The Cost of Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Cost of Meeting

Description:

Extension Livestock Economist and Director, Iowa Beef Center ... Credence attributes. Content: nutrients, fatty acids. Process: natural, free-range, non-GMO ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: rachel217
Category:
Tags: cost | credence | meeting

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Cost of Meeting


1
The Cost of Meeting Consumer Demand(s)
John Lawrence Extension Livestock Economist and
Director, Iowa Beef Center Iowa State University
2
Increased demand
  • Increased demand for beef
  • Grown steadily since 1998
  • Consumers pay more for same amount
  • Quality, convenience, carbs
  • Increased demand on beef
  • Moving from trust me to prove it

3
Commodity to Product
  • Commodity world
  • All beef is beef
  • Minimum standard to qualify
  • Low cost producer of the minimum wins
  • Minimum standard is rising as are costs
  • Age verification, feed ban signatures, COOL
  • Grades define various minimums not products

4
Commodity to Product
  • Product world
  • Some beef is different
  • Differentiated on attributes and brands
  • Consumers pay more for different
  • Attributes
  • Processes
  • Brands

5
Certified programs
  • USDA lists 42 certified beef programs
  • 25 Angus programs
  • 3 Hereford programs with breed claim
  • 4 were process verified or require more than
    visual inspection
  • Red Angus feeder cattle
  • PM Beef
  • 2 Nolan Ryan branded beef

6
Differentiated products
  • Detectable attributes
  • Marbling
  • Guaranteed tender
  • Grass-finished
  • Credence attributes
  • Content nutrients, fatty acids
  • Process natural, free-range, non-GMO

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Standardized Betas for Regression Variables by
Choice-Select Spread
Standardized Coefficients ()
Ch-Sel Std Dev Spread Net Ret FE HCW FC REA KPH M
AR
  • 4.00 50.36 -38.7 49.3 -9.3 22.4 2.0 43.3
  • 8.00 52.61 -35.6 44.4 -8.2 19.7 1.8 54.7
  • 12.00 58.00 -31.8 38.5 -7.2 15.3 1.8 61.7
  • 16.00 65.77 -26.3 31.1 -5.3 12.9 1.1 65.1

10
Cow Cost vs. Feedlot Return
Feedlot Return Cow Cost
Low 32.93 148.50
High 24.07 168.43
11
Willingness to pay
  • Lusk, guaranteed tender steak
  • No label 51 pay 1.23 premium
  • Label 61 1.84 premium
  • Feuz and Umberger, grass v grain fed
  • On average 1.61 more for grain-fed
  • 23 paid 1.36 premium for grass fed
  • Loureiro and Umberger, US Certified
  • Premium for US Certified over no label

12
Verify label claims
  • USDA wants definition of terms
  • Protecting consumers from fraud
  • Branded product needs to assure compliance with
    stated claims
  • Reputation and liability
  • Cost of enforcement on top of cost to produce
    special attributes

13
Meat Standards Australia
  • MSA Guaranteed Tender
  • Animal Age, grain-fed, Bos Indicus
  • Slaughter plant Electrical shock, grading, aging
  • Retailer Sale date, cooking
  • Enforcement and traceback if needed

14
Retail sector changes
  • More powerful and demanding retailers
  • 10 firms with 49 market share
  • Walmart Sams 17
  • House brands and exclusive suppliers
  • Liability issues
  • Outsource inspection and compliance

15
Retail sector changes
  • European influence
  • 2 of top 11 US grocers are European
  • 4 of top 10 world grocers are European
  • Chain Capitan model
  • Retailer is in consumer protector role
  • US consumers still trust USDA for safety
  • Others are not a trusting of govt

16
European lessons
  • Chain Capitan model is costly
  • Safety is competitive issue
  • Must be audited to sell
  • Multiple audits
  • Multiple issues beyond safety
  • Feed use
  • Animal rights
  • Worker safety

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Animal welfare
  • McDonalds plant verification
  • FMI and NCCR guidelines
  • SWAP certification
  • TQA certification

20
Growing demands
  • Widening Choice-Select spread
  • Consolidating retail sector
  • Brands with claims and liabilities
  • Consumers looking for choice
  • Rising commodity standards

21
Victim or Opportunist
  • Most under managers control
  • Some changes require production response
    (genetics, nutrition)
  • Some changes require management response

22
Quality management systems
  • A producer directed management system to assure
    that the producer
  • Capable of meeting the requirements
  • Document that requirements are met
  • Information to evaluate production and marketing
    opportunities when they arise.

23
Quality management systems
  • Various models available ranging in complexity,
    cost, and flexibility
  • 3rd party verification to have value
  • Examples include
  • ISO 90002000
  • USDA Process Verified
  • ISO 14001

24
Quality management systems
  • Cost associated with developing management
    system, audits, and certification
  • Benefits include
  • Market flexibility
  • Better management
  • Lower costs

25
Cost of not meeting demands
  • Commodity market will continue
  • The minimum will continue to rise
  • Missed opportunities if you are not eligible for
    value added markets
  • May lose to pork or poultry, and some beef
    producers will lose to other beef producers

26
Thank You Are there any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com