and its visual weighted counterpart
luminance Lv, are fundamental - determine how effectively the light can be used
- no-one would use a fluorescent lamp in a
projector or projector lamp to light a room - this is why so many LED applications are
decoration not illumination - Luminance is conserved along a ray (or decreases
in a lossy system) - Lv d2Fv/ dAcosq.dW (lumen m-2 sr-1or cd
m-2) - We tend to WORSHIP lumens and efficacy we are
not very sensitive to systems needs which almost
invariably involve luminance
6Etendue usable light
- Emitted luminous flux Fv and luminance Lv are
related etendue e Fv/Lv - units (m2 sr)
- Etendue is conserved in perfect optics
- e AW (small A and W ) so a large object/small
solid angle becomes small image/large solid
angle - e.g. if a projector system the etendue is
defined by the LCD gate dimensions If esource gt
egate some emitted light from the source is
wasted
7Must match source e to application e
- Example
- In UHP, arc W is large so source area A must be
small to comparable with LCD etendue. - etendue e AWA 0.1 mm2W 2p
True of any display application we need to
think etendue
8LEDs produce little flux installations rely on
high Lv etendue e
Functional
Decorative
9Fundamental limitations to light production
- A lot of light is produced by accelerating
electrons - For plasmas in gases (and wires) electrons are
thermalised by collisions at Te - radiance (luminance) limited by Planck function
- In semiconductor sources electron energy directly
excites luminescent level - not limited by Planck function
- But there are many competing processes in
semiconductors - In phosphors, radiation directly excites
luminescent level - radiation is not limited by Planck (or Stokes)
- In lasers are far from equilibrium, population
inversion is required
Planck limits plasmas, but not LEDs, phosphors
Cayless M A, Future developments in lamps, IEE
PROC., vol. 127 part A, 211-218, 1980
10Luminance of thermal non-thermal radiators
CMH
CMH
lasers
non-thermal incoherent sources (LEDs) are
catching up
11Example - UHP projection limits?
- Increase arc temperature - But how?
- Increasing power only increases peak T slowly
- More current? - electrodes on the edge
- Cannot increase arc gap - etendue decreases
- Make spectrum more Planck-like
- Peak temperature may decrease
- Molecular absorption increases
- Increase ionization losses, but how?
- Use plasma hot spots caused by electrode cooling
- Use other emitters, but which?
- ???
- Transient discharges for high Te?
- heat capacity too high
-
UHP lamps 100-200 bar Hg (Derra et al. 2004)
Near the limits new direction needed
12Summary - low etendue sources
- Planck (black body) distribution is limit in
thermal equilibrium - All plasmas are Planck limited, so high Te
essential - LEDs are not Planck limited have ever
increasing luminance - Many applications for high luminance/ low
etendue sources - automotive forward lighting
- projection
- decorative/accent lighting
- display lighting
- BUT . . .I find it difficult to believe LEDS will
ever produce adequate lumens/ for general
illumination
13But OLEDs are a different matter . . . .
14OLEDs low luminance, high etendue
2002
2003
15OLEDs low luminance, high etendue but with
improved flux
2003 Performance Specifications CCT 4000K CRI
88 15 LPW 1200 Lumens Better color quality than
fluorescent Still glass substrate (cost, weight)
Equivalent to 80 W incandescent
16Lighting Wallpaper?
Roll to roll line planned 2007
Now - Plastic substrate with very low
permeability coatings
With thanks to Anil Duggal GE Global Research
17General illumination
- Fluorescent lamps are near their limit
- Possible approaches to improvement of low
radiance sources are - quantum splitting phosphors (aimed at Hg free but
apply to Hg-RG) - needs fundamental work on very complex crystal
field and phonon interactions in crystal lattices
1,2 - direct production of white light in the visible
region - molecular discharges seem the only option but
fundamental work is needed to understand what is
possible 3 - OLEDS are not Planck limited
- a long way short, but improving rapidly
potentially low cost
1. First Observation of Quantum Splitting
Behavior in Nanocrystalline SrAl12O19Pr, Mg
Phosphor Sergio M. Loureiro et al., Chem.
Mater., 17 (12), 3108 -3113, 2005 2. Visible
Quantum Cutting in LiGdF4Eu3 Through
Downconversion, RT Wegh et al. Science 1999,
pp663-666 3. Molecular discharges as light
sources R Hilbig et al. LS10 2004
18Conclusions
- Emission from plasmas (solid and gaseous) limited
by Planck - Existing sources seem to show no room for major
improvements - Possible major improvements in phosphors and
visible emission from LP discharges - Massive scientific effort needed in both areas
- Emission from solid state light sources not
limited by Planck function - but there are many complex competing processes
reduce conversion efficiency - these are being sorted out with great vigour
- LEDs show greatest potential in low etendue
applications (display, projection, decorative) - OLEDs show greatest potential in general lighting
applications (high etendue)
We need new ideas for Planck limited sources