Testing for ELLs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Testing for ELLs

Description:

Purposes of Language Proficiency Testing. Available tests ... CELLA. http://www.nj.gov/education/bilingual/resources/prof_tests.htm. 4 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: lram3
Category:
Tags: cella | ells | testing

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Testing for ELLs


1
Testing for ELLs
  • Presenters
  • Sandee McHugh-McBride, ESL Teacher, Howell
    Township Public Schools
  • Lori Ramella, Education Specialist
  • NJ Department of Education

2
Purposes of Language Proficiency Testing
  • Available tests
  • http//www.nj.gov/education/bilingual/resources/pr
    of_tests.htm
  • Placement decisions
  • Eligibility/entrance
  • Exiting

3
Test Options
  • ACCESS for ELLs
  • W-APT
  • MODEL
  • IPT
  • LAS
  • LAS Links
  • MAC II
  • CELLA
  • http//www.nj.gov/education/bilingual/resources/pr
    of_tests.htm

4
Additional Options for Kindergarten
  • W-APT
  • MODEL
  • ACCESS for ELLs

5
New Kindergarten ACCESS for ELLs
  • purposes
  • advantages
  • comments http//www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?smJh
    tY4cCOebKmKX92UgDagw_3d_3d

6
Administering the K ACCESS for ELLs
  • What is the test measuring?
  • How does it relate to the WIDA Standards?
  • How does it connect to the curriculum?

7
Old vs. New K ACCESS for ELLs
  • Activity Examine the old and new K score report
    with a partner. Compare and contrast them.
  • What are the advantages of the new K score report?

8
New Kindergarten ACCESS for ELLs
  • Scale scores range from 100-600
  • 2 proficiency level scores on teacher report
  • Instructional
  • Accountability
  • Maximum composite score 6.0

9
W-APT vs. ACCESSfor ELLs Similarities
  • Assessment domains listening, speaking, reading,
    writing
  • Standards addressed all 5 WIDA Standards
  • Kindergarten test individually administered and
    adaptive
  • Format of speaking test individually
    administered and adaptive
  • Format of listening and reading test multiple
    choice
  • Format of writing test constructed response

10
W-APT vs. ACCESSfor ELLsDifferences
11
Types of Scores
12
Raw Scores
  • Number of items student answered correctly
  • Least valuable in monitoring growth
  • Not directly comparable across grades or tiers
  • Level of difficulty varies from item to item

13
Scale Scores
  • WIDA ACCESS for ELLs Scale Scores are
    transformations of raw scores.
  • Range from 100 to 600 (above 500 is rare)
  • Scale scores are ideal for tracking growth
  • Vertically-equated scale applies to all grades
    and all test forms can be compared across grades
    and tiers and within language domains, but not
    across them
  • Scale scores do take age differences into
    account assessment tasks taken by students in
    the grade 9-12 cluster are more challenging than
    the assessment tasks taken by students in the
    grade 1-2 cluster

14
Levels of English Language Proficiency
15
Performance Definitions

16
CAN DO Descriptors
  • Show what ELLs can do in a particular language
    domain
  • Give samples of the language expectations of ELLs
    across the continuum of language development
  • Can be used as a standards-based resource tool
    and in conjunction with the WIDA Standards
  • Are specific to grade-level clusters (Pre-K-K
    1-2 3-5 6-8 9-12)
  • Are particularly useful for assisting
    content/mainstream teachers with interpretation
    of ELL students ELP levels
  • Can be applied across the 5 WIDA Standards

17
Proficiency Level Scores
  • An interpretation of scale scores
  • Ideal for describing student performance in terms
    of the 6 WIDA language proficiency levels
  • Scores are used to help inform exiting decisions
  • Scores are represented by whole numbers and a
    decimal (e.g., 4.3)

18
ACCESS for ELLs Scores
19
Overall Composite Score
20
Scores Received Student Level (Summary)
  • Each student also receives a scale score and a
    proficiency level for Oral Language, Literacy,
    Comprehension, and Overall Composite.

21
Examining Score Reports for Instruction
  • Jigsaw activity
  • Select one of the sample score reports (parent,
    teacher, student roster, school frequency,
    district frequency).
  • Work with a partner to answer the following
  • What is the purpose of the report?
  • What data are available?
  • How can you use the data?
  • What are the implications for instruction?
  • Which scores might best inform instruction?

22
Jigsaw
  • Now jigsaw back into the whole group and share
    what you learned about the score report examined.

23
Relating the Standards to the Assessment
Sample ACCESS for ELLsTest Items (Summative
Framework)
24
(No Transcript)
25
References
  • Kindergarten ACCESS for ELLs MODEL Training
    DVD
  • 2008-09 ACCESS for ELLs Training Toolkit
  • Interpretation of ACCESS for ELLs Score
    Reports, Don Bouchard, September 2008
  • www.nj.gov/education/bilingual
  • www.wida.us
  • WIDA Focus on Growth, Volume 1 Issue 1, March 11,
    2009
  • smcbride_at_howell.k12.nj.us lori.ramella_at_doe.state.n
    j.us
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com