discussion topic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

discussion topic

Description:

Concepts are used in engn'rg design and are improved by experience. ... There may be cogent reasons for this relationship, related to society knowledge ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Jam9119
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: discussion topic


1
discussion topic
  • Models that are eco-sensitive ought to be
    encouraged, over those that arent.

2
A model is a concept. Concepts are used in
engnrg design and are improved by experience. We
do not necessarily require the model that most
approaches perfection, rather we seek the model
that provides an acceptably accurate explanation.
Simple models are often said to be better than
complex models. Optimal model complexity depends
on the questions to be resolved and the resources
available.
3
In this presentation there is nothing new under
the sun, Horatio
  • 1. We develop an obvious case for eco-ethical
    engineering,
  • 2. which clearly implies more complex
    design-analysis models,
  • 3. and supports another old philosophy
    period-of-record (continuous) design models

4
Starting suppositions
  • World's 1 long-term problem is Loss of habitat
    and bio-diversity, apparently irreversible.
  • Environmental problems are caused by humans,
    mainly by their population pressure, and can be
    solved by modifying their behavior.
  • On the other hand, we generally replace acute by
    chronic problems, at a price vigilance.

5
And a startling position
  • Often, simplistic methods are associated with
    poor drainage design, which is in turn associated
    with tough living conditions, whereas complex
    methods are associated with desirable conditions.
    There may be cogent reasons for this
    relationship, related to society knowledge and
    eco-sensitivity.
  • Reversal of environmental degradation has been
    shown in East Africa to lead directly to real
    improvements in living conditions, including
    employment opportunities.

6
An archeology of stormwater design
PERIOD MYTHOLOGY
IMPLEMENTS 1. "ante-diluvian "rational"
formula, slide rule, from c1892
I-D-F curves adding m/c, no data. 2.
ancient" event hydrology
batch mainframes, from c1932 unit
hydrographs, pocket calculator.
design storms. c1970 3. "modern"
continuous modeling 16-bit pcs, from c1962
time series management minis
c1980 4. new more than engineering.
32-bit work stations, from c1993 networks
These four periods correspond to use of a 1.
technique, 2. methodology, 3. philosophy 4.
value system
7
R0
Things should be made as simple as possible, but
not any simpler." - Albert Einstein
R1
8
Traditional design methods use
  • Few parameters, that subsume great complexity
  • Empirical equations, based on curve fitting
  • e.g. linear unit response functions, and
  • design storms based on IDF analysis. 
  • Reasons for Use
  • Tradition,
  • thought to produce conservative results,
  • thought to be inexpensive and easy to use.
  • Real reason circumvents the need for thought,
    eliminates complicated, modern issues.

9
From Pechers doctoral study, Germany ca. 1970
For permeable surfaces, vertical occurs at
capacity of upper layer
10
R81
  • Event vs continuous hydrology
  • Event hydrology accounts for wet event processes
    only.
  • Continuous hydrology on the other hand includes
    all dry weather processes.
  • Why do some agencies choose to ignore half the
    processes (the model is provided free, a generous
    gift of the US Govt)?

11
R81
  • Event vs continuous hydrology
  • Event hydrology is mistakenly thought to be a
    cheap design method it does however produce
    cheap (inadequate) designs. E.g., unit
    hydrograph and design storm methods cannot
    account for ecosystem concerns.
  • Continuous hydrology on the other hand allows
    consideration of aquatic ecosystem (and many
    other) issues.

12
Event models generally.
  • Do not simulate water quality build-up and
    wash-off
  • Do not simulate erosion and fluviology
  • Do not simulate important aquatic bio-system
    parameters
  • Do not simulate long-term performance
  • Do not account for the large number of light
    rainfalls
  • Do not account for sequences of high flows
  • Do not account for sequences of low flows
  • Do not account for seasonality
  • Require start-up conditions that are
    inconsistent, highly uncertain and critical
  • Deny consideration of ecosystem issues
  • Assume everything is stationary
  • Etc.

13
An overiding issue is the so-called first flush
  • Event models cannot predict first flush effect
  • First flush (gt50 TSS in rising limb of the
    hydrograph) probably exists wherever we have
    efficient drainage
  • Manufactured treatment devices and other BMPs are
    excellent for capturing the first flush
  • We obviously need to concentrate MTDs wherever a
    first flush may be experienced
  • Their long-term costs/benefits should be computed
  • We therefore need a continuous model that
    correctly predicts first flush.

14
We do not need to immediately and peremptorily
replace established event models
  • What I am suggesting is dont replace your
    traditional methods simply encourage addition of
    the (say) 50-years design storm to your current
    slate of design storm computations.

15
Why SWMM?
  • Most widely used general stormwater program
  • Used extensively for urban watershed planning,
    design, development, management, and regulation.
  • Vast archive of applications, users etc
  • PCSWMM for Stormceptor integrates and dovetails
    with these area-wide models.

16
How does this concern us?
  • Urbanization is by definition involved in habitat
    and biodiversity (HB) degradation (medicine is
    the complement)
  • Globally, we are told, HB problems are serious
    and getting worse
  • Long-term sustainable civilization, we are also
    told, is dependent on restored HB

17
Some humble suggestions
  • Develop in officials a deep eco-ethos to restore
    bio-diversity
  • Develop in the landscape intervention community a
    new spirit that restores ecosystem diversity.

18
Design should follow a sacred ecology of
focussing on less-unsustainable ecosystems
  • biological equity must determine design,
  • design must reflect bio-regionality,
  • projects should use renewable energy systems,
  • the living world should be the matrix for all
    design, which should integrate living systems,
    and follow the laws of life, and
  • projects should heal the planet

19
Good design
R86
  • examines very long-term changes and impacts
    (gt100y)
  • accepts the limits of our discipline
  • corrects the human behavior that caused the
    problem to the ecosystem
  • improves restores the natural balances and
    bio-diversity, imitates the structure of the
    natural, native or indigenous system, and is good
    for all parts of the natural system
  • does not enrich one individual or group to the
    distress or impoverishment of another
  • is in harmony with good character, cultural
    value, and moral law.

20
R81
On simplistic vs meaningful models
  • Simplistic short-term models have trapped us in a
    rut of producing only politically-correct
    solutions that fit single-minded ideas of
    economic growth (e.g. what is the minimum-cost
    unit?)
  • Complex, long-term and meaningful models open up
    a greater variety of options (e.g. what animals
    are affected by installing the unit?)

21
Prohibit uninformed use of incomprehensible models
  • More intelligent use of more credible models is
    what we seek. Training is important.

22
R2
As a rule
Models are used to help select the best among
competing proposals. It is fundamentally
irresponsible and unethical for modelers not to
interpret their inherent uncertainty.
23
The implicit problem in engineering design is
to find the optimum cost-effective array of best
practices. A solution may be stated if the
75-year rainfall time series that occurred at the
International Airport, had in fact occurred at
Foxran Estates, then plan 126 would have been the
most cost-effective of the 329 plans examined -
had they, of course, all existed over this time.
24
Models inevitably become more complex
- model complexity is related to the total number
of uncertain input parameters.
25
R89
Summary
  • For design follow a personal or sacred ecology
    (biological equity, design to restore
    bio-diversity, very long-term modelling).
  • For design and analysis, eschew simplistic models
    that do not help to restore the planet.
  • In development, consider the N American idea of a
    great spirit based on long-term ecosystem health
    and diversity.

26
The end
see you on-line at
www.computationalhydraulics.com
bill_at_computationalhydraulics.com wjames_at_uoguelph.
ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com