Title: Ohio Health Markets: How Do They Compare?
1Ohio Health MarketsHow Do They Compare?
- Presented to
- Health Action Council
- May 24, 2006
- Allan Baumgarten, J.D., M.A.
2Presentation Outline
- Key trends for health plans
- Commercial enrollment moves to PPOs
- Profitability is generally strong
- Premium revenues
- Market niches - new Medicaid plans
- Competing hospital systems in Ohio
- Purchaser concerns
3Ohio HMO Enrollment, 1995-2005
4HMO Enrollment Growth (or not) in Ohio and Other
States
5Market Share for Other Ohio Health Insurance Plans
6Managed Care as a Focused, Niche Market
- Emergence of new HMOs for Medicaid/SCHIP - in
Ohio AmeriGroup, Centene (Buckeye), Molina - Commercial plans shift out of HMO to PPO and
similar plans - examples of United and Humana - New Medicare HMOs form in several states or enter
new states - Fewer regional plans remain as provider systems
exit insurance business - Ohio examples of
SummaCare, Family Health and QualChoice
7HMO Enrollment Declines Because
- Employers move to PPOs because of
- Narrow premium gap
- Perceived enrollee satisfaction
- Self-funding preferred in times of high rate
increases - Health plan preference/strategy away from risk
- The fall of MedicareChoice - the rise of
Medicare Advantage? - Trend moderates because of growth of Medicaid
managed care - but - Medicaid is increasingly a
niche business
8Strong Health Plan Profitability
- Medicare is especially strong in some states
- Commercial plans maintain the spread between
premiums and medical costs - medical cost
increases fell below projections and pricing - Medicaid HMOs are seeing strong net income and
are eager to expand
9HMO Net Income in Ohio andOther States
10Premium Revenue Trend For Ohio HMOs
11HEDIS Measure Comparison
Acute Days Control High BP Rating of Health Plan
Aetna 243 61.35 59.04
Anthem 238 75.13 69.33
Kaiser 209 57.42 73.02
Medical Mutual 191 63.50 65.75
UnitedHC 211 67.09 61.29
122004 Hospital Market ShareNortheast Ohio
13Hospital System Net Income, 2002-2004
14Hospital System Revenue Per Inpatient Day
15Cincinnati Area Hospital Market Share, 2004
16Hospital System Net Income
17Cincinnati Hospital Revenue
18Provider Relations and Payment
- Consolidated hospitals gain increased leverage in
negotiations - drop unprofitable contracts, push
back on payment rates - Physicians still struggle with organizational
models, risk arrangements - Overall use of capitation declines - in Ohio from
19 of provider payments in 2000 to 8 in 2004
19Incentives for Providers
- Pay for Performance
- Designated providers
- Tiered networks
20Purchaser Initiatives Questions
- Employers seeking predictability in costs, while
preserving access to broad provider networks. - Employers pay when hospitals use their leverage
to increase payment rates from health plans - Interest in consumer-choice plans but
hesitation about unanswered questions (tax
treatment, impact on people with chronic
conditions). - Variation in practice - can you design networks
and benefit plans based on identifying high
performing providers? - Pay for Performance initiatives - value added?
21Conclusions/Comments
- The challenge is the same how can we expand
access to high-quality care while containing
growth of costs? - How can the interest of all parties be aligned -
consumers, providers, purchasers and health
plans? - How to focus policymakers of issues of access,
affordability and quality of care?
22For Additional Information
- Allan Baumgarten
- www.AllanBaumgarten.com
- 4800 W. 27th Street
- Minneapolis, MN 55416
- E-mail Baumg010_at_umn.edu
- 952/925-9121 Fax 952/95-9341