J. Payet, O. Napoly - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

J. Payet, O. Napoly

Description:

new collimation section required. with tail folding by ... Beam extraction through final doublet : OK. Collimation requirements about a factor 2 tighter ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: olivier76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: J. Payet, O. Napoly


1
Design of a new Final Focus System with l 4,5
m
  • J. Payet, O. Napoly
  • CEA/Saclay

2
New Final Focus NLC(P.Raimondi, A.Seryi)
Two optics with angular dispersion Dx at the
IP 1)  Long doublet  3 cm radius
aperture with 72 T/m, Dx 5 mrad 2)
 Short doublet  (not published) 1 cm
radius aperture with 140 T/m, Dx 9
mrad
3
New Final Focus NLC Chromatic correction
For both optics, ß-bandwidth gt 1 (TESLA
parameters)
ßx 15 mm
ßy 400 µm
4
New Final Focus NLC IP spot sizes
energy offset
energy offset
5
New Final Focus à la NLC
  • Advantages from the machine point-of-view
  • Better chromaticity correction ? larger l
  • l 5m ? final doublet moved out of the
    detector solenoid

chromaticity ? l / ß
6
New Final Focus with l 5m
  • Advantages from the detector point-of-view
  • Larger forward acceptance at low angles
  • Final doublet moved out of the calorimeter
  • ? less e.m. showers in the detector
  • Lighter Tungsten-mask and simpler support

7
Main issues of the Design
  • Extraction of Beam after the interaction
  • Extraction of Synchrotron Radiation from Final
    Doublet (i.e. check collimation requirements)
  • 3. Final Focus Optics

N.B. First two issues, independent of the FF
optics, depend only on l and on the
final doublet apertures F.
8
Beam Extraction
  • Final doublet acceptance
  • Tmax (E, f)
  • with
  • l 5m
  • F 48 mm
  • Solenoid BS 4 T

9
Comparison of horizontal acceptances (f 0) for
l 3,4,5 m
l5m acceptance better for lower
energies worse for high energies
Differences are small. Tracking simulations are
needed
10
Synchrotron Radiation Extraction
  • Collimation
  • requirements
  • for
  • l 5m
  • F 48 mm
  • inner mask
  • - s 4 m
  • - F 24 mm

11
Collimation Requirements
l m smask m Nx Ny
TDR 3 2 13 81
New FF 5 2 10 48
New FF 5 4 7.8 42
  • new collimation section required
  • with tail folding by octupoles

12
NLC type correction, l5m
Beamstrahlung Dump
SF3
SF2
SF1, SD1
SD2
IP angular dispersion Dx 10 mrad
13
NLC type correction, l5m
ex _at_ 400 GeV 10-11 m.rad
Emittance growth minimized by fine tuning of
dipoles
14
NLC type correction, l5m
IP spot sizes
15
Correction type NLC, l5m
L/L0 0.86 for sE/E 0.4 ,
IP spot sizes and luminosity
16
Hybrid Correction, l5m
Beamstrahlung Dump
SH
SH
SV2
SV1
IP angular dispersion, Dx 2.6 mrad
17
Hybrid correction, l5m
ex _at_ 400 GeV 10-11 m.rad
Emittance growth at 400 GeV
18
Chromatic Acceptance IP Spot sizes
19
Correction hybride, l5m
L/L0 0.70 for sE/E 0.4
Dimensions rms et luminosité _at_ IP
20
Optics Summary
The ideal solution is surrounded, but not yet
found
21
Conclusions
  • Design for l 4,5 m new optics is possible
    within the TDR length constraint, about 600 m
  • Momentum bandwith already better than TDR
  • Several optimisations are still needed (w.r.t.
    to dispersion, emittance growth, octupoles, )
  • Beam extraction through final doublet OK
  • Collimation requirements about a factor 2 tighter
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com