Title: HEALTH ECONOMICS Lecture 3: Health care systems
1HEALTH ECONOMICSLecture 3 Health care systems
2Outline
- Market failure ? government intervention
- Design of health care systems
- Group work part 1
- Health system of your home country
- Break
- Group work part 2
- Assessing performance of health systems
- WHO assessment of performance
3Assignment
- Essay format
- Introduction
- Main text
- Conclusion
- Economic arguments
- Economic theory
- Empirical evidence
- Can briefly highlight other arguments
- Scottish NHS
- Faces similar issues to UK NHS
- Current state of play
4The way that health care is
supplied varies markedly from country to country,
stretching on the one hand from the U.K.
National Health Service to the more
market-oriented system of the U.S.A, from
salaried systems for the medical profession to
fee-per-item of service, from zero money prices
at the point of consumption, to substantial
co-payment by consumers. (Mooney, 1992)
5(No Transcript)
6Free markets in health care
- What would happen if all health care would be
bought and sold in the market? - Fiercely debated
- Green argues that the market would deliver the
best possible care at the lowest possible cost - Most economists argue that the special
characteristics of health care results in market
failure and that government intervention is
required - Free markets in health care are very rare
- US comes closest
7Conditions perfect market
- Numerous small producers with no market power
- No restrictions on potential producers entering
the market - Perfect knowledge
- No externalities
8Perfect knowledge?
- Uncertainty regarding
- When am I going to need health care?
- The costs of health care?
- The effects of health care on health status?
- Cannot plan future consumption
- ? People take out health care insurance
- premium expected health care expenditure plus
admin costs and profits
9Why do unregulated health insurance markets
fail?
- Diseconomies of small scale
- Excessive administrative and marketing costs
- Higher premium levels ? people not covered
- Solution public insurance (economies of scale,
no exploitation, whole population covered) - For example
- USA private insurance - admin costs 13-22
- Australia public system - admin costs 5
-
-
10Why do unregulated health insurance markets
fail?
- Adverse selection
- Asymmetry of information buyers have more
information - about their risk status than sellers
- Community rated (average) premium
- Premium too high for low risks who drop out ?
average risk increases ? premium increases - Leads to experience or risk rating
11Why do unregulated health insurance markets
fail?
- Moral Hazard
- third party payment
- do not bear the costs of health care
- Consumer moral hazard
- adopt less healthy lifestyles
- more likely to use health care
-
- Provider moral hazard
- doctors and hospitals
- recommend more treatment than necessary (SID)
12Moral Hazard
- Can lead to cost escalation
- Increases in premiums
- People do not insure and so have difficulty
accessing health care - Policies
- - a role for consumer charges?
- - give doctors a budget (fundholding and HMOs)
- - gatekeepers
- - capped budgets
13Licensure
- There has never been a free market for doctors
- Need for standards and control over conduct in
health care market is universally accepted - Those permitted to practice must hold minimum
qualifications
14Asymmetry of information
- consumer wants health status
- cannot buy health status
- buys health care in expectation it will
contribute to health status - Market fails to provide information on the effect
of health care - on health status
15Market failure due to asymmetry of information
- Asymmetry of information
- doctors act as agents for patients
- agency relationship
- potential for supplier-induced demand (SID)
- the amount of care the patient would have
demanded if they had the same information and
knowledge as the doctor - doctors own interests versus patients interests
-
16Market failure due to asymmetry of information
- Policies
- - Regulation and licensure of medical
profession - - Payments systems
- - Make patients better consumers
- - Doctor-patient relationship
- information transfer
- involvement in decision making
17Market failure due to externalities
- Externalities
- costs and benefits from decision-making that
affect others well being - positive externality
- Vaccination
- caring externality
- negative externality
- communicable diseases
- iatrogenic illness (hospital acquired infections)
- Not accounted for in unregulated markets - market
may under provide health care - Leads to government subsidisation of health care
-
-
18The perfect market
- Why is it important when it doesnt exist?
- Need to use it as a standard to compare what
happens in the real world - Need to understand it, since people do advocate
its use in health care - Maximises consumer well-being (utility) within
the resources available to society (allocative
efficiency) - Need to try and replicate its desirable outcomes
19Designing a health care system
- Decide on method of raising money - this will
influence population coverage - After this, there are questions common to many
systems - How will hospitals and other institutions be
rewarded? - How will doctors and other professions be
remunerated? - Are you going to have user charges? If so, to
what extent? - How will the market be organised? Competitive
or non-competitive?
20Health care financing systems
Publicly financed
Privately financed
Out of pocket payments
Social insurance
Private insurance
Taxation based systems
Co-payment and user fees
Group/ind. schemes
General taxes
Single fund
HMOs/PPOs .
Multiple funds
Full payment .
Hypothecated taxes
21Public/private mix
PROVISION
Private
Public
Public
2
1
FINANCE
Private
3
4
22Managed care HMOs PPOs
- Health maintenance organisations (HMOs)
- Provide (or arrange and pay for) comprehensive
health care for a fixed periodic per capita
payment which is paid by the consumer - Four types
- Staff model
- Group model
- Network model
- Independent practice association
23Managed care HMOs PPOs
- Preferred Provider Organisations (PPOs)
- A group of doctors and/or hospitals that provides
medical service only to a specific group or
association - Rather than prepaying for medical care, PPO
members pay for services as they are rendered - The PPO sponsor (employer or insurance company)
generally reimburses the member for the cost of
the treatment, less any co-payment percentage
24Social health insurance
- Characteristics
- Compulsory membership
- Payroll deduction of contributions
- Run by public bodies
- Redistributional policies
25Payment systems
- Doctors
- fee-for-service
- capitation
- salary
- Hospitals
- global budgeting
- per diem payment
- diagnostic related groups (DRG)
26Cost sharing
- Several forms possible
- deductible
- pre-specified fixed amount
- copayment
- Advantages
- patient bears some of financial cost
- transfer of financial burden
27Competition
- Competition
- between providers
- between purchasers
- private insurers
- public purchasers
- Will it improve efficiency?
28Dutch health care system
- Method of raising money
- Exceptional Medical Expenses Act (AWBZ)
- Social Insurance payments
- Private Insurance payments
- Way hospitals are rewarded
- Prospective functional budgeting
- Way hospital consultants are remunerated
- Fee for service (but agreed volume of services)
- Way GPs are remunerated
- Capitation for publicly insured
- Fee for service for privately insured
29Dutch health care system
- User charges
- publicly insured drugs
- privately insured mostly copayment
- Competition
- possible between sickness funds, but regional
monopolies - private insurance companies
302006 reforms
- Single health insurance system
- Covers a basic package
- Mandatory
- Can change insurer every year
- Insurer has to accept everyone
31Comparing health care systems
- Points to remember
- Different mixes of health care finance
provision in different countries reflect ideology - A health care system designed to meet the
ideology of one country is unlikely to
successfully meet the criteria of another
ideology in a different country - Rival ethical bases (Culyer, Maynard Williams,
1981) - Viewpoint A
- access to health care is similar to access to
other goods and is part of societys reward
system - Viewpoint B
- access to health care is a citizens right which
should not depend on income or wealth
32ExampleSystem X (U.S.A.?)
- Guiding principle consumer sovereignty
- Access according to willingness to pay
- Private insurance with cost sharing
- Private ownership of medical facilities
- Minimal state control over budgets resource
distribution - Rewards of suppliers determined by markets
33ExampleSystem Y (U.K.?)
- Guiding principle improvement of health of
entire population - access according to need
- Tax based finance system, free at point of use
- Public ownership of medical facilities
- Central control over budgets resource
distribution - Countervailing monopsony power to influence
rewards of suppliers