Philosophy 224 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophy 224

Description:

The selection from Strawson is from the 1959 book that established his reputation. ... These two modes of predication are coeval, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:531
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: PhilipM
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophy 224


1
Philosophy 224
  • Some Candidates Strawson on Individuals

2
Individuals An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics
  • The selection from Strawson is from the 1959 book
    that established his reputation.
  • Descriptive metaphysics is content to describe
    the actual structure of our thought about the
    world (Strawson 1959, 9).
  • It is to be contrasted with revisionary
    metaphysics, which is concerned to produce a
    better structure (Strawson 1959, 9).

3
Strawsons Philosophical Perspective
  • Strawson is an analytic philosopher.
  • APs are the inheritors of the empiricist and
    (especially) naturalistic tendencies of the
    modern era.
  • Strawson belongs to the linguistic
    analysis/ordinary language wing of analytic
    philosophy.
  • A primary method of this approach is to
    interrogate the everyday senses of the
    philosophical concepts or terms at issue.

4
Strawsons Metaphysics
  • So what did Strawsons interrogations produce?
  • Strawson divides existence into particulars and
    universals.
  • Some of the particulars are basic, which means
    that they are the experiential and conceptual
    building blocks of experience.
  • The table can be analyzed or deconstructed into
    parts, but that is not the way we immediately
    apprehend the table.

5
So, what is a person?
  • A person is a basic particular to which we
    ascribe consciousness.
  • These two modes of predication are coeval,
  • a personis a type of entity such that both
    predicates ascribing states of consciousness and
    predicates ascribing corporeal characteristicsare
    equally applicable to a single individual of
    that single type (178c1).

6
Why is it primitive?
  • Strawson offers his account as part of a
    rejection of other competing accounts, including
    the mind-body dualisms of the modern era.
  • From this perspective, person is not logically
    primitive, in as much as it is definable in terms
    of more basic kinds (mind and matter
    consciousness over time etc.).
  • Weve seen the problems that come from this
    dualistic account. Strawson has the solution the
    person is logically basic and entities like
    individual consciousness are derivative.
  • Cf., 179c1

7
So what?
  • In addition to resolving many of the issues
    arising in connection to the accounts of the
    person rooted in mind/body dualism, Strawsons
    account of personhood also has some useful
    implications for the philosophy of mind.
  • Of particular importance is the distinction
    between M- and P-predicates.

8
M- and P-
  • M- and P- predicates work in the same way
    (pointing out a specific, properly basic and
    primitive, entity), but P-predicates have an
    importantly different form when ascribed to
    oneself as opposed as being ascribed to others.
  • This difference implies that we must also ascribe
    self-ascription to all of the others (181c2).
  • This in turn undercuts species of relativism and
    logical behaviorism (attribution is about
    behavior, not mental states).

9
What about Life After Death?
  • Strawson closes with a consideration of the
    implication of his picture for the belief in an
    immortal soul.
  • Such a soul would in effect have P-predicates but
    not m-predicates.
  • Its not impossible (you can certainly think
    m-predicates without p-predicates).
  • The question is What would it be like to be a
    soul?

10
Solipsism, of what?
  • P-ascription without M-ascription would condemn
    the entity to solipsism, it must remain for him
    indeed an utterly empty, though not meaningless,
    speculation, as to whether there are any other
    members of his class (186c1).
  • At best a former person, in as much as Person
    P-ascription and M-ascription.
  • One implication Argument from necessity for
    bodily resurrection.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com