MIDTERM REVIEW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

MIDTERM REVIEW

Description:

In the second part, you will select one of three possible essay questions to answer. ... inductive arguments, deductive arguments, valid, strong, cogent, sound, etc... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Moni6
Category:
Tags: midterm | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MIDTERM REVIEW


1
MIDTERM REVIEW
  • Philosophy 2010

2
Midterm Format
  • Your midterm will have two parts.
  • The first part will consist of 25 multiple choice
    questions covering chapters 1-7.
  • In the second part, you will select one of three
    possible essay questions to answer. Essays need
    only be 1.5-2 pages long. Please bring a Blue
    Book.

3
Essays
  • The essay will be worth 50 of your midterm
    score, and it will be graded according to the
    following criteria
  • Does it adequately answer the question?
  • Does it follow the proper format? (i.e. thesis,
    supporting points, conclusion)
  • Is it clear and largely devoid of grammatical
    and spelling errors?

4
Preview
  • An essay question might ask you to defend or
    criticize a particular ethical theory (ex.
    utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics)
  • An essay question might ask you to analyze a
    specific moral dilemma and to explain how
    utilitarians, deontologists, and virtue ethicists
    would approach the problem

5
Preview Continued
  • An essay question might ask you to compare and
    contrast different approaches within the same
    theoretical framework (for ex. Mills
    utilitarianism versus Benthams utilitarianism or
    Aristotelian virtues versus Nietzschean virtues)
  • An essay question might ask you to identify a
    major problem with one or more of the ethical
    theories weve discussed and to provide a
    solution that would mitigate or solve the problem.

6
Writing Tips
  • Prepare an outline before beginning your essay.
    Figure out your primary thesis, and then come up
    with 2-4 points that support your claim.
  • Back up your points with textual references,
    examples, and/or explicit reasoning

7
Writing Tips Continued
  • Be thorough too much information is better than
    too little information. Make sure you at least
    meet the minimum page requirement.
  • Dont use informal language. (Ex.Kant sucks
    because)
  • Proofread your essay before turning it in

8
Multiple Choice Section
  • This section will consist of questions much like
    those on your quizzes. To prepare you should
  • Review the chapters paying particularly close
    attention to the review boxes
  • Review the lecture notes
  • Take a look at previous quizzes

9
Chapter 7 (4 questions)
  • You need
  • A working understanding of the key elements of
    virtue ethics and how it differs from the other
    major theories weve discussed
  • Definitions of key terms like virtue, eudaimonia,
    golden mean, etc..
  • An understanding of how to evaluate the theory
    (ex. which criteria does the theory have
    difficulty meeting and why?)
  • You also need to keep in mind major proponents of
    the theory.

10
Chapter 6 (4 questions)
  • You need
  • A working understanding of the key elements of
    nonconsequentialist theories and how they differ
    from the other major theories weve discussed
  • Definitions of key terms like perfect duties,
    categorical/hypothetical imperatives, doctrine of
    double effect, etc..
  • An understanding of how to evaluate the theory
    (ex. which criteria does the theory have
    difficulty meeting and why?)
  • You also need to keep in mind major proponents of
    the theory.

11
Chapter 5 (4 questions)
  • You need
  • A working understanding of the key elements of
    consequentialist theories and how they differ
    from the other major theories weve discussed
  • Definitions of key terms like egoism,
    utilitarianism, greatest happiness principle,
    etc..
  • An understanding of how to evaluate the theory
    (ex. which criteria does the theory have
    difficulty meeting and why?)
  • You also need to keep in mind major proponents of
    the theory.

12
Chapter 4 (3 questions)
  • You need
  • A working understanding of the criteria for
    evaluating moral theories
  • Coherence
  • Consistency with considered moral judgments
  • Consistency with our moral experience
  • Usefulness in moral problem-solving
  • Definitions of any bolded terms in the chapter

13
Chapter 3 (5 questions)
  • You need
  • To be able to identify the elements of an
    argument (premises and conclusion)
  • Definitions of bolded terms inductive arguments,
    deductive arguments, valid, strong, cogent,
    sound, etc
  • To know what the listed fallacies are (ex.
    begging the question, equivocation, faulty
    analogy, etc..)

14
Chapter 2 (3 questions)
  • You need
  • An understanding of what subjectivism,
    relativism, and emotivism mean
  • Definitions of bolded terms objectivism,
    cultural relativism, etc
  • An understanding of how to evaluate the theories
    (ex. which criteria does each have difficulty
    meeting and why?)

15
Chapter 1 (2 questions)
  • You need
  • Definitions of bolded terms objectivism,
    cultural relativism, etc
  • To be aware of the elements of ethics
    preeminence of reason, universal perspective,
    principle of impartiality, and dominance of moral
    norms

16
  • Any questions?
  • 10 minute study break followed by the Chapter 7
    Quiz
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com