Criminal Procedure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Criminal Procedure

Description:

Exception-curtilage: the area immediately surrounding the house ... intrusions into curtilage are 4th Amendment searches. Open Fields ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: andyful
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Criminal Procedure


1
Criminal Procedure CJ 422 Chapter 3 Searches and
Seizures Andrew Fulkerson, JD, PhD Southeast
Missouri State University
2
Purpose of Searches and Seizures
  • Obtain information
  • Most criminals and witnesses do not give up
    information willingly

3
Purpose of Searches and Seizures
  • Law officers get information from involuntary
    methods
  • searches
  • seizures
  • interrogation
  • identification procedures

4
Purposes of Search and Seizures
  • Protect officers from armed suspects
  • Protect property of detained suspects (inventory
    seaches)
  • Protect officials from lawsuits
  • Detect drug use among students and public
    employees

5
Purpose of 4th Amendment
  • Ensure that government does not collect
    information unreasonably

6
4th Amendment - History
  • Search and seizure law originated with the
    printing press
  • Persons published books and leaflets that
    criticized the king
  • King sought to stop seditious libel

7
4th Amendment - History
  • General Warrants
  • used to silence critical printers
  • enforce taxes on goods
  • gave broad authority to enter homes and
    businesses

8
4th Amendment - History
  • Writs of assistance
  • gave power for officers to force private citizens
    to assist in the searches and seizures

9
4th Amendment - History
  • . 4th Amendment prevents govt. from collecting
    evidence in unreasonable manner
  • Protects liberty-right to come and go
    (locomotion)
  • Protects privacy-right to be let alone
  • Protects against government interference-not
    private

10
4th Amendment Analysis
  • Three-step analysis
  • Was the government action a search or seizure?
  • If it was a search or seizure, was it
    unreasonable?
  • If the search or seizure was unreasonable, should
    the evidence be excluded?

11
4th Amendment Analysis
  • Govt. actions that may trigger 4th Amendment
    analysis
  • Encounters between police and individuals in
    public places
  • Encounters between police and individuals at
    police station

12
4th Amendment Analysis
  • Govt. actions that may trigger 4th Amendment
    analysis
  • Encounters between prisoners and officials in
    jails or prisons between students and officials
    in school between employers and employees in
    public agencies

13
4th Amendment Searches
  • Trespass doctrine (until 1967)
  • Required physical intrusion into constitutionally
    protected area
  • persons
  • houses
  • papers
  • effects

14
4th Amendment Searches
  • Trespass doctrine (until 1967)
  • Handwriting samples, voice samples not searches

15
Privacy Doctrine
  • 4th Amendment protects persons, not places.
  • Balances need for govt. to control crime, with
    the citizens right of privacy.

16
Privacy Doctrine
  • Balance usually weighs in favor of govt. need to
    control crime
  • Protects against arbitrary government intrusion

17
Expectation of Privacy
  • Two-pronged test
  • Subjective privacy. Whether a person had an
    actual expectation of privacy
  • Objective privacy. Whether the subjective
    expectation of privacy is reasonable.

18
4th Amendment
  • Katz v. U.S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
  • U.S. v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976)
  • Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979)

19
Electronic Surveillance
  • U.S. v. Kim (telescope)
  • California v. Ciraolo (airplane)

20
Electronic Surveillance
  • U.S. v. White, 401 U.S. 745 (1971)
  • Kyllo v. U.S., 533 U.S. 27 (2001)

21
Plain View, Hearing, Smell, and Touch
  • Discovery of evidence by ordinary senses

22
Plain View Doctrine
  • Discovery of items by means of plain view, touch,
    hearing and smell fall outside the scope of the
    4th Amendment.

23
Plain View
  • Conditions for plain view searches and seizures
  • Officers are lawfully present
  • Detection occurs without advanced technology to
    enhance the senses
  • Detection is inadvertent-not planned

24
Plain View
  • Plain view doctrine applies only to detection by
    ordinary senses.
  • Some enhancement is allowed (eyeglasses,
    flashlights)
  • High powered enhancement is not
  • (x-rays)

25
Dog Sniffs
  • Illinois v. Caballes, 125 S.Ct. 834 (2005)

26
Open Fields
  • Exception-curtilage the area immediately
    surrounding the house
  • includes yard, pool, patio, attached garage
  • intrusions into curtilage are 4th Amendment
    searches

27
Open Fields
  • Criteria for determining what is the curtilage
  • distance from house
  • presence or absence of fence
  • measures taken to prevent public view

28
Open Fields
  • 4th Amendment does not protect open fields, even
    if officers trespass
  • Society not recognize any reasonable expectation
    of privacy in open fields

29
Abandonment
  • Person has no reasonable expectation of privacy
    in abandoned property
  • Abandonment has two elements
  • intent to throw away property
  • acts that prove that intent

30
Abandonment
  • Abandonment requires intent to give up control of
    property
  • Supreme Court has adopted a totality of the
    circumstances test

31
Abandonment
  • California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988)
  • State v. Morris, 165 Vt. 111, 680 A.2d 90 (1996)

32
Public Places
  • 4th Amendment does not protect what police
    discover in public places
  • Public places include private business areas open
    to the public
  • Does not include areas reserved for employees
    only

33
Public Places - Exception
  • Public place exception not include private areas
    of public restrooms
  • The open area of public restroom is public
    place
  • Protects the stalls of restrooms, except for what
    officers can see above and below partitions, and
    through the cracks in partitions

34
4th Amendment Seizures
  • Stopping person and asking questions is not a
    seizure under the 4th Amend.

35
4th Amendment Seizures
  • California v. Hodari, 499 U.S. 621 (1991
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com