Spatial%20Structure%20Evolution%20of%20Open%20Star%20Clusters - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Spatial%20Structure%20Evolution%20of%20Open%20Star%20Clusters

Description:

What we have learned/taught in AST101: irregularly and sparsely shaped. ... (e.g., coeval vs periodic bursts) done. Structural Evolution dynamics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:134
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: astroN
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spatial%20Structure%20Evolution%20of%20Open%20Star%20Clusters


1
Spatial Structure Evolution of Open Star Clusters
  • W. P. Chen and J. W. Chen
  • Graduate Institute of Astronomy National Central
    University
  • IAU-APRM2002.7.03 Tokyo

2
Open Clusters
  • What we have learned/taught in AST101
    irregularly and sparsely shaped.
  • How irregular are they anyway?

IC 348 by 2MASS
3
Globular Clusters
Stars concentrate progressively toward the
center. The King model (1962) is understood as a
combination of an isothermal sphere i.e.,
dynamically relaxed in the inner part of the
cluster, and tidal truncation by the Milky Way in
the outer part.
Surface brightness of M3 (Da Costa and Freeman,
1976)
4
King Model (1962)
rc core radius rt tidal radius k ? central
number density
5
Structure of an Open Cluster
  • The initial stellar distribution in a star
    cluster is dictated perhaps by the structure in
    the parental molecular cloud. (Initial)
  • As the cluster evolves, the distribution is
    modified by gravitational interaction among
    member stars. (Internal)
  • Eventually stellar evaporation and external
    disturbances --- Galactic tidal force,
    differential rotation, and collision with
    molecular clouds --- would dissolve the cluster.
    (External)

6
Spatial Structure by Star Counting in 2MASS
  • Stellar density within concentric annuli
  • Center too crowded to resolve by 2MASS outer
    part follows well a King model
  • Background uniform out to large angular extents
  • Klim (3-?)15.6 --- not deep enough to reach MS,
    for distant and old globular clusters

Projected radial stellar density of a GC, M55
7
2MASS 3-sigma limit
8
Open cluster NGC 2506 (1.9 Gyr 3.3 kpc) mosaiced
from 2MASS data
9
Sources toward NGC2506 and the surface density
10
(No Transcript)
11
Locations of sample galactic open clusters.
http//www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/
12
(No Transcript)
13
Cumulative stellar density profiles for NGC 2506
(1.9 Gyr 3.3 kpc) shows apparent evidence of
mass segregation
in contrast to that in M11 found by Mathieu
(1984)
14
Stars in the young (5 Myr) star cluster IC 348
are centrally concentrated, and seem to segregate
? star formation processes more than subsequent
dynamic evolution
15
The old (9 Gyr) open cluster Berkeley 17 shows no
evidence of mass segregation.
16
Cluster l,b ?(Myr) N M/M? D (kpc) Rs() R (pc) ? re(Myr) t/t re Segr.
Young Young Young Young Young Young Young Young Young Young Young
NGC1893 174, -02 4 498 309 4.4 6.5 8.9 291 0.01 ?
IC348 160, -18 5 322 200 0.32 16.5 1.6 14 0.2 Y
Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate
NGC1817 186, -13 800 236 146 2.1 12.5 7.9 139 6 N?
NGC2506 231, 10 1,900 1,038 643 3.3 17.5 17.3 605 3 Y
NGC2420 198, 20 2,200 450 279 2.5 12.5 9.4 223 10 Y
Old Old Old Old Old Old Old Old Old Old Old
NGC6791 070, 11 8,000 1,095 679 4.2 10.5 13.2 543 15 ?
Be17 176, -04 9,000 370 229 2.5 9.5 7.1 142 63 N
17
Relaxation Time
  • tcross R/V trelax tcross.Ncross
  • Ncross 0.1 N / ln N
  • tevap 100 trelax
  • R radius V velocity dispersion
  • N number of member stars

18
NGC 1893 --- 4 Myr
19
IC 348 --- 5 Myr
20
NGC1817 --- 800 Myr
21
NGC 6791 --- 8,000 Myr
22
Be 17 --- 9,000 Myr
23
Summary
  • 2MASS good for study of open clusters - Full
    data release expected end of 2002 - Deep IR
    images to differentiate the MS (IR
    camera with Nagoya U PMO)
  • Stars in an open cluster, regardless of masses,
    are concentrated progressively toward the center.
  • The youngest star clusters show evidence of
    luminosity (mass) segregation - cf. molecular
    cloud structure (SMA)

24
Summary --- II
  • By a few Gyr (several relaxation times), clusters
    become highly relaxed, until dynamical
    disruptions dominate.
  • Tidal distortions (age, location, massive vs
    low-mass stars)? Open clusters (scattering
    around the galactic disk) as probes of galactic
    mass distribution e.g., disk vs volume
    potential - galactic disk and (dark) halo models

25
Our knowledge, or even recognition, of galactic
open clusters is highly incomplete, most biased
toward the ones that are nearby and with bright
stars.
26
Open clusters are distributed widely around the
galactic disk.
27
Open Cluster Study at NCU
  • Luminosity Function Evolution? age and star
    formation history (e.g., coeval vs periodic
    bursts) done
  • Structural Evolution ? dynamics? probing
    galactic mass distribution (e.g., disk vs volume
    potential) ½ done
  • Variability and rotation vs magnetic activity
    doing

28
Open Clusters/NCU --- cont.
  • Lulin 1 m telescope (Taiwan) August 2002
  • Maidanak Observatory (Uzbekistan) 1.5 m and 1 m
  • Moletai Obs. 1.65 m (Lithuania)
  • YALO 1 m (Chile)
  • Imaging plus CORAVEL high-resolution spectroscopy
  • Kentucky-Yunnan-Taiwan Telescope (KYTT) to lift
    off by 2004-2005?

29
Fast rotating stars P(rot) lt 12 d (BLUE) are
distinguished from slow rotators (RED) by their
X-ray luminosity (normalized to solar in
yellow. The Rossby number gives the rotation
period in units of the eddy's lifetime.
(http//www.aip.de/groups/turbulence/star_t.html)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com