Overview of Lattice Design Work - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of Lattice Design Work

Description:

First-Order' method of estimating collimation depths for a given final doublet ... End Station A : Optics for collimation wake field studies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: aste7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of Lattice Design Work


1
Overview of Lattice Design Work
  • Deepa Angal-Kalinin
  • Daresbury Laboratory, UK
  • 7th July, 2005
  • LC-ABD Meeting, Cambridge

2
  • Lattice Design Team
  • Daresbury
    Laboratory
  • R. Appleby
  • F. Jackson
  • J. Jones
  • D. Angal-Kalinin
  • Cockcroft Institute
  • L. Jenner

3
  • Beam Delivery System Lattice Design
  • Design Requirements
  • Final focus
  • Collimation optics
  • Beam diagnostics section
  • Machine protection
  • Provision for two IRs
  • Crossing angle issues
  • Beam Extraction
  • Extract the highly disrupted beams
  • Transport to beam dumps
  • Beam sizes at beam dumps
  • Diagnostics
  • Beam dumps

4
First ILC Workshop, November04 WG4
recommendation, Working hypothesis
20 mrad design similar to NLC
2 mrad design Main design effort since KEK
workshop
D. Angal-Kalinins talk BDIR workshop
5
11 mrad NLC-style Big Bends
e-
2 mrad (L 3.51 m) dump lines
e
IR2 2 mrad
NLC BSY dump lines
20 mrad ILC FF9 (x 4)
IR1 20 mrad
IP separation 138 m (Z), 21 m (X)
20 mrad (L 3.51 m) dump lines
M.Woodley
6
Disrupted Beam Parameters at the IP for ILC
parameters (WG1)
Low energy tail extends to 4020 for nominal ILC
parameters and to lt 10 in high luminosity
options.
Total extracted beam power 11.3 MW (500GeV
CM) 18 MW (1 TeV CM)
7
2 mrad Extraction Scheme
warm QF (r 10mm) 140-153 T/m
SC QD (r ? 35mm) 214-228 T/m
1-1.9m
9m
2 mrad
L3.51m
6-7 mrad
1.3-2.3m
? optical transfer
to beam diagnostics
(consistent with ILC parameters group parameter
space)
R. Applebys talk BDIR workshop
8
2 mrad Crossing angle Extraction line design
SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force Several design
iterations since Nov04
  • Shared magnets for incoming and outgoing
  • Need large magnet apertures to accept both
    electron beams and photons.
  • Final doublet optimised for incoming and outgoing
    beam.

SF1
SD0
QF1
QD0
T. Maruyama
9
DIMAD tracking of disrupted beam through the
extraction line
Beam x envelope in doublet
Beam y envelope in doublet
-80 to -60
-60 to -40
-40 to -20
-20 to 0
TURTLE tracking of disrupted beam through the
extraction line
R. Applebys talk BDIR workshop
10
2 mrad Design Issues
  • Long and short doublet solutions based on maximum
    possible gradient of QD0 (in the presence of
    detector solenoid field)
  • Transverse size including cryostat
  • How does the magnet and cryostat size scales with
    the bore radius of the magnet?
  • Present design has very large aperture SC
    sextupoles
  • Special extraction line magnet designs SC and
    warm
  • Losses on magnets
  • Dedicated collimators
  • Backscattering and background issues
  • Collimation depths
  • Performance of diagnostics section

11
Collimation depth evaluation
  • First-Order method of estimating collimation
    depths for a given final doublet
  • To achieve SR fan clearance through IR apertures
  • DBLT by Olivier Napoly (Saclay) Analytical
    calculation
  • Assumes on-energy halo, omits effect of local
    chromaticity correction
  • Crucial apertures
  • Vertex, masks, and extraction quads
  • Crossing angle issues
  • SR fan may see non-symmetric apertures




  • F. Jacksonss talk BDIR
    workshop

12
Collimation depths
20 mrad
2 mrad
Long doublet
http//www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/lcd/ipbi/lcws05/
maruyama_backgrounds.ppt
Short doublet
F. Jacksonss talk BDIR workshop
13
20 mrad Collimation Performance (using STRUCT A.
Drozhdin)
?p 1
For the collimation depths found by DBLT ?
Some beam halo escapes to FD. Non-linear
transport and local chromaticity correction needs
closing of the spoiler openings marginally.
?p 0
F. Jacksonss talk BDIR workshop
14
Optics for beam diagnostics
  • Collaboration with Laser wire team for ATF/ATF2 ?
    1 mm sy

L.Jenner ATF, May 2005
  • Study proposed tuning and emittance section for
    the ILC
  • Beam sizes for laser wire estimate increase in
    length of the section
  • Requirements of generic beam diagnostics for ILC
    BDS
  • Accuracies and resolutions for these devices
  • Optimise the BDS lattice including beam
    diagnostics

15
Final focus optimisation
Bandwidth
  • Strong demagnification
  • High chromatic and geometric aberrations
  • Dipoles for non zero dispersion
  • Minimisation of chromatic and geometric
    aberrations is principle design challenge
  • Optimisation procedure to 2nd order
  • Collaborating with Saclay on global optimisation
    procedure

Emittance growth due to SR
Final focus optimisation, D. Angal-Kalinin, ASTeC
report
16
ATF2 optics and tolerances
  • Proposed final focus test facility at ATF to test
    the local chromaticity correction.
  • Achieve 35 nm vertical spot size at the focal
    point and nanometer control of beam position.
  • Two optics solutions were proposed in Nov04.
  • Comparison of these versions.
  • The scaled down version of NLC has been chosen
    for ATF2.

Chromaticities
xycorrected
xycorrected
xycorrected
xycorrected
NLC like version
Kuroda version
M.Pivi, D.Angal-Kalinin et al ATF2 optics
comparison report in preparation
17
ATF2 Tolerances and Tuning Knobs
Normal
  • Simulations of orbit correction and tuning
    procedure to define the estimations of jitter,
    fast and slow errors for magnet position, roll,
    field errors.
  • Tolerances defined as an rms error that
    leads to a 2 increase in beam size or a 15
    change in position whichever leads to a tighter
    tolerance.
  • J. Joness talk BDIR workshop
  • ATF2 proposal Section 3.2

Field Tolerances Individual Quads Multipole
Errors
Field Tolerances All Quads Multipole Errors
18
End Station A Optics for collimation wake field
studies
  • Requirements on beam spot-size
  • 100 ?m (vertical) for the wakefield and BPM
    experiments
  • lt 20 ?m (vertical and horizontal) for the
    material damage tests

20 ?m beam waist at collimator wakefield box
100 ?m beam waist at collimator wakefield box
D. Angal-Kalinin, F. Jacksons talk - 2nd
collimation meeting, Daresbury
19
Optics codes
  • Extraction line design
  • Guinea_PIG, MAD, DIMAD
  • MATLAB ? MAD, TRANSPORT, TURTLE
  • DIMAD comparison with BDSIM (Orsay, RHUL)
  • Collimation Studies
  • MERLIN, STRUCT,
    DBLT
  • (Manchester, RHUL, COLSIM task in
    EuroTeV)
  • Final Focus Studies
  • MAD, BETA, DIMAD, TRANSPORT, TURTLE
  • ATF2 optics and tuning studies
  • MAD, TRACY, BETA
  • Will start using SAD soon for
    ATF/ATF2 work.

20
Plans
  • Contribute to define a baseline configuration
    for the ILC.
  • Feedback from detector community ? L, physics
    evaluations for 2 crossing angles
  • Design BDS optics for 2 mrad case for different
    final doublets based on discussions with magnet
    experts.
  • Optimise collimation optics for better
    collimation efficiency.
  • Study the beam diagnostics section after the
    linac for possibility of using laser wires.
  • Study US cold option of fast extraction scheme
    and suggest other ideas.
  • Participate to ATF/ATF2 and ESA optics studies.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com