Title: Laboratory Tests Clinical versus Insurance Medicine
1Laboratory TestsClinical versus Insurance
Medicine
- Zuzanna Guzel MD CMO Allianz, Polska
- Liver enzymes and NASH/ASH
- prognosis
- ICLAM Venice 2004
2Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease NAFLD
- NAFLD has four histological stages
- (1) fatty infiltration of the liver (steatosis)
- (2) fatty infiltration plus inflammation
steatohepatitis - (3) fatty infiltration with ballooning
degeneration - (4) fatty infiltration with lesions similar to
alcoholic hepatitis and sinusoidal fibrosis - advanced fibrosis
- cirrhosis (end-stage liver disease)
3What is Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis NASH
- described in 1980 by Ludwig
- today recognised as a distinct clinical entity
- characterised by evidence of fatty changes with
lobular hepatitis and absence of alcoholism - other terms pseudoalcoholic hepatitis,
alcohol-like hepatitis, fatty-liver hepatitis,
steatonecrosis, and diabetic hepatitis - risk factors obesity, female gender, middle age,
diabetes, dyslipidemia
4Epidemiology and Associated Conditions
- association with the metabolic syndrome in gt85
insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension, and
type 2 diabetes mellitus (hypothyroidism) - risk factors for NASH, include also
hyperlipidemia (hypertriglyceridemia type 2b,
type 4), low HDL-cholesterol, history of
significant/rapid weight loss or weight gain
history of consumption of estrogens, androgens,
extensive abdominal surgery, therapy with drugs
as amiodarone, tamoxifen, perhexiline maleate,
glucocorticoids
5Epidemiology and Associated Conditions
- among those with risk factors, NASH is present in
at least 20 of obese adults or children (BMI
gt30 kg/m2 or gt 27 kg/m2 in Asians ) with or
without type 2 diabetes, and at least 5 of
those overweight (BMI 25 - 30 kg/m2, proposed gt
23 kg/m2 in Asians ) - central obesity (routine anthropometric
measurements)waist gt 85 cm women, gt 97 cm men - waist hipgt 0.85 women, gt 0.90 men
6Prevalence
- the estimated prevalence of hepatic steatosis
(nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) in the general
population is 20 - prevalence of NASH is not well-defined, it is
reported world-wide and is detected in 1.2 to 9
of patients who have liver biopsy - the prevalence of NASH in obese is 20 and there
is 2-3 fold increase in diabetes (40 of pts with
NASH have diabetes, additional 25 give the
family history of NIDDM) - ultrasonographic studies on normal population in
US show a prevalence of 25 for NAFLD (imaging
cannot distinguish between steatosis and NASH) - data from patients who have had liver biopsies
show that alcoholic hepatitis is still 10 to 15
times more common than NASH.
7Importance of NAFLD and NASH
- NAFLD is common disorder, mild, non-progressive
- it overlaps with steatosis
- NAFLD became most common liver disease in western
economies, 2-3 times more common than HBV, HCV
and ALD (alcoholic liver disease) - there is rising prevalence in Asia-Pacific region
- NASH became widely accepted as important cause of
liver disease (liver failure) - NASH can develop CC, end-stage liver disease
8Patient profile
- obese middle-aged women
- diabetes mellitus
- hypercholesterolemia, or hypertriglyceridemia
- asymptomatic hepatomegaly
- 2-4-fold elevation of serum aminotransferase
levels (unexplained) - other LFTs results are usually normal
9Laboratory Evaluation - ALT
- ALT is the most cost-effective screening test for
metabolic or drug-induced liver injury - ALT is useful for detecting acute and chronic
hepatic injury, not related to severity of acute
hepatic injury and only weakly related to
severity of chronic hepatic injury - the definition of chronic hepatic injury by
increased ALT is widely accepted - Increased ALT
(without another explanation) on more than one
occasion over a period of 6 months - if increased ALT is found on routine testing,
this should be confirmed by repeat testing before
further evaluation - ALT may be normal in patients with cirrhosis,
whereas AST remains increased - AST should also be measured with history of
alcohol abuse
10Laboratory evaluation - AST
- AST lt 10 times normal is non-specific and may
occur with any form of liver injury - AST usuallylt50 IU/L in fatty liver
- lt 100 IU/L in alcoholic cirrhosis
- lt 150 IU/L in alcoholic hepatitis
- lt 200 IU/L in 65 of patients with cirrhosis
- lt 200 IU/L in 50 with meta to liver, leukemia
- AST is normal in 25, ALT is normal in 50 cases
of alcoholic cirrhosis
11Laboratory Evaluation ASTALT
- ASTALT ratio is a useful index for
distinguishing NASH from alcoholic liver disease - typically lt1 in NASH,with progression to
cirrhosis the ratio often increases to gt1 - a ratio of gt or 2 is strongly suggestive of
alcoholic liver disease (alcoholic hepatitis and
cirrhosis) - ASTALTlt1 occurs in 70 of NASH patients compared
with 26 of patients with post-necrotic
cirrhosis, 8 with chronic hepatitis, 4 with
viral hepatitis, and none with obstructive
jaundice
12Laboratory evaluation - ASH
- increased GGT and MCVgt 100 together or separately
in occult alcoholism - increased AST (lt300 IU/L) with normal ALT
- AST ALT gt1 and ASTlt 300 IU/L identifies 90 of
people with alcoholic liver disease - ALP normal or moderately increased in 20-50 of
cases (not useful test) - changes last gt 6 wks after abstaining from
alcohol - advanced disease increased PT - indicator of
poor prognosis - increased WBC, anaemia
- PT gt5 s above reference, bilirubin gt428 µmol/L
(gt25 mg/dL), or albumin decreased lt25 g/L (2.5
g/dL) in a patient gt55 years of age predicts 90
likelihood of death .
13Clinical diagnosis of NASH
- convincing evidence of negligible alcohol
consumption - mild elevation of ALT, GGTP
- anthropometric measurements
- determination of insulin resistance (fasting
serum insuline and glucose levels, c-peptide) - serum lipids raised TG, low HDL-C
- increased echogenicity on US (fatty liver)
- absence of serologic evidence of previous
infection with the hepatitis B or C virus - a liver biopsy is recommended
14Diagnosis before biopsy
- NASH
- predictive value of a diagnosis of NAFLD before
biopsy is only 56 for NASH
- ASH
- predictive value of a diagnosis for alcoholic
liver disease is 86
15Predictors of the degree of fibrosis
- NASH
- age( gt 45-50 yrs), sex (F), obesity, and diabetes
mellitus hyperlipidemia (triglicerydemia) - grade of Perls stain (Liver iron overload)
- ASH
- age, sex, BMI, Perls grade, and blood glucose
level
16Chronic Hepatic Injury
- NASH
- 8 to 20 of patients with NASH progress to
cirrhosis - liver-related deaths occur in 8 of these
patients, over a 10-year period
- ASH
- 38 to 50 of patients with alcoholic hepatitis
progress to cirrhosis - at high risk of accelerated alcoholic liver
injury are women, obese and those with
hepatitis C
17Life expectancy
- NASH
- 5-year survival 67
- 10-year survival 59
- patients with NASH have lower life expectancy
than age- and sex-matched controls from the
normal population
- ASH
- 5-year survival 38
- 10-year survival 15
18Clinical Course
- NASH can progress to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis
and chronic hepatic failure, eventually to the
need for a liver transplantation - up to 50 of NASH patients develop liver fibrosis
15 develop cirrhosis, 3 may progress to
terminal liver failure, requiring liver
transplantation (the treatment of choice for
end-stage liver disease secondary to NASH) - cryptogenic liver cirrhosis accounts for 10 of
liver cirrhosis and is associated with NASH
(obesity, NIDDM) - NASH plays also a role in the development of HCC
19Alcohol consumption
20Excessive alcohol consumption
- routinely used markers gamma-glutamyltransferase,
mean corpuscular volume, levels of AST and ALT -
detect alcohol-induced liver impairment - new markers carbohydrate deficient transferrin
(CDT) and WBAA whole-blood-associated
acetaldehyde assay (HAA), EDAC (early detection
of alcohol consumption test) - EDAC as screening tool for detection heavy
alcohol abuse, CDT as confirmatory test (FDA
approved)
21Alcohol screen for insurance
22Alcohol screen for insurance
23NASH/ASH screen for insurance in CEEC
24Questions to be answered before ordering a new
test. Brackenridge decalogue
- 1. Is the test cost-effective?
- 2. Is it safe?
- 3. Is it convenient for screening?
- 4. Is it accepted by the medical community?
- 5. What are the sensitivity, specificity and
predictive value of the test? - 6. Can the test be done by the reference
laboratories used by insurance industry
(ex.Eastern Europe)? - 7. Does the test deal with the impairment of
significant morbidity / mortality? - 8. Does the impairment tested occur frequently
enough within the insured population (country,
continent) to justify the demand for test? - 9. Does the test improve the equity of the
underwriting process by more accurately assigning
individuals to appropriate risk classes? - 10. Does the test enhance value to the consumer
by keeping insurance costs low and product
availability high for the great majority of
insurance applicants?