Title: Permanent Impermanence: The Documentation of SiteSpecific Art
1Permanent Impermanence The Documentation of
Site-Specific Art
- Alli Corn
- 11 December 2006
2- The reproduction of a painting or object,
however perfect, is always, definitely, its
betrayal. And that betrayal is that much greater
when it involves not objects or paintings but
whole spaces. --Daniel Buren
Robert Smithson, Spiral Jetty, 1970.
3Characteristics of Site-Specific Art
- Evolved from Minimalism and Conceptualism during
the late 1960s and 1970s art about idea, rather
than physical object - Circumscribed by permanent sites--gallery setting
or natural landscape - Immobile object or experience specific to
location - Not easily replicated
- Not able to be seen by large numbers of viewers
due to chosen remote locales
Christian Bernard Singer, Bodies of Land, 2001.
Frechette Pond, Alfred, New York floating wax
body casts, moss, pond, reflection
4Paradox Documenting Impermanent Art
- To document these works is a betrayal
- The specific medium, location, and transitory
nature aid in works meaning - Documentation risks compromising the integrity of
the physical work in its original time and
environment
5Documentation is Necessary
- Although paradoxical at times to the artists
intention, it is in many cases the only way for a
wide audience to experience site-specific art. - It is the only way to maintain records and art
historical discourse on site-specific works
6Types of Documentation
7Types of Documentation
- Artist sketches and drawings
- Field notes
8Types of Documentation
- Instructions on installation procedures
- Artist certificate of authenticity
9Documentation is Critical for Art Market
- In the recent past cultural and market values of
site-specific works have risen. - Reappeared in several high-profile exhibitions
- Demand for museums and cultural institutions to
acquire and maintain documentation has grown
exponentially.
10Documentation at ICA, Philadelphia
- ICA produces photo-documentation of all
installations, site-specific or otherwise, using
35mm slide and digital media. - A brochure or catalog is usually produced if it
is a major project and specifically for ICA (4 x
5 color transparencies are taken for this
purpose). - All artist sketches are property of the artist
and kept by him or her. - Ephemera are often cataloged if it is left behind
by the artist or created by ICA.
11Maintenance of Art in Situ at ICA, Philadelphia
- All works are maintained and repaired unless they
are meant to degrade. - At exhibition conclusion, works are either sent
to artist or destroyed on artists request. - Large installation elements that are not crafted
(i.e., concrete blocks, shattered glass) are
disposed. - If work is created at a later date, new materials
are made.
12Regarding Artist Intention and Site-Specific
Documentation
- I think that it is important to document
impermanent works for posterity, - so that others can have a visual point of
reference when studying an - artists oeuvre. I have never had an instance
where an artist did not want - their work documented. If an artist did not want
their work documented - then it should not be done. -Robert Chaney,
Registrar, ICA Philadelphia
13Examples of Site-Specific Art
Robert Smithson, Partially Buried Woodshed,
1970 Kent State University, one woodshed, 20
truck loads of earth
14Michael Asher, untitled installation at Claire
Copley Gallery, Inc., Los Angeles, 1974.
15Richard Serra, Tilted Arc, Federal Plaza, New
York, 1981-1989.
16Importance of Documenting Site-Specific Art
- Recording site-specific works is crucial for
their survival. - Cultural institutions must document these works
to provide access to the general public. - It is important for artists and the museum
community to create multiple mediums with which
to experience the artworks. - Imperative that all documentation must be
approved by the artist as to not distort the
artists meaning. - Without proper documentation, this important art
form risks being lost forever.